US Post-War Society: Cold War and the Society of Plenty

De Baripedia

Until 2003, in Texas, after September 11, 2001, the Pledge of Allegiance was to be pronounced at the school: "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation united under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Under the word "god" had been added in 1954 by a decision of Congress in the midst of nationalism that in religious matters the United States was different from the atheistic Soviet Union.[8] During this period, children had to simulate Soviet nuclear attacks to prevent themselves from radioactive fallout.

We are going to look at the process that allowed the United States to get to this point as the United States emerged strengthened from the second world war with the development of the affluent society.

The United States and the Cold War[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

When the United States launched its atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States thought it would end the war with Japan quickly, but also put the Soviets in an inferior position for the post-war negotiations.

Allied leaders at the conference. From left to right: Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin.

At the end of 1945, the United States was in a situation unlike that of other great nations, it had not been ravaged on its territory and its economy was booming; however, it was unable to impose liberalism on the Soviet Union, i.e., to demand free world trade, and to open the market to the U.S. economy so that it could dominate the market if necessary with the political and military help of Washington.

In February 1945, at Yalta between Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill, they laid the foundations of the UN, but did not resolve anything in economic and political matters.

In 1946, the USSR refused to join the new financial institutions created by the United States, but also to promote loans and guarantee private institutions such as the World Bank, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Monetary Fund.

Through these institutions, the United States wants to guarantee its financial and commercial hegemony over the whole world, but the USSR refuses to join these institutions.

The fears that fuel the Cold War[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

Apart from that, the root causes of this Cold War lie in two great fears:

  • Among the Soviets

It is the fear of encirclement by the capitalist powers that, in their view, justify their advance to the West and their imposition of communist regimes on buffer states; these states had been created after the First World War to prevent the advance of the Soviet Union.

  • Among Americans

It is the fear that the USSR represents a global threat to which the United States should respond with comprehensive military responses.

After the Second World War, the world is in a period of decompression, with European countries and Japan's economies in complete ruin. There is no longer a government in Japan and Germany, and in some countries such as Greece and China, there are civil wars and the adversaries in conflict are either supported by the United States or the Soviets. The British and French colonial empires were founded under the impetus of national liberation movements; nothing seems to hold any longer.

U.S. Internal Factors[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

In the United States itself, there are several factors that will heighten these fears:

  • the fact that Roosevelt's successor, Truman, is not as agile as his predecessor.
  • war industrialists have made huge profits and hope to continue to do so by producing and selling weapons.
  • ideologically, there is also a long tradition of anti-socialist and anti-Bolshevik ideology dating back to the 1880s. During the war there was also strong anti-communist propaganda.
  • fear that the misery in which much of the world found itself would encourage the rise of communist parties in these countries, particularly in France and Italy.

The most general idea is that the well-being of the United States depends on its continued economic growth linked to its conquests, which constitute new markets for its exports, but also for its supplies of raw materials. The United States sees anything that limits its plans for global expansion as an attack on its interests.

Doctrine Truman[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The labeling used on Marshall Plan aid packages.

In 1947, in order to justify U.S. aid to the Greek and Turkish governments, Truman formalized the Truman Doctrine to help people fight the totalitarianism that threatens the welfare of the United States.[9][10][11][12]

This doctrine is in addition to the policy of containment formulated by George Kennan; it promotes the idea that the United States will confront the Soviet Union with an inflexible force wherever the USSR encroaches on interests and a world of peace and stability.

The Cold War policy of the Cold War and an extension of the Monroe Doctrine to areas not controlled by the United States.[13][14][15][16][17]

The United States launches the Marchal plan to revive the economies of Western Europe and counter the rise of left-wing parties.[18][19][20][21]

National Security Act[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The American Congress passes the National Security Act, which adapts certain American institutions to the Cold War.

A unified Department of Defense was created and the National Security Council, which coordinates U.S. foreign and military policies and advises the president, was also established.[22][23] At the same time, the CIA was created.

Beginning in the early 1950s, the CIA conducted covert operations to overthrow foreign leaders and governments perceived to be hostile to the United States.[24][25][26][27]

The development of McCarthyism: 1947 - 1962[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

This cold war is being played out outside, but it may also be played out inside the United States. Almost all the victims United States are innocent.

McCarthy chats with Roy Cohn (right) at the Army-McCarthy hearings.

