American society in the 1920s

De Baripedia

Based on a lecture by Aline Helg[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

The 1920s, also known as the 'Roaring Twenties', was a decade of great social, cultural and economic change in the United States. After the end of the First World War, the country experienced a period of prosperity and optimism, as well as major changes in social norms and values. The rise of the "flapper" culture, in which young women adopted new styles of dress and behaviour, was one of the most remarkable social trends of the decade. The economy was booming and new technologies, such as cars and radios, were becoming widespread. However, the prosperity of the 1920s was not shared by all Americans, as many people, particularly African Americans and immigrants, continued to face discrimination and inequality. In addition, the stock market crash of 1929 marked the end of the decade's prosperity and ushered in the Great Depression.

At the end of the 19th century, the United States moved from annexing territories for colonisation to occupying regions for political and economic control. The Spanish-American War of 1898 marked a major turning point in American imperialism on the American continent. The United States emerged victorious, taking control of Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines and gaining influence over Cuba. The subsequent construction of the Panama Canal solidified American control over the region and provided easier access to Central and South America. The US began to see the Caribbean and Central America as its own sphere of influence. It began to exert political and economic control over these regions by various means, including military intervention, economic aid and diplomatic pressure.

World War I, also known as the First World War, brought great destruction and ruin to Europe and had a profound impact on the global balance of power. The war marked the end of European domination and the rise of the United States as a major world power. The United States entered the war in 1917, and its participation was decisive in turning the tide against the Central Powers. The war also ended the British Empire's status as the dominant world power, and the United States became the world's leading economic and military power. With the end of the war, the United States assumed a more prominent role in international affairs, and its economic and military power enabled it to exert a significant influence on world affairs. The idea of the white man's burden, a term used to describe the belief that it was the duty of the European powers and the United States to 'civilise' the rest of the world, was also prominent in US foreign policy during this period.

There are similarities between cultural and artistic developments in the United States in the 1920s and in Mexico at the same time. Both countries were going through a period of significant social and cultural change, and efforts were being made to create a distinct national culture, free from European influences. In the United States, the 'Roaring Twenties' saw the rise of jazz music, the Harlem Renaissance and the emergence of a new generation of writers, artists and intellectuals who sought to create a distinct American culture. Similarly, in Mexico, the 1920s and 1930s were a period of cultural and artistic flowering known as the 'Mexican Renaissance'. Mexican artists and intellectuals sought to create a national culture that reflected Mexico's indigenous and mestizo heritage. They also rejected the European influence on Mexican art and culture. This movement was led by figures such as Diego Rivera, Frida Kahlo and David Alfaro Siqueiros, who sought to promote a new national identity through their art and literature.

The second industrial revolution[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The first industrial revolution, from the late 18th to the early 19th century, was marked by major technological advances in textiles, metallurgy and transport. These innovations replaced manual labour with mechanisation, boosting productivity, economic growth and prosperity. Although this revolution first emerged in the United Kingdom, profoundly transforming its economy and society, its effects and innovations quickly spread to other parts of the world, paving the way for subsequent industrial upheavals in countries such as the United States over the following decades.

Following on from the first wave of industrialisation, the second industrial revolution, which took off at the end of the 19th century, propelled the world into an era of unprecedented technological progress. While capitalising on the initial advances, this period saw the emergence of revolutionary technologies: steel became the material of choice, electricity redefined ways of living and producing, and the field of chemistry opened up previously unexplored horizons. The telegraph, the telephone and the internal combustion engine are just some of the landmark inventions that shaped this era. In the United States and elsewhere, new industries such as the automobile and petrochemicals not only boosted the economy, but also profoundly influenced society. Urban centres grew at a breathtaking pace, means of transport were transformed and, with them, entire lifestyles, combining work, travel and entertainment.

The First World War, which ended in 1918, not only changed the face of warfare but also overturned the global economic and political order. The battlefields of Europe, devastated by new methods of warfare, witnessed unprecedented destruction and a tragic loss of life. Great European powers, once proud and dominant, were left bereft, both physically and economically, by the horrors of war. The United States, although it joined the conflict later, was spared much of the devastation. Its late intervention and the distance of its coasts from the main theatres of war spared it from large-scale destruction. As a result, in the aftermath of the war, the United States emerged not only as a military power, but also as an economic giant, in stark contrast to the ravaged landscape of Europe.

"While the second industrial revolution had already appeared before the First World War, the conflict served as a catalyst for many technological innovations. The United States, with its solid infrastructure and entrepreneurial spirit, was ideally placed to exploit these advances. In the 1920s, this synergy between innovation and opportunity propelled the US economy to new heights. Sectors such as manufacturing and transport experienced phenomenal growth, while new industries, notably the automotive and chemical industries, emerged, redefining the economic landscape. Unlike Europe, which was largely ravaged by the ravages of war, the United States remained largely sheltered from its direct impact. This advantageous position, combined with its industrial strength, enabled the United States to establish itself as the world's leading economic power at the time.

The United States enjoyed a unique combination of advantages that predisposed it to economic domination in the 20th century. With a vast and growing domestic market, a treasure trove of natural resources and a solid, modern infrastructure, it was ideally positioned to become the world's locomotive for the production of goods and services. But their rise was not limited to the economy. The decisive role they played in the First World War not only strengthened their military and political stature, but also consolidated their influence on the international stage. These elements, combined with their economic power, solidified the United States' place as the undisputed superpower of the 20th century.

Mass-production of consumer goods[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

Ford T assembly line in 1913. A swing enables a sub-assembly from a higher floor to be presented to the workstation where it will be fitted to the vehicle.

The Second Industrial Revolution, which began at the end of the 19th century, marked a period of profound transformation in the way products were manufactured and consumed. As well as major advances in the production of steel, electricity and chemicals, this era saw the introduction of revolutionary technologies such as the telephone, the internal combustion engine and the electrification of cities. The advent of mass production techniques, popularised by figures such as Henry Ford and his Model T, not only boosted production capacity, but also made goods more affordable for a larger proportion of the population. As a result, the daily lives of the average consumer were transformed, with increased access to goods previously considered luxuries. It also stimulated economic growth and laid the foundations for the modern consumer society.

Henry Ford stands out as one of the emblematic figures of the second industrial revolution, particularly for his revolutionary adoption of the assembly line to manufacture cars. His Model T was not just a car; it was the symbol of a new era of production. By using the assembly line, Ford was able to produce vehicles more efficiently and at a lower cost, making the automobile accessible not just to the elite, but to the vast majority of Americans. This democratisation of the automobile transformed the infrastructure of the United States, encouraging suburban growth, changing work and leisure patterns and, more generally, shaping the country's socio-economic fabric. In essence, Ford didn't just change the car industry; he redefined the American way of life.

The techniques of mass production, once tried and tested in the car industry, quickly found their application in a multitude of other industrial sectors. From household appliances to cigarettes and clothing, a vast range of products became accessible to a large proportion of the population. The low cost of these goods, combined with their abundance, facilitated the birth of a culture where buying was no longer just a necessity, but also a form of expression and a pastime. This consumer culture reshaped the economic and social landscape. Companies began to invest significantly in advertising to attract consumers, creating a ubiquitous advertising industry. Consumer credit also became commonplace, allowing households to buy goods beyond their immediate means, while stimulating demand and production. The assembly line, while an emblem of industrial efficiency, also became the symbol of an era in which consumption became central to the American economy and culture. Today, even with the emergence of new technologies and manufacturing methods, the legacy of mass production persists, testifying to its profound and lasting impact on society.

The Second Industrial Revolution, spanning the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, was catalysed by an unprecedented drive to improve industrial productivity, reduce costs and optimise manufacturing processes. To achieve these ambitions, major innovations emerged, profoundly marking the industrial landscape. The assembly line, popularised by figures such as Henry Ford, not only revolutionised car production, but also established a new paradigm for mass production in many other sectors. Interchangeable parts reinforced this trend, ensuring the consistency and quality of finished products while minimising waste and errors. Meanwhile, the introduction of electricity revolutionised traditional production methods, providing a more efficient and versatile source of energy, and enabling continuous operations without reliance on daylight or more rudimentary power sources. All these innovations converged on a single vision: to transform the way goods were produced, creating an era of industrial prosperity, growth and innovation.

The assembly line was a revolution in the industrial world. It introduced an efficient and specialised division of labour, where each worker, rather than building a product from start to finish, was responsible for a specific stage of production. This specialisation made it possible to speed up the manufacturing process considerably, increasing production volume while ensuring consistent quality. Interchangeable parts reinforced this dynamic. They eliminated the need for each part to be custom-made, facilitating mass production and guaranteeing product consistency and reliability. Not only could goods be produced on a large scale, but their repair and maintenance were also simplified, since a faulty part could easily be replaced by another. At the same time, the emergence of electricity as the main source of energy revolutionised industry. It enabled the mechanisation of previously manual processes, freeing up labour for other tasks and allowing continuous production, independent of the constraints of natural light or the power of steam engines. This change led to unprecedented levels of productivity, propelling industries into a new era of efficiency and innovation.

With the emergence of new media such as radio and, later, television, advertising took on a new dimension. Companies began to reach a much wider audience, adapting their advertising messages to be more sophisticated and geared towards a broad public. At the same time, mass production led to product standardisation. To stand out in a saturated market, companies created distinct brands for their products. These brands emphasised elements such as quality, unique features or the lifestyle associated with a particular product. In addition, the challenge of distributing goods produced in large quantities led to changes in the retail landscape. Chain shops and department stores have emerged, serving as key outlets for reaching large numbers of consumers and facilitating their access to products. At the same time, consumer credit became an essential tool for stimulating demand. It enabled consumers to buy expensive products, such as cars or household appliances, by offering them the possibility of repaying the cost over an extended period. Finally, it became clear to businesses that if they were to prosper, they needed to adopt a customer-centric approach. This prompted them to invest in market research, surveys and focus groups to better understand consumers' wants and needs. This customer-centric approach, combined with lower production costs, created a virtuous circle for the economy, with cheaper and more accessible products stimulating demand and, in turn, increased production and market expansion.

The widespread adoption of mass production and efficiency during the second industrial revolution profoundly transformed the labour market. One of the direct consequences was a substantial increase in the number of jobs in the manufacturing sector. Factories engaged in large-scale production needed more workers to operate the machines, provide maintenance and manage the production flow. This period saw the rise of the working class. People from rural areas, attracted by the promise of stable employment and a regular income, migrated to urban centres, increasing the size and influence of this class. Industrial towns grew up around the factories, and the urban landscape was transformed by the rapid expansion of residential areas to house these workers. However, despite the apparent economic advantages of mass production, it also had its disadvantages. Working conditions in the factories were often difficult. Days were long, wages low and safety conditions precarious. This exploitation of labour led to a series of strikes and protests among workers. In the face of these injustices, workers' unions grew in strength and influence. These organisations were formed to protect workers' rights, negotiate better wages, working conditions and benefits. Their rise to power marked a period of intense confrontation between capital and labour, leading to legislative and social changes that laid the foundations of modern labour rights.

Henry Ford is undoubtedly one of the emblematic figures of the second industrial revolution. A visionary, he understood the importance of combining efficiency, speed and reduced costs to transform the car industry and, by extension, the American way of life. By radically rethinking the way cars were produced, Ford opted for an innovative approach. He created large factories, at the cutting edge of technology at the time, which were designed to optimise every stage of the production process. By incorporating the latest technological advances, these plants became models of efficiency, emphasising continuous, methodical production. However, Ford's most significant innovation was undoubtedly the introduction of the assembly line. Rather than building a car from A to Z in one place, each car progressed along a line where workers, and sometimes machines, had specialised tasks. Each stage of construction was therefore simplified, which drastically increased the speed of production. With the introduction of this technique, the time needed to build a car fell from twelve hours to less than two and a half. As a result, production costs also fell, enabling Ford to sell its cars at a much more affordable price to the general public. The Model T, in particular, has become the archetypal affordable car. The impact of these innovations was not limited to the car industry. The assembly line has become a pillar of industrial production, influencing sectors as diverse as electronics, food and textiles. By rethinking the way products were made, Henry Ford not only changed the car industry; he redefined modern production.

