« Terrorism and international relations » : différence entre les versions
Aucun résumé des modifications |
|||
| (3 versions intermédiaires par le même utilisateur non affichées) | |||
| Ligne 25 : | Ligne 25 : | ||
With the completion of the first phase of the Relaxation, the dismantling of a Western order guaranteed by the American power, the new indirect East-West and North-South conflicts are redefining terrorism to fully integrate it into the relations between large systems and blocs. The '''barbaric/civilized dichotomy''' is elaborated as a true category of analysis and thus allows for the reclassification of the classic terrorist act in a simplified and globalized form. The notion of "'''international terrorism'''" symbolizes the integration of this form of violence into the theory of international relations and strategic thinking. The "good practices" of the barbaric/civilized dichotomy will be at the centre of many geopoliticians' and strategists' theories. The growing success of these analyses, in order to affect the representations of political actors on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, has a direct impact on the representations of the field of international relations. | With the completion of the first phase of the Relaxation, the dismantling of a Western order guaranteed by the American power, the new indirect East-West and North-South conflicts are redefining terrorism to fully integrate it into the relations between large systems and blocs. The '''barbaric/civilized dichotomy''' is elaborated as a true category of analysis and thus allows for the reclassification of the classic terrorist act in a simplified and globalized form. The notion of "'''international terrorism'''" symbolizes the integration of this form of violence into the theory of international relations and strategic thinking. The "good practices" of the barbaric/civilized dichotomy will be at the centre of many geopoliticians' and strategists' theories. The growing success of these analyses, in order to affect the representations of political actors on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, has a direct impact on the representations of the field of international relations. | ||
'''The 11 September attacks are a fundamental breakthrough'''. Terrorism elevated to the rank of "global" is being reinterpreted as the new form of North-South warfare. | '''The 11 September attacks are a fundamental breakthrough'''. Terrorism elevated to the rank of "global" is being reinterpreted as the new form of North-South warfare. The "War on Terror" proclaimed by the Bush administration is now re-ordering the field of international relations. From Afghanistan to the rogue states, from the project in the new Middle East to the European Union, or even Russia and its allies, the unilateralist American choices are transforming in depth the entire multilateral system of international relations elaborated on the ashes of the Cold War, symbolized by the fall of the Berlin Wall. | ||
{{Translations | {{Translations | ||
| fr = Terrorisme et relations internationales | | fr = Terrorisme et relations internationales | ||
| es = Terrorismo y relaciones internacionales | | es = Terrorismo y relaciones internacionales | ||
| it = Terrorismo e relazioni internazionali | |||
| de = Terrorismus und internationale Beziehungen | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Ligne 45 : | Ligne 47 : | ||
* [[Homegrown jihadism: How to prevent terrorist catastrophe?]] | * [[Homegrown jihadism: How to prevent terrorist catastrophe?]] | ||
= References = | |||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Version actuelle datée du 12 février 2018 à 15:34
| Faculté | Faculté des sciences de la société |
|---|---|
| Département | Département de science politique et relations internationales |
| Professeur(s) | Rémi Baudoui[1] (2011 - ) |
| Enregistrement(s) | 2014, 2015 |
| Cours | Terrorism and international relations |
Lectures
- Terrorism or terrorisms? Some epistemological considerations
- National security and counter-terrorism: the example of Latin America
- Internationalisation of struggles and emergence of international terrorism
- International relations and the fight against international terrorism
- The United States and the New International Order
- Middle East Geopolitics
- September 11, 2001 ruptures
- Al-Qaida and the "geopolitics of radical terrorism"
- Combating terrorism and rebuilding transatlantic relations
- Arab Spring Against Terrorism: Issues and Perspectives
- Homegrown jihadism: How to prevent terrorist catastrophe?
The Terrorism and International Relations course examines the ways in which terrorism and its impacts interact with international relations issues and questions. Until the Cold War, the field of international relations, which was to be placed under the guise of diplomats and soldiers, paid little attention to terrorism. Terrorism had hitherto been experienced as a matter of state jurisdiction and thus interpreted as a localised "disorder" that threatens only those who are impregnated with it. With the Westphalian system of analysis, only the consequences for peace of an inter-State conflict could determine the evolution of international relations between powers.
With the completion of the first phase of the Relaxation, the dismantling of a Western order guaranteed by the American power, the new indirect East-West and North-South conflicts are redefining terrorism to fully integrate it into the relations between large systems and blocs. The barbaric/civilized dichotomy is elaborated as a true category of analysis and thus allows for the reclassification of the classic terrorist act in a simplified and globalized form. The notion of "international terrorism" symbolizes the integration of this form of violence into the theory of international relations and strategic thinking. The "good practices" of the barbaric/civilized dichotomy will be at the centre of many geopoliticians' and strategists' theories. The growing success of these analyses, in order to affect the representations of political actors on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, has a direct impact on the representations of the field of international relations.
The 11 September attacks are a fundamental breakthrough. Terrorism elevated to the rank of "global" is being reinterpreted as the new form of North-South warfare. The "War on Terror" proclaimed by the Bush administration is now re-ordering the field of international relations. From Afghanistan to the rogue states, from the project in the new Middle East to the European Union, or even Russia and its allies, the unilateralist American choices are transforming in depth the entire multilateral system of international relations elaborated on the ashes of the Cold War, symbolized by the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Lectures[modifier | modifier le wikicode]
- Terrorism or terrorisms? Some epistemological considerations
- National security and counter-terrorism: the example of Latin America
- Internationalisation of struggles and emergence of international terrorism
- International relations and the fight against international terrorism
- The United States and the New International Order
- Middle East Geopolitics
- September 11, 2001 ruptures
- Al-Qaida and the "geopolitics of radical terrorism"
- Combating terrorism and rebuilding transatlantic relations
- Arab Spring Against Terrorism: Issues and Perspectives
- Homegrown jihadism: How to prevent terrorist catastrophe?
References[modifier | modifier le wikicode]