In general, this whole anti-communist campaign within the United States is attached to the name of Joseph McCarthy, the West Virginia Senator and Republican who gave rise to McCarthyism.[28][29]

However, it was not he who created the post-war hysteria, but Truman, a Democrat, who started the crusade because he was worried about the growing membership of the Communist Party of America, which has about 80,000 members.[30][31][32]

A series of strikes in industries are well followed and protest against the numerous layoffs and the end of overtime as we moved from a war economy to a peace economy generating strikes to protest against the decrease in real wages.

Truman demanded an assessment of the loyalty of members of the federal government. The victory of Mao Tse tong in China, which proclaimed the People's Republic of China in 1949, will only accentuate this suspicion, as the People's Republic of China will not be recognized until 1979 by the United States.

The outbreak of cases of transmission of confidential documents to the USSR will allow McCarthy to accuse the government of being infested with communists. He felt that the anti-communist argument would give the Republicans a political advantage.

In creating a sense of fear and internal enemy, everyone plays along, and Congress approves a Homeland Security Act that makes it illegal for anyone to contribute to the establishment of a totalitarian dictatorship ordering all members of communist organizations to register with the government.

These people are excluded from certain positions and their passports are seized in order to prevent them from travelling, and Truman evicts certain elements.

In 1954, North Korean troops entered South Korean territory; Truman ordered U.S. intervention approved by the Security Council, but approved because of the absence of the USSR, which protested China's lack of permanent membership by practicing the "empty chair policy".[33][34][35]

Ethel and Julius Rosenberg.

A couple of scientists, the Rosenbergs, are arrested for having "supposedly" transmitted information about the atomic bomb to the Soviets during the war. Even though there was a protest movement they were executed in the electric chair.[36][37][38][39]

In the same year 1953, after twenty years of Democratic presidency, a Republican, military hero, Dwight Eisenhower became president with Richard Nixon as vice-president, at that time American WASP nationalism and McCarthyism were in full swing.

It was then that in 1954, Eisenhower added a "nation under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance that children must do under the American flag. It was also at this time that Congress passed a 265-2 vote in favor of a law banning the Communist Party[40][41][42][43] Reinforcing the need for loyalty among federal employees, to lose one's job as a public servant a simple whistle-blower was all that was needed, no evidence was required and no recourse was available.

In a case where the United States is very legalistic, it does not protect the accused by law.

McCarthy is challenged when he tries to denounce the penetration of the army by the communists.

The Soviet Union is in full expansion, it is also exploring its first H-bomb. At the same time, Moscow established the Warsaw Defence Pact in 1955, which was a response to the NATO pact established by the United States in 1949.[44][45][46][47][48] The repression of the Soviet invasion reinforced this, as did the first intercontinental missile launch and the sending of the world's first Sputnik satellite into the atmosphere in 1957.

Even if the USSR does not directly threaten the United States, this is enough to justify the Truman policy.

The American Society of Plenty[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

These are years of fear, of enormous inner control, but at the same time, they are years of abundance. At this time, the United States is probably establishing, for the first time in human history, a society of abundance.

What is curious is that usually the mobilization of the population against an internal enemy takes place in a period of economic crisis and against a group that leads the popular fury and does not question the system.

Causes and characteristics[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

En 1945, the United States entered a period of economic boom that would consolidate its domestic hierarchy and last 25 years.

At that time, Americans did not know that it would last, and many still feared a return to the Great Depression of the 1930s. Anti-communism will consolidate interventionist nationalism and justify to the public that the United States is sending its boys to war outside the United States. With this anticommunist rhetoric, young men were still being sent to fight outside the United States.

This boom is based first and foremost on the building and automobile construction and the arms industry. It is going to benefit the Americans at ¾.

United States birth rate (births per 1000 population).[49] The United States Census Bureau defines the demographic birth boom as between 1946 and 1964[50] (red).

Starting in 1945 there is a baby boom, in the United States 63.5 million children were born between 1945 and 1961. In 1940 there were 132 million, in 1960 almost 189 million.[51][52]

When you compare with other countries there is always the birth boom at the end of a war. What is interesting in the United States is that it will last until the 1960s. This will be reflected in the construction industry with the building of houses and schools. At the same time, factories, supermarkets, and airports are being built. A large part of these constructions are in new areas called "suburban" areas with villa zones.

This is going to generate the boom in automobile construction, which requires a densification of transport networks between housing and consumption centres. It is an economy and a society based on the car that is being formed with drive-in theatres as its symbol.