On the assembly line, the approach was radically different from traditional manufacturing methods. Instead of one worker building a car from scratch, each worker specialised in a specific task. As the car made its way down the line, each worker repeated his assigned task over and over again, with greater precision and speed. This specialisation turned each worker into an expert in his field. They knew every detail of their task, enabling them to carry it out quickly and efficiently. The result of this division of labour was staggering: an exponential increase in the speed and volume of production. In comparison, in the traditional model, a worker worked on a car in its entirety. Although this method gave the worker a complete view of the finished product, it was far less efficient. The adoption of the assembly line by Ford and other industries therefore marked a revolution, not only in the way production was carried out, but also in the very conception of factory work.

Henry Ford introduced a series of innovations that revolutionised the car industry and other sectors. The standardisation of components and accessories for the Model T is a major example. By standardising parts, Ford was able to simplify and streamline the production process. This meant fewer variations in the manufacturing process, allowing each car to pass more quickly down the assembly line. Mass production, made possible by this standardisation, led to significant economies of scale. By producing in large quantities, costs per unit fell considerably, enabling Ford to offer the Model T at a much more affordable price. This opened the door to a whole new class of consumers who could now own a car, something that had previously been considered a luxury. The use of interchangeable parts had other tangible benefits for car owners. If a part deteriorated or broke down, it could be easily replaced by a new one, without the need to customise it for a specific vehicle. This made car maintenance and repair cheaper and more accessible. In short, Ford's vision and relentless pursuit of efficiency not only revolutionised car production, but also transformed consumers' relationship with their vehicles.

The assembly line and mass production methods revolutionised the way goods were produced. With the establishment of large industrial plants, the need for labour increased dramatically, giving rise to a strong working class. However, conditions in these factories were often harsh and difficult. Workers were subjected to long and exhausting working hours, performing repetitive and monotonous tasks. This led to a form of labour exploitation, where workers were often underpaid and worked in dangerous conditions. Faced with these conditions, workers began to organise to fight for their rights. This led to the rise of workers' unions, organisations that sought to negotiate better conditions, higher wages and shorter working hours for their members. Strikes and demonstrations were common as workers and unions tried to highlight their situation and force factory owners to make improvements. At the same time, the assembly line created a new type of worker: the semi-skilled labourer. Unlike artisans or highly skilled professionals who mastered a complete set of skills to produce a product, semi-skilled workers were trained to perform a single specific task in the production process. While this made the production process more efficient, it also reduced the versatility and independence of workers, making them dependent on the production line for their employment. Over time, the constant drive to increase efficiency and reduce costs led to the introduction of the first industrial robots. These machines were capable of performing repetitive tasks at a speed and with a precision that humans could not match. While this led to even greater improvements in efficiency, it also raised questions about the future of work and the role of workers in the production process.

The assembly line has transformed the industrial landscape. The basic principles of the assembly line - division of labour, specialisation of tasks and mechanisation - were easily transposable to almost all forms of production. It enabled large-scale production, product uniformity and a significant reduction in production time. With Henry Ford's resounding success in the car industry, other industries were quick to adopt this model. In the household appliance industry, for example, the assembly line enabled refrigerators, washing machines and other appliances to be mass-produced, thereby reducing their cost to the end consumer. In the electronics industry, it has meant faster, more efficient production of items such as radios, televisions and, later, computers. Similarly, in the clothing industry, mass production standardised the size and style of clothes, enabling faster production methods and wider distribution. As well as increasing productivity, the assembly line has also led to lower product costs. Mass production meant that fixed costs were spread over a greater number of units, resulting in lower unit costs. Consumers benefited from these savings in the form of lower prices, which in turn stimulated demand, leading to even greater growth in production and a prosperous economy. In this way, the assembly line, initially developed for the automotive industry, proved to be a versatile innovation that transformed the way products were manufactured in a multitude of industries, laying the foundations for the modern consumer society.

The increase in mass production gave rise to a new challenge: how to dispose of the huge stocks of manufactured products? The answer was found in the development of sophisticated marketing and advertising strategies. Previously, the main aim of companies had been to produce goods, but now they also had to convince consumers to buy these products in large quantities. It was at this time that advertising became an industry in its own right, with the rise of advertising agencies, marketing specialists and communications professionals. Advertisements, broadcast by radio, cinema and, later, television, became omnipresent in the lives of Americans. They presented products not only as objects of desire, but also as symbols of social status and success. Programmed obsolescence, the idea that products should be designed to have a limited lifespan in order to encourage consumers to replace them regularly, also took off. This strategy has been adopted by many companies, who have begun to produce 'improved' versions of their products at regular intervals, encouraging consumers to constantly update their possessions. At the same time, the increasing availability of credit enabled consumers to buy products even if they didn't have the immediate funds to pay for them. This not only boosted sales, but also helped to further entrench consumer culture, as owning the latest fashionable product became a key indicator of personal status and success. Overall, the combination of mass production with innovative marketing and advertising techniques created a consumer-based economy, where an individual's value was often measured by what they owned, rather than what they did or who they were as a person.

The dynamics of the twentieth century, especially after the Second World War, saw the rise of the middle class in many industrialised countries, particularly the United States. This unprecedented economic growth was largely fuelled by mass consumption. Marketing and advertising strategies, by making consumers want products that they did not already have, played a key role in stimulating this demand. Effective advertising campaigns created a sense of urgency and need, transforming yesterday's luxuries into today's necessities. As a result, the increased demand for these products stimulated industrial production. Factories, operating at full capacity, required large workforces. Manufacturing became a central pillar of the economy, providing jobs for millions of people. However, the repetitive and often dangerous nature of these jobs, coupled with the pressure to maximise profits and minimise costs, led to the exploitation of workers. Faced with difficult working conditions, inadequate pay and long hours, workers came together to form trade unions. These organisations sought to bargain collectively for better conditions, higher wages and social benefits. Confrontations between unions and company managers sometimes led to strikes, lock-outs and even violence.

The rise of consumer culture in the United States in the twentieth century had a profound impact on societal values and attitudes. As the economy prospered, the ability to buy and own goods became not only a symbol of success, but also a measure of personal happiness and achievement. Advertising, in particular, played a major role in shaping how Americans perceived the value of material goods. The messages conveyed by advertising suggested that owning the latest fashionable product or technological gadget could improve quality of life, increase social status or even offer some form of personal fulfilment. Consumerism has become so ingrained in American culture that many social events and traditions, such as holidays and birthdays, have become closely linked to the act of buying and giving. Black Friday, for example, has become almost as iconic as Thanksgiving itself. This shift in values has also had a wider impact on society. The emphasis on material possessions has amplified the notion of individual success, sometimes to the detriment of community or collective values. In addition, the constant pressure to acquire and consume has led to high levels of debt for many households. However, this consumer culture has also led to countless innovations and an improved quality of life for many Americans. The affordability of goods and services, from cars to appliances to travel, has increased considerably over the years.

Boom in the US economy[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The Second Industrial Revolution, which took off at the end of the nineteenth century and extended into the early twentieth century, fundamentally transformed the American economy. This period saw the introduction and rapid adoption of technologies such as electricity, large-scale steel production, the automobile, and long-distance communications such as the telephone. One of the most revolutionary changes was the introduction of the assembly line by Henry Ford. By standardising the production process and dividing work into individual, specialised tasks, factories were able to produce goods at unprecedented speed and volume. Ford's Model T, produced using these techniques, became a symbol of this new era of production. Not only did it transform the car industry, but it made the car accessible to millions of Americans, changing the urban landscape and lifestyles. Increased productivity has also brought down the cost of production for many goods. This made these products more affordable to the average consumer, increasing demand and further stimulating economic growth. As a result, the 1920s became known as the 'Roaring Twenties', a period of economic expansion, innovation and cultural optimism. What's more, this rapid economic growth led to urbanisation, as more and more people moved to the cities to find work in the new factories. Cities began to grow rapidly, offering new jobs, entertainment and opportunities.

The period following the Second Industrial Revolution, particularly the 1920s, is often referred to as the 'Roaring Twenties' because of the unprecedented prosperity it brought to the United States. The meteoric growth of the American economy during this decade is largely attributed to the adoption of new technologies, mechanisation, mass production methods and innovation. The impressive 40% increase in US GDP reflects the rapid expansion of the country's industrial and service sectors. Companies have benefited from enormous productivity gains, which have contributed to the overall growth of the economy. What's more, this rise in GNP has translated into a tangible increase in living standards for many Americans, as evidenced by the 30% rise in average annual per capita income. The increase in per capita income enabled Americans to buy innovative new products that became available during this period. Items such as cars, radios and household appliances became commonplace in American homes. Prosperity also led to the emergence of a new popular culture, marked by jazz, cinema and other forms of entertainment. The population explosion of the 1920s also reflected a combination of factors. Natural population growth, stimulated by a high birth rate and falling mortality, was complemented by continued immigration, although immigration laws were tightened during this period. In addition, rapid urbanisation was a major phenomenon of the 1920s. Many Americans moved from rural areas to cities, attracted by the promise of jobs in booming factories and industries, as well as by new opportunities and the urban lifestyle.

The economic boom of the 1920s in the United States created a virtuous circle for the economy. As companies innovated and produced goods more cheaply, the prices of consumer goods fell, making them accessible to more Americans. These price reductions, combined with rising incomes and increased confidence in the economy, encouraged consumers to spend more. Americans of this era also benefited from financial innovations, such as the ability to buy on credit. Instalment buying, where consumers could buy a good now and pay later with a low interest rate, became a popular method of buying expensive goods such as cars or household appliances. This ease of access to credit further boosted demand, as it enabled more people to buy goods they would not otherwise have been able to afford. The increase in demand for goods and services naturally led to job creation. Companies had to hire more workers to meet this growing demand. Factories ran at full capacity, hiring thousands of workers to produce everything from cars to radios. What's more, the service sector also grew, from retail services to financial services, reflecting the increasing complexity of the modern economy. This consumer craze has also led to changes in consumer habits and values. Marketing and advertising have become major industries, using increasingly sophisticated techniques to persuade Americans to buy the latest products. Brands and consumerism became central to everyday life, creating a culture where value and status were often linked to the possession of goods. However, despite these positive trends, economic inequality persisted, with many Americans still living in poverty or facing economic hardship. In addition, the emphasis on consumerism and credit contributed to the fragility of the economy, which, combined with other factors, led to the stock market crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression.

The stock market crash of 1929 ended the boom of the 1920s and plunged the United States, and the world, into one of the worst economic crises in history. This sudden inversion of the economic curve came as a shock to a country that had become accustomed to sustained growth and seemingly endless prosperity. The causes of the Great Depression are many and complex, but several key factors played a role. Firstly, excessive speculation on the stock market, fuelled by easy access to credit, created a financial bubble. When it burst, thousands of investors lost everything, and confidence in the economy was severely shaken. Banks, which had invested their depositors' money in the stock market, began to fail at an alarming rate, triggering a credit crisis. The economic problems were exacerbated by inadequate government policies. Instead of stimulating the economy, the government initially adopted a protectionist approach, as with the Tariff Act of 1930 (also known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act), which increased tariffs on many imported products. This led to retaliation by other countries, resulting in a drastic reduction in international trade, which exacerbated the recession. The social impact of the Great Depression was profound. Unemployment reached an all-time high, affecting almost a quarter of the working population. Thousands of people lost their homes, their savings and their dignity. Shanty towns, nicknamed "Hoovervilles" after President Herbert Hoover, sprang up across the country, populated by those who had lost everything. It was only in the 1930s, with the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt and the introduction of his New Deal programme, that measures were taken to stimulate the economy and provide a safety net for affected citizens. Large-scale infrastructure projects, financial regulations and social programmes were put in place to mitigate the effects of the crisis and prevent a similar catastrophe in the future. Although the New Deal brought some relief, it was ultimately the war effort for the Second World War that truly revitalised the US economy, as the transition to a war economy led to a massive increase in production and employment. Nevertheless, the Great Depression remains a dark chapter and a crucial lesson in the fragility of economic systems.

The economic boom of the 1920s, often referred to as the Roaring Twenties, was a period of unprecedented opulence and growth in the United States. Rapid industrialisation, stimulated by technological innovations and mass production techniques, had a profound impact on the American economy and, consequently, on the well-being of workers. One of the most notable consequences of this period was the rise in real wages. With the rise of mass production, particularly in industries such as the car industry, the demand for skilled labour increased. These industries needed large numbers of workers to operate the new assembly lines and production facilities. To attract and retain this workforce, companies were forced to offer better wages. Henry Ford, for example, shocked the industry in 1914 by almost doubling the minimum daily wage for his workers to $5 a day. While this was partly to attract and retain the best talent, it was also intended to enable workers to buy the cars they produced, thereby stimulating demand. This increase in wages, combined with the reduction in working hours, had a positive impact on workers' morale and productivity. Higher wages did not just benefit workers in the industry. It has had a knock-on effect on the economy as a whole. With higher wages, workers could afford to buy more goods and services, stimulating domestic demand and encouraging other industries to grow.

Rising wages for workers, coupled with mass production, created a virtuous circle for the US economy during the 1920s. As workers could now afford to buy more products, there was an increase in demand for those same products, fuelling economic growth. Henry Ford illustrated this idea perfectly with his $5-a-day wage increase for his workers. This was not just an altruistic gesture, but also a shrewd business strategy. By increasing the purchasing power of its employees, Ford ensured that they were also potential customers for its cars. This had the effect of strengthening demand for the product they were making. The increased purchasing power of industrial workers and the availability of consumer goods at affordable prices stimulated demand. Radios, refrigerators, washing machines and other household products became common items in American homes. In addition, the increasing ease of access to credit has enabled more Americans to buy expensive goods, such as cars and houses. With demand constantly on the rise, companies have had to hire more workers, boosting employment in the manufacturing sector. In addition, with the expansion of infrastructure, such as roads and utilities, jobs have also been created in the service and construction sectors. This growth of a consumer-led economy marked a major transformation in American society. Consumer values and behaviour changed, with the possession of material goods becoming a symbol of success and social status.

The prosperity of the 1920s masked deep and persistent disparities in American society. Although the American economy grew at an unprecedented rate during this period, not all Americans benefited from this growth. African-Americans, immigrants and other marginalised groups were often excluded from the economic benefits of this era, largely as a result of racial and ethnic discrimination. Despite general economic advances, these groups often held lower-paying jobs and had limited access to economic opportunities. Jim Crow laws in the South, for example, prevented many African Americans from voting or accessing quality jobs and education. Similarly, immigrants, particularly those who were non-Anglo-Saxon and non-European, were often relegated to low-paid jobs and faced widespread xenophobia. Economic inequality was also exacerbated by government policies that often favoured the interests of the wealthiest companies and individuals. For example, tax cuts for the rich and deregulation have often disproportionately benefited the wealthiest. The stock market crash of 1929 highlighted these inequalities. As the market crashed, many ordinary Americans, who had invested their savings in the hope of continued prosperity, saw their wealth evaporate almost overnight. The ensuing Great Depression had a devastating impact on American society as a whole, but it disproportionately affected already marginalised groups. The combination of economic collapse and pre-existing inequalities created a profound social and economic crisis. This eventually led to government intervention in the form of Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal in the 1930s, which sought to remedy some of the worst injustices and inequalities and stabilise the US economy.

Chart 1: USA GDP annual pattern and long-term trend, 1920-40, in billions of constant dollars[8]

Costs and social consequences[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The second industrial revolution, while stimulating significant economic growth and prosperity in urban areas of the United States in the 1920s, also profoundly affected rural areas. Technological advances, while beneficial to industry, brought their share of challenges to farming communities. The mechanisation of agriculture, for example, introduced machines such as the tractor and the combine harvester, making manual labour less necessary. This increased efficiency has led to overproduction of certain crops, flooding the market and driving down prices for agricultural products, making it difficult for many farmers to generate profits. To add to their distress, many had gone into debt to acquire these new technologies, hoping that this would increase their yields and therefore their profitability. But with prices falling, paying off these debts became a challenge. Economic tension in rural areas has encouraged significant migration to urban areas. Attracted by the promise of better-paid jobs and an urban lifestyle, many, particularly young people, left their rural homes. This has often left rural areas devoid of their dynamism and youth, leading to a change in social structure. Small family farms began to disappear, replaced by larger farming operations. This reduction in population also affected small businesses and schools, which closed, further changing the fabric of rural communities. While the 1920s are often seen as a period of prosperity, the reality is that many rural communities were in crisis long before the stock market crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression.

The rise of manufacturing and service industries in urban areas during the Second Industrial Revolution brought tangible improvements to the daily lives of many Americans. Thanks to these flourishing industries, wages rose, enabling a large proportion of the urban population to achieve a previously unimaginable standard of living. Yet despite the apparent economic optimism in urban centres, prosperity was far from evenly distributed across the country. If we delve into the details of incomes, we can see clear disparities. Industrial workers in urban areas, for example, earned an average annual income of 680 dollars. This sum, although insignificant by today's standards, represented a respectable sum at the time and allowed these workers to enjoy a certain degree of comfort. By contrast, the contrast is stark when we look at the incomes of farmers and rural workers, who received an average annual income of just $273. This considerable difference in income not only reflects the economic inequality between urban and rural areas, but also reflects the challenges faced by farmers at the time, including overproduction, falling food prices and the debt incurred by the purchase of farm machinery.

The marked difference between rural and urban incomes created a powerful driver for migration. Spurred on by the promise of a better future, millions of small farmers have left their land and communities behind and ventured to the bustling urban centres. Hoping to find better-paid jobs and a more prosperous life, they became the dynamic workforce that fuelled the industrial machine of the cities. However, this massive population shift was not without consequences. While the cities grew rapidly, expanding their borders and multiplying their need for infrastructure and services, rural areas were gradually deserted. Farms that had once thrived were now often abandoned or sold to larger agricultural enterprises. Beyond the physical and economic transformations, this migration profoundly changed the social and cultural fabric of the country. In the cities, the convergence of different cultural and social groups gave rise to new forms of art, music and literature, while posing new challenges in terms of cohabitation and integration. Meanwhile, in rural areas, declining populations have led to an erosion of local traditions and a breakdown in community ties. As a result, this period of migration not only redefined the economic and demographic landscape of the United States, but also indelibly shaped the nation's cultural and social identity.

The drive towards mass production and the unbridled search for efficiency during the Second Industrial Revolution undoubtedly generated considerable economic prosperity. However, this quest for rapid growth has often overlooked the environmental consequences. Indeed, in a world where immediate profit and expansion were priorities, environmental protection and the conservation of natural resources were often not central concerns. This neglect manifested itself in many ways. Factories dumped their waste into rivers and lakes, polluting the water and killing aquatic wildlife. Air quality deteriorated due to massive smoke and soot emissions. Forests were cleared at an alarming rate to meet the growing demand for raw materials and space for industrial expansion. Mineral resources were extracted without any consideration for the landscape or the sustainability of these resources. As a result, future generations have inherited an altered landscape, where ecological damage has often been irreversible. Environmental problems such as soil degradation, erosion and loss of biodiversity have been exacerbated by this period of rapid industrialisation. Today, we are still confronted with the consequences of this period. Challenges such as climate change, air and water pollution, and deforestation are direct legacies of this era of unrestricted mass production. It is crucial to learn from this history to balance economic development and environmental protection to ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.

The automation and mechanisation of production processes has reduced the need for human labour in many areas. Previously, a task might have required several workers, but with the introduction of more advanced machinery, a smaller number of workers could perform the same task, making many jobs obsolete. In addition, rapid urbanisation and the migration of rural populations to cities in search of jobs has created a glut of labour in some regions. This increased competition for jobs not only led to higher unemployment, but also put downward pressure on wages, as employers knew they could easily replace disgruntled workers. The specialisation of tasks on the assembly line also created a less versatile workforce. Unlike traditional craftsmen who mastered many skills and could move between different jobs, assembly line workers were often trained to perform a single specific task. If that task was automated or became obsolete, they found themselves without transferable skills to look for another job. The centralisation of production in large factories also led to the closure of small local businesses that could not compete on price or efficiency. These businesses were often the mainstay of small communities, and their closure led to job losses and economic decline in many areas.

The recession of 1921 is often overshadowed by the extraordinary period of prosperity that followed it, but it was one of the most acute recessions in American history, albeit a relatively short one. The causes of this recession were multiple: post-First World War inflation, economic readjustment after the end of the war, and overproduction in certain industries. The post-war period saw a rapid rise in prices due to the enormous demand that had been pent up during the war. When this demand was satisfied, there was an oversupply, particularly in sectors such as the automotive and construction industries. Stocks built up, companies cut back production and redundancies began. High interest rates, introduced to combat inflation, also contributed to slowing investment and consumption. However, the response of the government and the Federal Reserve to this recession was very different from that of subsequent crises. The authorities mainly allowed the necessary adjustments to take place in the economy, rather than intervening on a massive scale. Costs were cut, efficiency improved and unprofitable businesses closed. Although painful in the short term, this laid the foundations for a robust recovery. The rest of the decade saw impressive economic growth, fuelled by innovation, credit expansion and increased confidence in the economy. However, this rapid growth masked some of the underlying problems and imbalances that eventually manifested themselves in the stock market crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression. The contrast between the recession of 1921 and the explosive growth of the following years offers an important lesson about the cyclicality of the economy and the need to be alert to early signs of instability, even in times of prosperity.

The Great Depression of the 20th century remains one of the most traumatic economic events not only for the United States but for many parts of the world. It had a profound impact on the society, politics and culture of the time. The origins of the Depression were multifactorial and intertwined. Beyond the factors identified, the structure of the financial system played a major role. Most banks were susceptible to chain failures. When one financial institution collapsed, it triggered a domino effect, jeopardising all the other banks with which it was linked. In addition, the Federal Reserve's failure to respond adequately to the contraction in the money supply exacerbated the recessionary situation. The protectionist climate of the time, embodied in measures such as the Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930, which raised tariffs on imports, limited international trade, exacerbating the depression at home and abroad. In agriculture, the 1920s were marked by overproduction. Farmers produced in excess of demand, leading to falling prices and numerous bankruptcies. In addition, after the First World War, the nations of Europe were heavily indebted to the United States. When American creditors began to restrict credit and demand repayment, this put enormous strain on European economies. In the face of this depression, the government response was unparalleled. Franklin D. Roosevelt, then President, launched the New Deal, a series of initiatives designed to offer relief to the victims, reinvigorate the economy and prevent future depressions. The result was a colossal expansion of the federal government's role in the economy. Despite these efforts, however, economic recovery was slow. In the end, it was the involvement of the United States in the Second World War that served as the catalyst for the real recovery, propelling a depressed economy towards the status of global economic superpower.