It is also the boom in military spending, which quadrupled between 1949 and 1954, and has continued to rise ever since. A large part of the military budget is used to fund research and the production of increasingly sophisticated weapons in line with the Cold War's globalisation - the so-called "arms race", which was mainly launched with the Soviet Union.

In the United States, the war industry is privately owned, but depends on contracts with the federal government. This is why the arms industries have a vested interest in applying the Monroe doctrine to the whole world by creating a sense of insecurity.

A transistor radio made by Sanyo in 1959. Japan manufactured much of the world's consumer electronics during this period.

It is also worth noting the invention of the transistor in 1947 which led to the electronic revolution leading to the automation of many industries; there is a consequent decrease in industrial employment and a new wave of concentration of production which is materialized by mergers by large corporations that have financial and technological power that will acquire other subsidiary industries to assemble them in large consortiums where a central industry will acquire all the subsidiaries that will allow it to manufacture the final products.

We are in the fourth wave of concentration, the first and the end of the 19th century, the 1920s, the New Deal and the post-war period; we have reached a situation of unprecedented concentration of industrial capital.

This concentration also manifests itself in capitalism, where the AFL and the CIO merge into an anti-communist trade union movement. At the same time, the number of union members is not increasing. The new jobs created are mostly for "white collar" workers and for sectors where there is not a strong trade unionist tradition.

At the same time, there is a movement of concentration in agriculture with an ever-increasing mechanisation of all agricultural production processes thanks to technological development, machinery, the use of pesticides and fertilisers that allow for huge productions and a new movement of concentration.

It is interesting to see that agricultural productivity has doubled in 15 years and at the same time the number of families making a living from agriculture has halved.

In the southern United States, this will drive out 4 million Americans, mostly blacks and sharecroppers, who will be chased away to northern cities and California.

Birth of the symbols of America's affluent society[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

It is in these years that the great symbols of the American society of abundance were born with television, it is also the beginning of symbols such as Macdonald, Barbie, Marilyn Monroe or Elvis Presley.

Presley in the 1950s really shocked WASP circles since he was inspired by black circles and was subjectively contorted.

The ¾ of Americans enjoying the affluent society[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The vast majority are white middle-class people, many of whom will leave the east coast to migrate to the sun-belt; these regions are gradually industrialising, thanks in particular to the development of air conditioning, which allows work in factories.

In these regions, the arms industry, aeronautics, oil extraction and agribusiness are developing.

Middle class women are completely challenged since they had been integrated into the industrial workforce. The idea is to follow salaried work while being in conflict with a traditionalist value system.

The white middle classes are the big winners not only because they are the ones working in the expanding sectors and regions, but also because they are the ones benefiting from federal programs.

The Federal Housing Administration provides mortgages to finance real estate purchases, but these insurances "do not accept the poor, non-whites, Jews, and other racially disharmonious groups.[53][54]

Federal investments are also being made in the highway system, which are increasing 38-fold. At the same time, public transport and railways were completely abandoned, and until the end of the 1960s there was no construction of social housing for the poor.

The ¼ of Americans in Poverty[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

They are mostly elderly or children, the majority are single women who are widowed or divorced, 70 per cent live in cities and 30 per cent in smaller, more rural communities.

The poorest category is that of Amerindians, whose annual income is half the average income of the poor.[55][56]

In 1953, Congress decided to eliminate Indian reservations. It was the Indian termination policy that removed federal assistance to reserves, encouraging Native Americans to abandon their reserves in exchange for the payment of meager bonuses that swelled the miserable population of the cities.[57][58]

Quand cette politique est stoppée en 1960, de nombreuses tribus ont été décimées.[59][60][61][62]

They are also the urban poor and Puerto Rican immigrants, especially Mexicans, as well as sharecroppers and migrant workers.

Until the early 1960s, the United States did not care about the poor; it was Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson who arrived after Kennedy's assassination and launched the war against poverty which, unfortunately, was to be curbed very dramatically because of the Vietnam War. However, this aid bore fruit, poverty was reduced and 25% of pollution classified as poor fell to 11% in 1973.[63][64][65][66][67][68][69]