The Second Industrial Revolution saw the advent of new kinds of corporate structures. In this new era of mass production and maximised efficiency, companies that were able to invest massively in new technologies and take advantage of economies of scale became dominant on the market. The centralisation of production in vast factories led to unprecedented efficiency. Assembly lines, popularised by the likes of Henry Ford, enabled rapid, standardised production at lower cost. As a result, products from these factories were cheaper to produce and often sold at more competitive prices than those from small producers. The rise of the oligopolies was also strengthened by easier access to resources. Not only did these companies have the capital to invest in research, development and the implementation of innovations, but they also enjoyed privileged relationships with suppliers, extensive distribution networks and considerable political influence. These competitive advantages made it extremely difficult for smaller companies to compete on the same ground. What's more, these industrial giants, with their considerable resources, have been able to engage in aggressive commercial practices to stifle competition. Whether through underpricing, buying out competitors or setting up exclusive agreements with distributors, these large companies have often used their power to dominate and sometimes monopolise their respective markets.

The relationship between the oligopolies and the government has, on many occasions, been characterised by mutually beneficial collaboration. In the years following the second industrial revolution, many large companies benefited from some form of government support. The repression of the trade union movement is a striking example. In many cases, when workers tried to organise to fight for better wages and working conditions, they were met with significant resistance, not only from their employers, but also from the authorities. For example, during major strikes, the police were often mobilised to intervene in favour of employers' interests, sometimes using force against the strikers. In addition, the government introduced tariff policies designed to protect domestic industry from foreign competition. For example, the Tariff Act of 1890, also known as the McKinley Tariff, considerably increased customs duties on imports. This policy, while justified by the desire to protect American workers and encourage domestic production, also had the effect of protecting oligopolies from foreign competitors, enabling them to maintain higher prices and make greater profits. These customs barriers limited the effectiveness of foreign competition and offered a substantial advantage to domestic companies, allowing them to increase their market share and strengthen their dominant position.

The concentration of economic power within these oligopolies has radically transformed the American economic landscape. Indeed, with such market dominance, these large companies have often had the latitude to set prices, determine working conditions and exercise considerable influence over policy and legislation. Smaller companies, faced with these giants, have found it difficult to compete. Faced with higher production costs and a reduced ability to negotiate with suppliers and distributors, many have been forced to close down or be absorbed by larger entities. This market concentration has consequently led to the disappearance of many small businesses, reducing the diversity of the commercial landscape and limiting choice for consumers. On the employment front, large companies have become the main employers. While they often offered higher wages than small businesses, they also tended to favour mass production methods and standardised employment practices. This, coupled with their relentless pursuit of profits, often led to difficult working conditions. The days were long, the conditions often dangerous, and there were few guarantees for workers. Faced with this exploitation, the working class felt the need to unite to defend its rights. It was against this backdrop that the workers' unions grew. They sought to bargain collectively for better wages, shorter working hours and safer working conditions. Tensions between unions and business owners were frequent, and many major strikes and clashes took place during this period, reflecting the struggle for power and justice in an era dominated by big business interests.

The growing influence of the oligopolies in American society extended far beyond their commercial operations. Thanks to their massive financial resources, these companies have been able to exert significant influence on politics. They have often lobbied legislators, financed political campaigns and advocated policies that would favour their interests. The close links between these companies and government have sometimes led to what is known as a 'revolving door', where business leaders become government officials, and vice versa. This intertwining of corporate interests and politics naturally raised concerns about the true democratic nature of the American political process. Critics argued that the voice of the average citizen was drowned out by the noise of campaign dollars and the powerful lobbying machines deployed by these corporations. However, there have also been benefits for the consumer. Oligopolies, thanks to their economies of scale, were able to produce goods at lower costs. This efficiency often translated into lower prices for consumer goods, making them more accessible to more people. This meant that, even though economic power was concentrated, the majority of Americans could enjoy an improved standard of living in terms of access to basic goods and services. Nevertheless, the juxtaposition of this increased accessibility to goods with the growing concentration of economic and political power created a complex dynamic. While on the one hand consumers benefited from cheaper goods and a wider range of products, on the other they found themselves in an environment where the concentration of economic power could potentially erode the democratic foundations of society.

With the emergence of oligopolies, power dynamics began to change. These large companies possessed enormous financial resources, enabling them to exert considerable influence not only on the market but also on politics. The rapid rise of the oligopolies coincided with a period of turbulence for the unions, as these companies took a dim view of the rise of trade unionism and were prepared to use tough tactics to prevent or break strikes and other trade union movements. In addition to their financial resources, these companies often had the tacit or even explicit support of local and federal governments. Court injunctions have sometimes been used to prevent strikes, and the police and even the army have been deployed to suppress demonstrators and strikers. The Ludlow massacre of 1914, when the Colorado National Guard opened fire on a camp of striking miners, is a tragic example. However, the 1920s were particularly difficult for the labour movement. The oligopolies, armed with vast resources and often supported by the government, launched aggressive anti-union campaigns. These efforts were reinforced by a smear campaign often associating trade unions with "subversive activities" or communism, especially after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The fear of communism, or the "Red Scare", was used to discredit trade unions and portray them as threats to American society.

Faced with the rise of the labour movement, many large companies have adopted sophisticated strategies to thwart or co-opt workers' efforts to organise and demand their rights. One of the most common approaches was the establishment of so-called 'company unions'. Unlike independent unions, which represented workers' interests against management, these unions were largely controlled or influenced by the company itself. They were often used to dissuade workers from joining genuine unions, by offering minor concessions while avoiding the structural changes that independent unions might demand. At the same time, in an attempt to defuse workers' grievances and discontent, some companies launched welfare programmes, offering benefits such as subsidised housing, medical care or leisure facilities. While these benefits certainly improved the quality of life for many workers, they were often used strategically to make workers more dependent on the company and less likely to demand their rights or organise independently. Finally, the political connections and power of big business often enabled them to influence government policies in their favour. Whether through lobbying, financial contributions or other means, these companies have often succeeded in obtaining government support to suppress labour movements. Violent action against strikers, the use of legislation to limit the power of trade unions and the portrayal of union leaders as agitators or radicals are all ways in which the government, often under the influence of powerful economic elites, has sought to weaken the labour movement. Overall, the intersection of economic and political power during this period often worked to the detriment of workers and their efforts to achieve justice and fairness in the workplace.

Social capitalism" is a concept that emerged as a response to the growing tensions between workers and employers during the period of rapid industrialisation. It represented an attempt by employers to reduce labour disputes and improve relations with employees without the intervention of outside trade unions. Under these programmes, many companies offered benefits such as higher wages, improved working conditions, health insurance and pension schemes. These benefits were often conditional on loyalty to the company and the absence of union membership. The underlying idea was that if employers could provide a decent standard of living and some security for their employees, then there would be less incentive for them to seek union representation or go on strike. Furthermore, some business leaders saw social capitalism as an opportunity not only to reduce labour tensions, but also to moralise capitalism, by offering a more benevolent view of the employer-employee relationship. However, it is important to note that the success of these programmes has been mixed. Although they benefited some workers, many critics argued that social capitalism mainly served the interests of business by driving workers away from trade unionism and making them dependent on favours from the company. Moreover, these programmes were often limited to certain companies or industries, and many workers were excluded. In the end, although social capitalism brought significant improvements to some workers, it did not replace the need for an independent and powerful trade unionism capable of representing and defending workers' rights against their employers.

Despite attempts by some large corporations to control and appease their workers through "social capitalism" programmes, the labour movement in the United States continued to gain ground and assert itself. Workers recognised the need for collective organisation to effectively assert their rights against powerful corporations. Independent unions offered a counterweight to the growing influence of the oligopolies. Over time, through collective mobilisation, workers have won important victories in terms of employment rights, workplace safety, wages and benefits. Major strikes and demonstrations have highlighted the inequalities and injustices suffered by workers, and have often drawn national and even international attention to their causes. In addition, the trade union movement has played a crucial role in implementing government policies in favour of workers. Legislation such as the Labour Relations Act of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act, strengthened workers' rights to organise and bargain collectively. Over time, trade unions also began to play an active role in national politics, supporting pro-worker candidates and policies. They became a key pillar of the Democratic Party coalition, for example. However, not everything has been easy for the trade union movement. They have faced repression, vilification and legislative obstacles. But despite these challenges, the movement persisted and remained an important force in the American political and social arena.

The assembly line, popularised in particular by Henry Ford and his Model T, represented a revolutionary approach to manufacturing. Workers were no longer responsible for creating a product from scratch, but were assigned a specific, repetitive task along an assembly line. This made it possible to produce goods on a scale and at a speed never seen before. However, it also had profound implications for the very nature of work. Artisans, who possessed specialised skills and made unique products, found their role increasingly marginalised. Their work, once highly valued for its expertise and quality, was now in competition with mass-produced products, often sold at much lower prices. The nuance, individuality and uniqueness that characterised craftsmanship came up against the uniformity and efficiency of mass production. Standardisation has also had an impact on the very nature of the worker. Instead of possessing a range of skills that they could use to make a complete product, assembly line workers often had to perform simple, repetitive tasks. This could lead to feelings of depersonalisation and reduced job satisfaction. Many workers felt alienated by this form of mechanised work, where their role was reduced to a small cog in a vast machine. However, it is important to note that mass production also brought economic benefits. It created many new jobs and made consumer goods more accessible to a large proportion of the population. Products that were once considered luxuries, such as cars, have become widely available, transforming the daily lives of millions of people.

The rise of department stores and retail chains marked a significant change in the way consumers purchased goods. These new forms of retailing offered a variety of products under one roof, often at more competitive prices due to their ability to buy in bulk and benefit from economies of scale. For the consumer, this meant convenience, variety and savings, making these large shops an attractive proposition. Small shops and independent merchants, on the other hand, found it difficult to compete on price. What's more, department stores and retail chains were able to invest more in advertising, product presentation and even creating a distinct shopping experience for the consumer, making it even more difficult for smaller retailers to compete. However, the rise of these retail oligopolies was not without its drawbacks. The standardisation of products and shopping experiences led to a homogenisation of consumer culture. Neighbourhoods and towns lost some of their uniqueness as independent shops disappeared, replaced by recognisable chains offering the same products from one place to another. This centralisation of retailing also had an impact on employment dynamics. While department stores and retail chains created jobs, these were often less personalised and customer-focused than the roles in smaller shops. In addition, with the centralisation of purchasing and stocking decisions, many jobs traditionally associated with retailing, such as independent buyers, saw their role reduced or eliminated. Over time, this dominance by oligopolies has raised concerns about the loss of retail diversity, the impact on local communities and the concentration of economic power. Although consumers have benefited from lower prices and greater convenience, the gradual disappearance of independent trade has been felt by many to be a cultural and economic loss.

The centralisation of economic power in the hands of a few large companies has had profound repercussions on the American economic and social fabric. On the one hand, the ability of these companies to produce and distribute goods in large quantities has made it possible to reduce costs and offer consumers products at more affordable prices. At first sight, this appeared to be a boon for the average consumer, who could now access a range of products previously considered inaccessible or too expensive. However, this apparent abundance and accessibility concealed a more complex reality. The dominance of large companies led to the ousting of many small businesses and artisans, who could not compete in terms of price or distribution reach. These small businesses, often rooted in their local communities, brought not only goods and services, but also economic vitality and diversity to their respective regions. Their decline has led to the closure of shops, the loss of know-how and a loss of local entrepreneurial spirit. What's more, these small businesses and artisans often played an essential role as pillars of the community. Small business owners were much more than just a point of sale; they were often involved in community activities, supported local schools and played an active role in the civic life of their areas. Their demise left a gap that large, profit-driven businesses, often disconnected from local concerns, have not filled. The result has been a homogenisation of the commercial landscape and a reduction in economic diversity. While consumers were able to buy cheaper products, they lost out on choice and customisation. In addition, the reduction in the number of small businesses has weakened the economic resilience of many communities, making some areas more vulnerable to economic shocks. Ultimately, the price of concentrated economic power was measured not just in monetary terms, but also in terms of economic diversity, community vitality and the richness of the American social fabric.

The new urban culture and changing lifestyles[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The 1920s, also known as the 'Roaring Twenties', was a decade of significant social, cultural and economic change in the United States. The period was characterised by a shift from rural life and traditional values to urbanisation and modernity. The emergence of the "New Woman" and "flappers" symbolised the changing social norms and attitudes of the time. Americans were increasingly interested in consumerism and the pursuit of pleasure. The country was experiencing a proliferation of new technologies and new forms of entertainment, such as cars, radio and jazz music. This new urban culture was particularly prevalent in big cities like New York, Chicago and Los Angeles.

The mass production of goods during the 1920s led to a standardisation of products, creating a sense of uniformity among consumers. In addition, the economic boom of the decade was largely driven by consumer spending, and the number of consumers may not have been able to keep pace with the rapid growth in production. This eventually led to an overproduction of goods and a fall in sales, which contributed to the economic recession that began in 1929. The stock market crash of October 1929, which marked the beginning of the Great Depression, further exacerbated the economic problems caused by overproduction.

Mass consumption and consumerism[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

Advertising as an agent of economic development. Advertisement for Palmolive soap in 1922.

The impact of this rise in consumerism has been multidimensional. On the one hand, it has propelled unprecedented innovation in production. Manufacturers responded to growing demand by developing new production and marketing techniques. Mass production, popularised by figures such as Henry Ford, made it possible to produce goods in large quantities at lower cost. In addition, advertising became an essential tool for attracting and persuading consumers to buy products, creating a consumerist culture. Easy access to credit also played a crucial role. Before the 1920s, the idea of buying on credit or going into debt for non-essential purchases was widely stigmatised. However, the decade saw the introduction and popularisation of credit schemes such as instalment payments, which allowed consumers to buy goods even if they didn't have the immediate funds to do so. This method of purchasing stimulated demand and gave a sense of affluence. However, these benefits were mainly felt by the elite and the middle class. The working class, although benefiting from a slight increase in wages, was not able to take advantage of this consumer boom in the same way. Many lived on the margins, barely able to make ends meet. In the end, this frenzied consumption was not sustainable. Once the middle class and the elite had satisfied their immediate needs for durable goods, their ability to continue stimulating the economy by buying new products diminished. In addition, the excessive use of credit by many consumers created economic bubbles, where the perceived value of goods far exceeded their real value.

The decade of the 1920s saw a major transformation in American consumer habits. The ability to buy on credit opened the door to a new era of consumerism. Consumers were no longer limited by their immediate savings to make purchases. Goods once considered luxuries, such as cars or household appliances, became accessible to a larger proportion of the population thanks to instalment payments and other forms of consumer credit. However, this apparent ease of purchase concealed underlying dangers. Increased household indebtedness made the economy more vulnerable to shocks. Many consumers found themselves in debt far beyond their means, gambling on the promise of future wage increases or the simple optimism of a booming economy. Consumer debt became a common problem, and many were unprepared or did not understand the long-term implications of their financial obligations. In addition, banks and financial institutions, seeking to capitalise on this new trend, adopted riskier lending practices, fuelling the economic bubble. The proliferation of stocks bought 'on margin', i.e. with borrowed money, is another example of the credit craze of the period. These practices amplified the effects of the stock market crash when confidence collapsed. When the economy began to show signs of slowing in the late 1920s, the fragile debt structure of consumers and financial institutions exacerbated the situation. The combination of high debt, declining confidence and reduced consumption created the perfect environment for the economic crisis that followed. The Great Depression that began with the stock market crash of 1929 highlighted the dangers of over-reliance on credit and the flaws of an economy based on unsustainable consumption.

The consumer boom of the 1920s, although often celebrated in popular culture as a period of prosperity and glamour, was not shared equally by all Americans. While cities boomed and consumerism flourished, other sectors of society did not benefit equally from this economic boom. Farmers, for example, endured a particularly difficult decade. After the First World War, European demand for American agricultural products plummeted, leading to a fall in prices. Many American farmers found themselves in debt, unable to repay the loans they had taken out during the war years. This situation was exacerbated by unfavourable weather conditions and the mechanisation of agriculture, which increased production but also increased farmers' indebtedness. These factors led to a major agrarian crisis. Industrial workers, despite the rise in mass production, did not always see their wages increase at the same rate as productivity or company profits. Many workers, particularly in fast-growing industries such as the car industry, worked in difficult conditions for relatively low wages, making it difficult for them to access this new era of consumption. Economic inequalities were also accentuated by racial and regional inequalities. African-Americans, particularly those living in the South, were often excluded from many economic opportunities and faced segregation and discrimination. All this created a deeply divided society, with a prosperous elite and growing middle class benefiting from mass consumption and technological advances on the one hand, and marginalised and economically disadvantaged groups on the other. These disparities, although overshadowed by the apparent glamour of the 'Roaring Twenties', would lay the foundations for the socio-economic tensions and challenges of the decades to come.

The credit and hire purchase system, which became increasingly popular during the 1920s, gave many middle-class Americans access to goods they would not otherwise have been able to afford. This allowed consumers to buy goods such as cars, fridges and radios by paying an initial deposit followed by monthly payments. This easy access to credit was one of the main drivers of the consumer boom of the decade. However, this new era of credit was not available to everyone. Many workers and farmers, whose incomes were low or irregular, were not eligible for these forms of credit, or if they were, they found it risky and potentially ruinous if they could not make the payments. In addition, the complexity of credit contracts, with sometimes high interest rates and sometimes misleading terms, could make repayment difficult for those who were not used to or did not have the means to manage such financial arrangements. What's more, even though many products were technically 'affordable' thanks to credit, they remained out of reach for those living in poverty or close to the poverty line. The dream of owning a car, for example, remained out of reach for many, even though Ford's Model T was marketed as a car for the 'average Joe'. This inaccessibility to credit and new consumer goods not only reinforced the economic divide between different socio-economic groups, but also created a cultural divide. While the middle class and the elite lived in a world of novelty, entertainment and modernity, others were left behind, reinforcing the feeling of exclusion and inequality.

The consumer boom of the 1920s, often referred to as the age of consumerism, brought enormous changes to the way Americans lived and spent their money. The proliferation of cars, radios, household appliances and other consumer goods transformed the daily lives of many American families. These innovations, combined with new marketing and advertising methods and easier access to credit, encouraged an unprecedented level of consumption. However, this boom has not benefited everyone equally. While the urban middle class and the elite took full advantage of this era of prosperity, many people in the working and rural classes were left behind. The agricultural economy, for example, struggled throughout the 1920s. Farmers, who had increased production during the First World War in response to European demand, were left with surpluses when demand fell after the war. Prices for agricultural products plummeted, plunging many farmers into debt. While city life modernised at a rapid pace, many rural areas languished in poverty. Similarly, although wages rose in some industrial sectors, they did not always keep pace with inflation or the rising cost of living. Many industrial workers have not been able to reap the full benefits of the consumer boom. The ease of access to credit, while beneficial for those who could obtain and manage it, also trapped some consumers in debts they could not repay, particularly when faced with unforeseen economic or personal circumstances.

The economic dynamics of the 1920s laid the foundations for the Great Crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression. The decade was marked by an explosion in consumer spending, particularly on goods such as cars, radios and household appliances. However, once many families owned these items, demand began to wane. What's more, access to credit had been made easier, allowing consumers to acquire these goods, but putting them into considerable debt. So, as economic confidence began to erode, consumer spending slowed, partly as a result of this high level of debt. In parallel with these trends, there was a growing concentration of wealth in the hands of a small elite, while the majority of people did not have enough discretionary income to support the demand for goods. Towards the end of the decade, rampant stock market speculation emerged, with many investors buying shares on credit, exacerbating the economic fragility. When the market began to decline, the forced sale of shares to cover margins accelerated the crash. After the crash, the situation was exacerbated by certain political and monetary interventions, such as the Federal Reserve's tightening of the money supply and the government's increase in tariffs, which hampered international trade. Finally, consumer and business confidence collapsed, further reducing spending and investment. In addition, it should be noted that economic problems in other parts of the world also influenced the US economy, as the Great Depression was truly a global phenomenon.

The stock market dynamics of the 1920s reflected the deep-rooted inequalities of the American economy. A wealthy elite, having accumulated significant wealth, pumped massive amounts of money into the stock market, betting on continued growth. When the market showed signs of weakness, their exposure was such that they suffered huge losses. Buying shares on margin, i.e. buying shares with borrowed money, was a common and risky practice at the time. It boosted gains in good times, but it also meant that a relatively small fall in the market could wipe out the value of an investment, leaving investors in debt beyond their initial investments. When confidence began to erode and share prices fell, those who had bought on margin found themselves in a desperate situation. Not only did they see the value of their investments evaporate, but they also owed money to their creditors. Panic set in and a rush to sell shares exacerbated the decline, causing a major market collapse. The combination of high concentration of wealth, unbridled speculation and high debt created a perfect recipe for the financial catastrophe of 1929.

The decade of the 1920s, often referred to as the Roaring Twenties, saw a radical transformation of American society. Rapid urbanisation, stimulated by post-First World War prosperity, moved a large proportion of the population from rural areas to the cities. These urban centres became hotbeds of cultural and technological innovations that continue to influence American life today. The automobile, in particular, has redefined the American way of life. The Ford Model T, affordable and mass-produced thanks to assembly line innovations, made mobility accessible to many Americans. This not only revolutionised transport, but also led to the growth of suburbs, as more and more people were able to live outside city centres while working there. Alongside this spatial expansion, skyscrapers symbolised America's aspiration to reach new heights. Cities like New York and Chicago became the scene of a race to build the tallest building, epitomised by icons like the Empire State Building. Department stores, such as Macy's in New York and Marshall Field's in Chicago, offered a new and luxurious shopping experience, transforming shopping into a leisure pursuit rather than a necessity. These temples to consumerism offered a vast range of products under one roof, reflecting the rise of mass consumerism. Entertainment culture also underwent a metamorphosis. Radio became a central means of communication and entertainment, allowing Americans from all walks of life to be connected by news, broadcasts and music. Jazz in particular, with its heady rhythms and daring improvisations, became the signature sound of the era, reflecting the energy and optimism of the 1920s.

The motor car was undoubtedly one of the most transformative innovations of the twentieth century, and its influence was particularly perceptible in the 1920s. Before the advent of the automobile on a large scale, Americans were largely dependent on rail systems and horses to get around. The car changed this radically, reshaping the geographical and cultural landscape of the United States. The emergence of infrastructure such as motorways was a direct response to the increase in the number of cars. These roads facilitated inter-city travel, connecting cities and states as never before. Petrol stations, previously non-existent, became commonplace along these motorways, often evolving into complexes offering not only petrol, but also food and accommodation. The development of new types of business, such as motels and drive-in restaurants, has become emblematic of this new car culture. Illuminated motel signs and diners have become symbols of the American road, attracting travellers with the promise of a comfortable rest or a hot meal. Tourism, once limited by the constraints of train or horse-drawn carriage travel, has boomed. National parks, beaches and other attractions have seen increasing numbers of visitors, creating new economic and recreational opportunities for Americans. But perhaps the most profound impact of the automobile was its role in transforming social norms. For women, in particular, owning and driving a car became a symbol of freedom. They were no longer confined to their immediate locality or dependent on men to get them around. This mobility played a key role in the emancipation of women, enabling them to work, socialise and engage in public life in ways they could not have imagined just a few decades earlier. In this way, the automobile was not just a means of transport, but an agent of change that redefined the everyday American experience, reshaping the nation's physical and cultural landscape.