Annexes[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

References[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

  1. Aline Helg - UNIGE
  2. Aline Helg -
  3. Aline Helg - Wikipedia
  4. Aline Helg -
  5. Aline Helg -
  6. Aline Helg -
  7. Aline Helg - Google Scholar
  8. The phrase "under God" was added to the pledge by a Congressional act approved on June 14, 1954. At that time, President Eisenhower said: "in this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way, we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource in peace and war."
  9. Full text and audio of the speech
  10. Freeland, Richard M. (1970). The Truman Doctrine and the Origins of McCarthyism. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. pp. g. 90.
  11. Hinds, Lynn Boyd, and Theodore Otto Windt Jr. The Cold War as Rhetoric: The Beginnings, 1945–1950 (1991) online edition
  12. Merrill, Dennis (2006). "The Truman Doctrine: Containing Communism and Modernity". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 36 (1): 27–37. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.00284.x.
  13. "Present Status of the Monroe Doctrine". Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 54: 1–129. 1914. ISSN 0002-7162. JSTOR i242639. 14 articles by experts
  14. Perkins, Dexter (1927). The Monroe Doctrine, 1823–1826. 3 vols.
  15. Rossi, Christopher R. (2019) "The Monroe Doctrine and the Standard of Civilization." Whiggish International Law (Brill Nijhoff, 2019) pp. 123-152.
  16. Sexton, Jay (2011). The Monroe Doctrine: Empire and Nation in 19th-Century America. Hill & Wang. 290 pages; competing and evolving conceptions of the doctrine after 1823
  17. Monroe Doctrine and related resources at the Library of Congress
  18. Diebold, William (1988). "The Marshall Plan in Retrospect: A Review of Recent Scholarship". Journal of International Affairs. 41 (2): 421–435. JSTOR 24356953.
  19. Bryan, Ferald J. "George C. Marshall at Harvard: A Study of the Origins and Construction of the 'Marshall Plan' Speech." Presidential Studies Quarterly (1991): 489-502. Online
  20. Mee, Charles L. The Marshall Plan: The Launching of the Pax Americana (1984).
  21. Weissman, Alexander D. "Pivotal politics—The Marshall Plan: A turning point in foreign aid and the struggle for democracy." History Teacher 47.1 (2013): 111-129. online
  22. Brown, Cody M. The National Security Council: A Legal History of the President's Most Powerful Advisers, Project on National Security Reform (2008).
  23. Encyclopedia of American foreign policy, 2nd ed. Vol. 2, New York: Scribner, 2002, National Security Council, 22 April 2009
  24. Warner, Michael (June 13, 2013). "CIA Cold War Records: THE CIA UNDER HARRY TRUMAN — Central Intelligence Agency"
  25. "Office of the General Counsel: History of the Office". Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
  26. "CIA – History". Federation of American Scientists.
  27. Warner, Michael (1995). "The Creation of the Central Intelligence Group" (PDF). Studies in Intelligence. Center for the Study of Intelligence. 39 (5): 111–120.
  28. United States Congress. "Joseph McCarthy (id: M000315)". Biographical Directory of the United States Congress.
  29. FBI file on Joseph McCarthy
  30. Caute, David (1978). The Great Fear: The Anti-Communist Purge Under Truman and Eisenhower. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-671-22682-7.
  31. Latham, Earl (ed.). The Meaning of McCarthyism (1965). excerpts from primary and secondary sources
  32. Schrecker, Ellen (1994). The Age of McCarthyism: A Brief History with Documents. Bedford Books of St. Martin's Press. ISBN 0-312-08349-1.
  33. Luuk van Middelaar, Le passage à l'Europe, Paris, Galimard, 2012, 479 p. (ISBN 978-2-07-013033-7)
  34. « Le compromis de Luxembourg », sur
  35. Matthias Schönwald: Walter Hallstein and the „Empty chair“ Crisis 1965/66. In: Wilfried Loth (Hrsg.): Crises and compromises. Nomos, Baden-Baden 2001, ISBN 3-7890-6980-9, S. 157–172.
  36. Alman, Emily A. and David. Exoneration: The Trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and Morton Sobell – Prosecutorial deceptions, suborned perjuries, anti-Semitism, and precedent for today's unconstitutional trials. Green Elms Press, 2010. ISBN 978-0-9779058-3-6 or ISBN 0-9779058-3-7.
  37. Carmichael, Virginia .Framing history: the Rosenberg story and the Cold War, (University of Minnesota Press, 1993).
  38. "David Greenglass grand jury testimony transcript" (PDF). National Security Archive, Gelman Library, George Washington University. August 7, 1950.
  39. Wexley, John. The Judgment of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Ballantine Books, 1977. ISBN 0-345-24869-4.