Skyscrapers on the Manhattan peninsula in New York in 1932.

Advertising, in tandem with mass production, truly revolutionised consumer behaviour and shaped American culture in the 1920s. For the first time, products were mass-produced and aggressively promoted to the general public, creating a consumer culture that had previously been unheard of. Mass culture, made possible by mass production, led to a homogenisation of popular culture. Popular films, radio programmes and magazines were consumed by a wide audience, creating a shared cultural experience. Icons such as Charlie Chaplin, Babe Ruth and Louis Armstrong were known to everyone, whether they lived in New York or a small Midwestern town. Mass entertainment, from movies to Broadway shows to baseball games, became commonplace. Cinemas, in particular, proliferated in American cities, offering citizens affordable entertainment and an escape from everyday reality. Radio, a 1920s innovation, quickly became the medium of choice for broadcasting music, news and entertainment, creating a unified cultural experience. All this was amplified by advertising, which played a key role in creating a culture of desire. Advertising was not just about providing information about a product; it also sold a way of life, an aspiration. Advertisements often presented ideals to be achieved: a more comfortable life, higher social status, better looks or optimal health. The average consumer was bombarded with messages suggesting how to live, what to wear, what to eat and how to entertain themselves. As a result, the decade of the 1920s, often referred to as the Roaring Twenties, saw an explosion of consumer culture. Innovations in production and distribution, combined with increasingly sophisticated advertising techniques, created an environment where the purchase of goods was no longer simply a necessity, but also a form of personal expression and a means of belonging to the dominant culture.

The transformation of American cities during the 1920s reflects the rapid shift from a society centred on production to one centred on consumption. City centres became bustling places, offering an unprecedented range of activities and attractions for city dwellers. The standardised working day, combined with the emergence of the five-day working week for some, also freed up time for leisure and relaxation. Jazz, born in the American South and perfected in cities like New Orleans and Chicago, quickly became the soundtrack of the 1920s. Jazz clubs proliferated, particularly in cities like New York, and became meeting places where racial and social barriers were often broken down, at least temporarily, on the dance floor. The Charleston, the emblematic dance of the era, became a national phenomenon. Cinema, meanwhile, changed the way Americans perceived the world and themselves. The first talking pictures appeared at the end of the decade, ushering in a new era of entertainment. Hollywood stars such as Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks became cultural icons, their films attracting millions of viewers every week. Professional sports, particularly baseball, exploded in popularity. Stadiums were built across the country to accommodate ever-growing crowds. Sports heroes, like Babe Ruth, were revered and followed passionately by their devoted fans. Department stores, such as Macy's in New York or Marshall Field's in Chicago, became meeting places in themselves. These temples to consumerism offered much more than merchandise: they offered an experience. The restaurants, tea rooms and cinemas that were often integrated into these shops made the shopping day a complete outing. At the heart of all these changes was a common ideology: consumerism. The apparent prosperity of the 1920s, bolstered by easy credit, encouraged people to buy. And as the decade progressed, this consumer culture became increasingly inseparable from the American identity itself, laying the foundations for the modern consumer society we know today.

Radio transformed the way Americans consumed news and entertainment, allowing them to access content in real time, right in their homes. Previously, people had to rely on newspapers, magazines or cinemas for information or entertainment. With radio, all that has changed. Daily radio broadcasts quickly became an integral part of everyday American life. Families gathered around the radio to listen to stories, news, games and music. Famous shows such as "Amos 'n' Andy" and "The Lone Ranger" captivated audiences and became an integral part of American popular culture. Radio has also had a major impact on music. Before radio, music had to be played live to be heard, whether in concert halls, clubs or private parties. With radio, artists from all over the country could be heard by a national audience. This helped propel new musical genres, such as jazz, blues and country, onto the national stage. Advertising also played an essential role in funding commercial radio. Advertisements were integrated into programmes, and many programmes were even sponsored by companies, giving rise to famous phrases such as "Brought to you by...". This commercial model not only financed the rapid development of radio, but also helped shape the American media landscape for decades to come.

Advertising played a transformational role in the radio landscape of the 1920s. Not only did it fund the content that was broadcast, but it also helped define the structure and format of programming. The most popular time slots were often reserved for programmes sponsored by major companies, and advertising messages were carefully integrated to capture listeners' attention. Companies were quick to recognise the potential of radio to reach a wide audience in a personal and direct way. Unlike print ads, radio offered an auditory dimension, allowing brands to create an emotional connection with listeners through catchy jingles, humorous sketches and compelling testimonials. In addition, the advertising-led business model kept the cost of radio receivers relatively low for consumers. By making radio affordable, more American households were able to own one, increasing the potential audience for advertisers. It was a virtuous circle: the more listeners there were, the more advertisers were willing to invest in radio advertising, which in turn financed better and more diverse content. However, this model also had its critics. Some felt that the reliance on advertising compromised the integrity of the programmes, leading them to focus on content that would attract advertisers rather than offering quality educational or cultural programming. Despite these concerns, it was undeniable that advertising had become the cornerstone of commercial radio, shaping its development and impact on American society.

Radio quickly became one of the main vehicles for the burgeoning consumer culture of the 1920s. With its ability to reach millions of listeners almost instantly, it represented an unprecedented advertising tool for businesses. Radio adverts were often carefully crafted not only to inform listeners about products, but also to evoke a desire or need for those products. For example, an advert for a fridge not only spoke of its ability to cool food, but also evoked modernity, comfort and progress, themes that resonated with the audience of the time. Soap operas, often nicknamed "soap operas" because they were frequently sponsored by soap companies, played a particular role in this consumer culture. These daily programmes, which recounted the tumultuous lives of their characters, were extremely popular, particularly among housewives. Brands knew that if they could subtly integrate their products into these stories, or even simply advertise them during breaks, they would reach a large, captive audience. Cooking shows were another effective medium. By presenting new recipes and techniques, they not only stimulated sales of specific ingredients, but also promoted modern household appliances such as blenders and electric ovens.

Radio profoundly transformed the way Americans interacted with sports. Previously, if someone wanted to follow a sporting event, they either had to attend in person or wait for the report in the next day's paper. With the advent of radio, sporting events were transmitted directly into people's living rooms, creating a collective experience where neighbours gathered to listen to a match or competition. Radio not only made sport more accessible, it also changed the way sport was perceived and presented to the public. Radio sports commentators had to develop a new way of telling the action, describing every move in detail so that listeners could visualise the event in their minds. This lively, energetic commentary added a new dimension to the sporting experience, making each match even more exciting. Athletes have also become national celebrities thanks to radio. Players like Babe Ruth in baseball or Jack Dempsey in boxing have become legendary figures, largely thanks to the media coverage they received. Radio enabled their exploits to be known far beyond the cities in which they played. Finally, radio has also played a key role in the evolution of professional sports as a lucrative industry. With a national listening audience, advertisers were keen to place their ads during sports broadcasts, generating significant revenue for leagues and teams. In short, radio not only changed the way the public consumed sport, it also changed the economic infrastructure of professional sport in the United States.

For much of the 20th century, racial segregation was deeply entrenched in many aspects of American society, and sports were no exception. Despite the undeniable talent of many African-American athletes, they were often denied the opportunity to compete at the highest levels simply because of the colour of their skin. In baseball, for example, segregation gave rise to the Negro Leagues, where black players played among themselves in the absence of opportunities in the major leagues. These leagues were incredibly competitive and produced some of the greatest talents in baseball history, such as Satchel Paige and Josh Gibson. Unfortunately, due to segregation, these players did not have the opportunity to showcase their skills on the biggest stage until Jackie Robinson broke the colour barrier in 1947. Boxing was another area where segregation and racism were evident. Although some African-American boxers were able to reach the top of their sport, they often faced discrimination and prejudice at every stage of their careers. Sporting segregation was just one reflection of the widespread segregation that existed in almost every aspect of American society, from schools and housing to public places and jobs. These injustices helped fuel the civil rights movements that sought to end racial discrimination and ensure equality for all, regardless of complexion. So while the 1920s saw an explosion in the popularity of sport in the United States, it also witnessed the deep racial divisions that continued to separate the country.

In the 1920s, Hollywood quickly became synonymous with the cinema. Technological innovations, a concentration of talent and California's favourable climate fuelled the industry's rapid growth. With the development of silent films, followed by 'talkies' in the late 1920s, cinema became an integral part of American and world culture. These films were often designed to entertain, offering an escape from the often harsh realities of everyday life. Movie theatres, or cinemas, became popular gathering places for Americans from all walks of life. However, the content of some films was often perceived as conflicting with traditional moral standards. Depictions of sex, alcohol consumption (especially during Prohibition) and an opulent, decadent lifestyle raised concerns in many circles. Stars such as Clara Bow, nicknamed 'The It Girl', embodied the new type of liberated woman of the 1920s, often viewed with suspicion by the more conservative. In response to these concerns, and to avoid stricter government regulation, the film industry adopted the Hays Code in 1930 (although it was not fully enforced until 1934). This production code set guidelines on what was and wasn't acceptable in films, eliminating or limiting the depiction of sexuality, crime and other subjects deemed immoral. It is also essential to note that, although Hollywood produced a mass culture, the industry was far from inclusive. As in sport, segregation and racial stereotyping were commonplace in Hollywood. Black actors and actresses were often limited to subservient or stereotypical roles, and were rarely presented as protagonists or heroes.

The advent of Hollywood as a major film production centre had a profound impact on American and global culture. The implementation of the Hays Code may have introduced stricter censorship, but it did not curb the public's appetite for films. In fact, cinemas proliferated throughout the United States, transforming the way people spent their leisure time and conceived of entertainment. The influence of cinema was not limited to mere entertainment. Hollywood films often served as showcases for fashion trends, aesthetic standards, musical styles and even societal ideals. Actors and actresses have become icons, shaping the aspirations and behaviour of millions of people. Films have also introduced and popularised many products, from cigarettes to cars, creating a synergy between the film industry and other commercial sectors. Cinema has also had a democratising impact. Whereas other forms of entertainment, such as theatre or opera, were sometimes seen as being reserved for an elite, cinema was accessible to almost everyone, regardless of social background, level of education or income. For the price of a ticket, cinema-goers could escape their everyday lives and immerse themselves in exotic worlds, passionate love stories or thrilling adventures. In this way, the rise of Hollywood in the 1920s not only redefined cultural norms and consumption patterns, but also laid the foundations for mass culture as we know it today, where entertainment and consumption are closely linked.

Political and social changes, including women's right to vote[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The ratification of the 19th Amendment was a major step forward for women's rights, but its impact was uneven. To understand this dynamic, it is essential to consider the historical and socio-political context of the period. After the end of the Civil War in 1865, the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the US Constitution were adopted, banning slavery and guaranteeing civil rights and the right to vote to black men. However, in the decades that followed, many Southern states introduced 'black codes' and other laws, such as Jim Crow laws, to circumvent these amendments and restrict the rights of African Americans. These restrictions included literacy tests, poll taxes and 'grandfather clauses', designed to prevent blacks from voting while allowing poor whites to avoid these barriers. When the 19th Amendment was ratified in 1920, guaranteeing women the right to vote, these institutional and legal barriers also affected black women. While white women benefited from the new right to vote, many black women were still prevented from voting, particularly in the South. It is also important to note that the women's suffrage movement was not free of racism. Some white suffragettes, seeking to win the support of white men in the South, marginalised or excluded black women from the movement, arguing that white women's right to vote would be beneficial in maintaining "white supremacy". Figures such as Ida B. Wells, an African-American civil rights activist, fought against these racist tendencies within the suffragist movement.