  40. Communist Control Act of 1954, August 24, 1954, An Act to outlaw the Communist Party, to prohibit members of Communist organizations from serving in certain representative capacities, and for other purposes.
  41. McAuliffe, Mary S. “Liberals and the Communist Control Act of 1954.” The Journal of American History. 63.2. (1976): 351-67.
  42. Haerle, Paul R. “Constitutional Law: Federal Anti-Subversive Legislation: The Communist Control act of 1954.” Michigan Law Review. 53.8 (1955): 1153–65.
  43. “The Communist Control Act of 1954.” The Yale Law Journal. 64.5 (1955): 712-65.
  44. "Text of Warsaw Pact" (PDF). United Nations Treaty Collection. Archived (PDF) from the original
  45. Yost, David S. (1998). NATO Transformed: The Alliance's New Roles in International Security. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press. p. 31. ISBN 1-878379-81-X.
  46. Formation of Nato and Warsaw Pact. History Channel. Archived from the original.
  47. "The Warsaw Pact is formed". History Channel. Archived from the original.
  48. "In reaction to West Germany's NATO accession, the Soviet Union and its Eastern European client states formed the Warsaw Pact in 1955." Citation from: NATO website. "A short history of NATO". Archived from the original.
  49. CDC Bottom of this page "Vital Statistics of the United States, 2003, Volume I, Natality", Table 1-1 "Live births, birth rates, and fertility rates, by race: United States, 1909-2003."
  50. U.S. Census Bureau — Oldest Boomers Turn 60 (2006)August 2010
  51. Van Bavel, Jan; Reher, David S. (2013). "The Baby Boom and Its Causes: What We Know and What We Need to Know". Population and Development Review. 39 (2): 264–265. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00591.x.
  52. Figures in Landon Y. Jones, "Swinging 60s?" in Smithsonian Magazine, January 2006, pp 102–107.
  53. Principles to Guide Housing Policy at the Beginning of the Millennium, Michael Schill & Susan Wachter, Cityscape
  54. "Racial" Provisions of FHA Underwriting Manual, 1938 Recommended restrictions should include provision for the following: Prohibition of the occupancy of properties except by the race for which they are intended … Schools should be appropriate to the needs of the new community and they should not be attended in large numbers by inharmonious racial groups.
  55. Getches, David H.; Wilkinson, Charles F.; Williams, Robert L. (2005). Cases and Materials on Federal Indian Law. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West. pp. 199–216. ISBN 978-0-314-14422-5.
  56. Wunder, John R. (1999). Native American Sovereignty. Taylor & Francis. pp. 248–249. ISBN 9780815336297. Retrieved December 26, 2014.
  57. House concurrent resolution 108 (HCR-108), passed August 1, 1953, declared it to be the sense of Congress that it should be policy of the United States to abolish federal supervision over American Indian tribes as soon as possible and to subject the Indians to the same laws, privileges, and responsibilities as other US citizens - US Statutes at Large 67:B132
  58. "Public Law 280" . The Tribal Court Clearinghouse. 1953-08-15. Retrieved 2007-05-01.
  59. Fixico, Donald Lee (1986). Termination and Relocation: Federal Indian Policy, 1945-1960. University of New Mexico Press. ISBN 978-0-8263-0908-2.
  60. raska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-3723-0. Ulrich, Roberta (2010). American Indian Nations from Termination to Restoration, 1953-2006. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-3364-5.
  61. "Federal Indian Policies". Oneida Indian Nation. Archived from the original
  62. "List of Federal and State Recognized Tribes".
  63. Woods, Randall (2006). LBJ: Architect of American Ambition. New York: Free Press. ISBN 978-0684834580.
  64. Zarefsky, David. President Johnson's War on Poverty (1986).
  65. Califano Jr., Joseph A. (October 1999). "What Was Really Great About The Great Society: The truth behind the conservative myths". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on March 26, 2014.
  66. Zachary A. Goldfarb (December 9, 2013). Study: U.S. poverty rate decreased over past half-century thanks to safety-net programs. The Washington Post.
  67. Bookbinder, Hyman (August 20, 1989). "Did the War on Poverty Fail?". The New York Times.
  68. Martha J. Bailey and Sheldon Danziger (eds.), Legacies of the War on Poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2013. ISBN 9780871540072.
  69. Annelise Orleck and Lisa Gayle Hazirjian (eds.), The War on Poverty: A New Grassroots History, 1964–1980. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2011. ISBN 9780820339498.