The ratification of the 19th amendment marked a major step in the history of women's rights, but the legislative change did not immediately translate into complete equality in all areas of society. Formal recognition of women's right to vote did not guarantee the elimination of traditional attitudes or patriarchal social structures that had prevailed for centuries. At the beginning of the twentieth century, the dominant perception of "femininity" was strongly rooted in traditional social roles. Women were largely seen as beings naturally destined for the roles of mother, wife and caretaker of the family home. These stereotypes were reinforced by social norms, educational institutions and even the popular literature of the day. Although women's suffrage opened the door to greater participation by women in civic life, cultural and structural obstacles to broader equality persisted. Most women did not have access to higher education equivalent to that of men, and professional opportunities were limited. The professions traditionally open to women were often those seen as extensions of their family roles, such as teaching or nursing. What's more, even when women tried to venture into traditionally male fields, they often came up against systemic barriers. For example, in the legal or medical professions, women could be refused entry to professional schools or excluded from mainstream professional organisations. Despite these barriers, the 1920s saw the emergence of new images of women, notably the figure of the "flapper" - daring young women who defied conventional norms of behaviour and fashion. However, even these images were often tinged with ambivalence, as they were both celebrated and criticised for their departures from the traditional norm. Over time, legislative advances combined with progressive social movements have helped to undermine patriarchal structures and expand opportunities for women. Nevertheless, the gap between formal rights and women's everyday reality has underlined that legislative change, while crucial, is only part of the journey towards true gender equality.

The ratification of the 19th amendment in 1920 was a major step, but the fight for gender equality was far from over. During the 1960s and 1970s, the second wave of feminism emerged, focusing on issues such as reproductive rights, equal employment, education and other civil rights for women. Iconic figures such as Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem and Bella Abzug played a major role in leading this movement. Friedan's book The Feminine Mystique, published in 1963, is often credited with initiating this new wave of feminist activism. This period also saw the birth of groups such as the National Organization for Women (NOW) in 1966, which aimed to get women to participate fully in society, whether in the workplace, education or politics. Despite significant advances, this period was also marked by controversy and tension, particularly around issues such as abortion, sexuality and gender roles. The attempt to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) in the 1970s was a particularly notable example of these tensions, as although the amendment was supported by many feminists, it ultimately failed in the face of organised opposition. Nevertheless, the second wave of feminism laid the foundations for many subsequent advances. It raised public awareness of many women's rights issues and helped create an infrastructure of women's rights organisations and advocates who continue to advocate for gender equality to this day. Throughout the following decades, and with the emergence of third and fourth waves of feminism, women's rights and roles continued to evolve, addressing issues such as intersectionality, gender identity and LGBTQ+ rights. While much remains to be done to achieve true equality, feminist movements have undeniably shaped and influenced the evolution of America's political and social landscape.

Others, however, focused on cultural and societal issues, seeking to challenge and transform gender norms and social expectations of women. They believed that true liberation would come not just from changing laws, but also from transforming mentalities and attitudes towards women and gender roles. For these feminists, it was crucial to tackle the misogyny, sexism and patriarchy embedded in culture and society, as these perpetuated the oppression of women. In addition, there were divisions based on factors such as race, class and sexual orientation. For example, some black feminists felt that the white-dominated feminist movement did not address the specific concerns of black women, which were at the intersection of racism and sexism. Organisations such as the National Black Feminist Organization were formed to address these unique concerns. There were also debates about how best to achieve change. Some feminists favoured a more radical approach, seeking to overthrow existing patriarchal structures, while others took a more reformist approach, working within the system to achieve incremental change. Despite these divisions, these different facets of the movement have all contributed in one way or another to the advancement of women's rights. Feminists who worked on political and legal issues achieved concrete changes in policies and laws, while those who focused on cultural issues helped transform attitudes and perceptions about women and gender roles.

The sexual liberation movement of the 1960s and 1970s, for example, was profoundly influenced by these feminist ideas. Women began to demand their right to contraception, abortion and full autonomy over their reproductive decisions. The notion of "my body, my choice" became a central slogan of this period. The questioning of societal norms also led to a deeper exploration of what it meant to be a woman. Feminists criticised the way in which women were portrayed in the media and popular culture, often reducing them to stereotypes or sexualising them. As a result, they put forward ideas about personal emancipation, self-acceptance and breaking with traditional norms. In addition, the feminist movement of this period saw the emergence of consciousness groups where women came together to discuss their personal experiences and share their stories. These groups offered women a space to express themselves, connect with others and become aware of systemic issues that affected all women. The movement also embraced issues of sexual orientation. As the gay liberation movement gained momentum, many feminists supported the right of women to define their own sexual orientation and to oppose heteronormativity. These efforts to challenge and redefine societal norms were not without resistance. Many segments of society have seen these changes as threatening to the established social order. However, despite the challenges, these feminists laid the foundations for a more inclusive and diverse movement, promoting the ideas of choice, acceptance and personal freedom.

The division within the feminist movement following the ratification of the 19th Amendment is symptomatic of the diversity of women's concerns and experiences in the United States. Once universal suffrage had been achieved, the question of what the next step should be elicited a variety of responses. In the 1920s and 1930s, some feminists focused on issues of economic equality, arguing for equal pay laws and labour rights for women. Others took up pacifist causes, while still others addressed issues of sexuality and reproduction. However, during this period, the feminist movement was largely dominated by white middle-class women, and the concerns of women of colour, working-class women and other marginalised groups were often ignored or relegated to the background. The 'second wave' of feminism in the 1960s and 1970s represented a revitalisation of the movement. It was influenced by other social movements of the time, such as the civil rights movement, the anti-war movement and the gay liberation movement. This period saw a renewed focus on issues such as reproductive rights, violence against women and equality in the workplace. In addition, the second wave was characterised by an increased awareness of diversity and intersectionality within the movement. Feminists such as Audre Lorde, bell hooks and Gloria Anzaldúa have emphasised the importance of taking into account the experiences of women of colour, LGBTQ+ women and women from different socio-economic backgrounds. Nevertheless, despite these advances, tensions persisted within the movement, with debates over priorities, tactics and philosophies. These dynamics have continued to evolve and transform over time, and feminism as a movement remains a space for debate, innovation and change.

The move towards women's emancipation in the 1920s was influenced by a convergence of factors. After the First World War, there was a general decline in birth rates. This reduction meant fewer physical constraints and responsibilities for women, giving them the opportunity to pursue careers and engage in activities outside the family home. At the same time, the introduction of new domestic technologies has played a crucial role. Household appliances such as fridges, washing machines and hoovers have simplified and speeded up household chores. As a result, women were able to save time, giving them more freedom for other activities. This period also saw more women access secondary and higher education, increasing their intellectual autonomy and broadening their professional horizons. The impact of the First World War on the labour market cannot be underestimated. With so many men away at the front, women had to fill the professional void. Although many were forced to return to domestic life after the war, the experience showed that they could take on jobs previously reserved for men, even if they were often paid less. The cultural and social changes were also palpable in fashion. Women's dress became less restrictive, with the adoption of shorter dresses and the abandonment of corsets. These clothing choices, while superficial on the surface, reflected a profound desire for freedom and autonomy. What's more, with greater access to contraception, women began to exercise greater control over their bodies and their fertility. Finally, the arts, such as literature and film, played a major role in portraying women as independent and autonomous beings. The figures of the "flappers", the daring young women of the 1920s, have become emblematic, embodying freedom, joie de vivre and the questioning of established norms. However, it should be stressed that despite these significant advances, many inequalities and discriminations against women persisted.

The decline in birth rates observed during this period had profound implications for the role and place of women in society. Fewer children to raise meant less investment of time and resources in parenting. This opened up a window of opportunity for many women, allowing them to explore avenues they had not previously considered. In particular, middle-class women have been the main beneficiaries of this demographic transition. Often with access to better education and more information about birth control methods, they have been able to make informed choices about family planning. Financial resources have also enabled them to access resources such as birth control or even to hire help with household chores, freeing up more of their time. This extra free time has often been invested in education, work, leisure, or participation in social and political movements. These developments played a decisive role in redefining the role of women and challenging the social and cultural norms of the time.

The introduction of new domestic technologies at the beginning of the 20th century marked a revolution in the daily lives of many women. Household chores, which had previously been time-consuming and laborious, were simplified and automated thanks to inventions such as the washing machine, hoover and refrigerator. These innovations, which may seem commonplace today, were in fact symbols of progress and modernity in the 1920s. With less time devoted to chores, women were able to become more involved in activities outside the home. This paved the way for greater participation by women in professional, educational and social life. They were able, for example, to return to school, join the labour market, or get involved in social movements and leisure activities. This transition not only contributed to the emancipation of women, but also challenged and redefined the traditional roles associated with femininity. The home was no longer the only domain of expression and fulfilment for women, and society gradually began to recognise and value their contribution in other areas of public life.

During the 1920s, a series of converging factors, such as declining birth rates and the advent of domestic technologies, facilitated changes in the status of women in society. These developments gradually changed the perception of women's roles, giving them more time and flexibility to pursue aspirations outside the traditional domestic framework. However, although this progress was significant, it was not necessarily accompanied by a complete overhaul of societal attitudes or legislative frameworks. Institutional and cultural barriers remained significant. Women continued to face systemic discrimination, whether in the labour market, in access to education or in the exercise of their civil rights. It is undeniable that the 1920s laid the foundations for a major transformation in the place of women in society. However, it was not until several decades later, particularly with the emergence of the feminist movements of the 1960s and 1970s, that these cultural changes were translated into significant legislative reforms, guaranteeing women more concrete and extensive equal rights.

The fall in the birth rate during the 1920s had a significant impact on family structure and education. Families with fewer children could devote more resources to each of them. As a result, the value of education increased. Secondary school, once seen as a luxury for many, has become a common stage in the educational journey. In addition, access to higher education has widened. This trend towards a longer period of education has had the effect of extending the time spent by young adults at home. As a result, the age at which young people enter the labour market has shifted, and with it other key stages of life, such as marriage or starting a family. As a result, the transition from childhood to adulthood was extended, leading to a reconfiguration of societal norms regarding the passage to adulthood.

The socio-economic transition of the 1920s played a major role in this delayed entry to the labour market. As the American economy developed, it moved increasingly towards a model based on services and office occupations. This pivot required a more educated and skilled workforce, capable of meeting the demands of the emerging white-collar jobs. Education thus became not only a means of personal fulfilment, but also an economic imperative. Young people were encouraged to pursue higher education to acquire specialist skills and gain access to these more lucrative and stable jobs. Universities and vocational schools grew in importance, preparing students for careers in fields such as law, medicine, business and engineering. This phenomenon has also had an impact on socio-economic dynamics. The value placed on education reinforced the separation between manual workers and those in intellectual professions. This distinction gradually widened the socio-economic gap, with education becoming a key indicator of social status and economic mobility.

By spending more time at school and delaying their entry into the labour market, young people were able to experience an extended phase of personal and academic exploration. This period, often associated with adolescence and early adulthood, has become an essential stage for forging an identity, developing critical thinking and acquiring in-depth knowledge in specific fields. It has also fostered the emergence of a distinct youth culture. By spending more time with each other, whether at school, university or in other social contexts, young people have formed communities and created subcultures that have had a significant influence on music, fashion, art and other aspects of popular culture. In economic terms, the decision to pursue further education has generally led to positive returns on investment for individuals. With higher levels of education, these young adults were able to compete for better-paid jobs and more advanced career opportunities. In the long term, this contributed to overall economic growth, as a better-educated workforce is generally more productive and innovative. Finally, this development also had implications for families and intergenerational relations. As young people lived longer with their parents or depended on them financially while they studied, this changed family dynamics, often strengthening ties while creating new challenges and tensions.

Artistic and cultural movements[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The 1920s in the United States, often referred to as the 'Roaring Twenties', was a period of cultural and social effervescence marked by a profound spirit of experimentation and rebellion against traditional norms. Following the First World War, the country was experiencing an economic boom. This dynamic, combined with technological innovation and demographic change, catalysed a cultural transformation. Jazz, led by icons such as Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington, came to the fore, symbolising the freedom and innovation of the era. Literature also reflected this spirit, with authors such as F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway exploring themes of freedom, rebellion and disillusionment. At the same time, fashion saw women adopting shorter dresses and bold hairstyles, embodying a new era of female independence. The era was also marked by alcohol prohibition, which, despite its moralistic intentions, often spawned more vices, particularly with the rise of speakeasies and organised crime. At the same time, Hollywood became the nerve centre of world cinema, with silent films giving way to talkies and actors like Charlie Chaplin becoming iconic figures. However, this decade was not without its tensions. The Harlem Renaissance highlighted the cultural contributions of African Americans, but the country was still deeply segregated. In addition, nativist movements led to drastic restrictions on immigration. Taken together, these factors made the 1920s a period rich in contradictions, combining cultural exuberance and societal tensions.

In literary terms, the 1920s were characterised by the rise of a generation of innovative writers who were deeply immersed in the turbulence of their time. These writers, often referred to as the "lost generation", captured the essence of the post-war era, a time when old ideals seemed to have collapsed in the face of the brutal reality of the trenches and battlefields. Ernest Hemingway, with his spare style and direct prose, portrayed the psychological trauma of war and the search for authenticity in works such as "The Sun Also Rises". F. Scott Fitzgerald captured the opulence and superficiality of the 1920s, while highlighting the futility of American dreams in works such as "Gatsby the Magnificent". T.S. Eliot, though more abstract, explored cultural fragmentation and the loss of moral cohesion in poems like "The Waste Land". These and other writers not only depicted an era, but also questioned the very foundations of society, offering often bleak but deeply reflective visions of the modern world.

During the 1920s, the art world underwent a radical transformation, moving away from traditional conventions to embrace avant-garde ideas and techniques. Modernism became the dominant trend, encouraging artists to break with the past and adopt innovative approaches to express their vision of the contemporary world. Among the stylistic movements that emerged, Art Deco stands out for its fusion of innovation and aesthetics. With its clean lines, geometric patterns and bold colour palette, Art Deco manifested itself in everything from architecture to the decorative arts, reflecting the optimism and dynamism of the era. At the same time, the American musical landscape was abuzz with the rise of jazz, a genre that embodied the freedom, spontaneity and rhythm of urban life. Cities like New Orleans and Chicago became centres of jazz innovation, but it was in New York, specifically in the Harlem district, that the Harlem Renaissance took root. This cultural and artistic movement celebrated African-American identity, expression and creativity, giving rise to a plethora of literary, musical and artistic masterpieces that have had a lasting influence on American culture.

The 1920s was a decisive era for the film industry. It was a time when Hollywood consolidated its position as the film capital of the world, attracting directors, screenwriters and actors from all over the world, eager to become part of this burgeoning dream machine. But one of the most striking innovations of the decade was the introduction of sound into films. With the release of "The Jazz Singer" in 1927, silent films, which had dominated the screen until then, began to give way to talking pictures. This transition was not without its problems, as many actors from the silent era found it difficult to adapt to this new dimension of sound, and some even saw their careers decline because of their voice or accent. Alongside this technological revolution, the industry also saw the emergence of the "star system". Studios realised that audiences were attracted not only by the stories themselves, but also by the actors who played them. Stars like Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford and Rudolph Valentino became icons, and their lives both on and off the screen were fervently followed by millions of fans. The studios capitalised on this fascination by meticulously controlling the public image of their stars, creating a glamour industry that is still alive today. In this way, the 1920s not only redefined the way films were produced and consumed, but also laid the foundations for modern celebrity culture.

The 1920s, often referred to as the 'Roaring Twenties', were a pivotal decade in the cultural and artistic history of the twentieth century. This post-First World War period was marked by a profound desire for renewal, a thirst for experimentation and a rejection of past conventions. In literature, writers such as Ernest Hemingway and F. Scott Fitzgerald captured the essence of this period, expressing both the exuberance of youth and a certain disillusionment with the unfulfilled promises of modernity. Their works, deeply rooted in the realities and contradictions of their time, continue to influence writers and readers today. In terms of art, Modernism and Art Deco revolutionised the way people thought about art, with simplified forms, geometric patterns and a celebration of modernity. Artists such as Georgia O'Keeffe and Edward Hopper brought a unique perspective to the American experience, combining modernity with nostalgia. Music was also transformed during this period, with the emergence of jazz, a genre deeply rooted in the African-American experience, influencing many forms of artistic expression, from film to dance. The Harlem Renaissance, meanwhile, highlighted the immense talent and creativity of African-Americans, redefining American culture as a whole. Hollywood, with its rise and innovations in talking pictures, redefined entertainment and laid the foundations for the film industry as we know it today. The 1920s was a period of cultural ferment, when artists, writers and musicians, influenced by the rapid transformations of their time, pushed back the boundaries of artistic expression, leaving a lasting legacy that continues to shape art and culture today.

Literary flowering[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

In the literary panorama, the 1920s offer a rich and nuanced picture of socio-cultural change in the United States. The rapid growth of cities, the rise of technology and the transformation of urban landscapes were both a source of excitement and disenchantment for many intellectuals and writers. This rapid urbanisation gave rise to feelings of alienation and isolation, not least because the industrial revolution overturned traditional ways of life. Writers of the "lost generation", a term popularised by Gertrude Stein, felt this tension between the old world and the new. They witnessed the First World War, a war that challenged many of their previous beliefs and often left them disillusioned. The war, with its horrors and chaos, shattered many illusions about human progress, and writers of this generation sought to make sense of this new reality. Writers like F. Scott Fitzgerald, in "Gatsby the Magnificent", painted seductive but ultimately empty pictures of the prosperity of the 1920s, showing the disenchantment that can result from the unbridled pursuit of the American dream. Ernest Hemingway, in works such as "The Sun Also Rises", explored the disillusionment of war veterans searching for purpose in a world that seems to have lost its own. Alienation, resulting from the dizzying speed of change and the sense that modernity is eroding old certainties, is a common theme. Disillusionment and alienation were reflections of this period of intense change, when the old world and the new realities often seemed at odds.

The 1920s was a pivotal period for American literature, when a constellation of writers emerged who reflected the tumult and transformation of their times. The advent of the "lost generation" marked a turning point in the way the world was perceived and interpreted. This expression, attributed to Gertrude Stein, refers to a cohort of writers who lived through the First World War and were profoundly affected by its trauma and by the societal changes that followed. Ernest Hemingway, with his spare and direct prose, captured the essence of this disillusionment in works such as "The Sun Also Rises", depicting a generation of young people searching for meaning in a post-war world that seemed devoid of it. His characters, often haunted by their wartime experiences, reflect a society struggling to recover from the scars left by the conflict. F. Scott Fitzgerald, for his part, plunged into the heart of the Roaring Twenties, revealing the effervescence but also the emptiness of that era. In "Gatsby the Magnificent", he explores the frantic quest for the American dream, with all its promises and disappointments. The lavish parties and aspirations of the characters mask a deep melancholy and sense of failure. T.S. Eliot, although British by adoption, also influenced this period with his poetic exploration of modern disenchantment. "The Waste Land" is perhaps the most poignant reflection of this period, a poem that paints a fragmented, desolate world in search of spirituality. These authors, among others, shaped a literature that not only reflected their times, but also continues to influence our understanding of the modern world. They exposed the cracks in the veneer of contemporary society, asking fundamental questions about the meaning, value and nature of human existence in an ever-changing world.

The 1920s, often referred to as the 'Roaring Twenties', was a period of major social and cultural upheaval in the United States. It was a time when boundaries expanded, popular culture took off and traditional notions were challenged. The literature of this decade was bound to reflect these tumultuous movements. One of the most striking changes of this period was mass immigration. Many writers, such as Anzia Yezierska in her novel "Bread Givers", captured the struggles of immigrants faced with the duality between preserving their cultural heritage and assimilating into American society. The challenges, tensions and aspirations of these newcomers have become central themes in the works of many authors. The rapid rise of urban areas and the relative decline of rural areas also influenced the literature of the period. Cities, with their boundless energy, diversity and modernity, became backdrops for stories of ambition, disillusionment and the search for identity. Sinclair Lewis, in "Babbitt", for example, criticised the hypocrisy and conformism of the small-town middle class. In terms of the changing role of women, the literature of the 1920s captured both their struggles for equality and their desire for independence. After gaining the right to vote in 1920, women made their way into the world of work, cultural life and public life. Authors such as Zelda Fitzgerald and Edith Wharton explored the tensions between traditional expectations and the new freedoms women were beginning to embrace. These themes, among others, showed that writers of the 1920s were deeply engaged with the society of their time. They responded to the challenges of their generation with a creativity and insight that continue to illuminate our understanding of this rich and complex period.

The economic boom of the 1920s in the United States, with its emphasis on consumerism and technological progress, offered vast opportunities but also created a society increasingly focused on materialism. Skyscrapers sprang up in major cities, the stock market rose to dizzying heights, and the car became a symbol of freedom and success. However, this prosperity often concealed an underlying emptiness, which many writers of the time were quick to point out.

The novel most emblematic of this perspective is probably "Gatsby the Magnificent" by F. Scott Fitzgerald. Through the tragic story of Jay Gatsby, Fitzgerald describes a world where apparent success and glamour conceal superficiality, disillusionment and despair. Gatsby, for all his wealth, is fundamentally a lonely man, pursuing an idealised and unattainable vision of happiness. Ernest Hemingway, in "The Sun Also Rises", also explored the feeling of disillusionment. The novel, centred on a group of American expatriates in Paris, illustrates a generation scarred by the trauma of the First World War, unable to find meaning or satisfaction in post-war society. Sinclair Lewis, for his part, criticised the hypocrisy and conformism of American society. In "Babbitt", Lewis presents a successful but dissatisfied businessman trapped in a life of social conformity and materialism. Similarly, T.S. Eliot, though English, captured the essence of this disillusionment in his poem, "The Waste Land", which depicts a post-war world devoid of meaning and spirituality. So, although the 1920s were a time of prosperity and innovation, they were also marked by a profound questioning of society's true values. Many iconic writers of the period used their art to probe and critique the often conflicted heart of the American experience.

Ernest Hemingway, with his succinct prose and unique style, became one of the most influential voices of his generation. His time in Europe had a profound effect on him. Living in Paris in the 1920s, he rubbed shoulders with other American expatriates and emblematic figures of literary modernism such as Gertrude Stein, F. Scott Fitzgerald and James Joyce. This immersion in the artistic ferment of Paris enabled him to rub shoulders with the cutting edge of contemporary literature and hone his own writing voice. "The Sun Also Rises", first published in 1926, is a perfect example. Set between Paris and Spain, the novel captures the essence of the "lost generation", a term popularised by Gertrude Stein and echoed by Hemingway himself in the book's epigraph. The characters, like Jake Barnes, carry with them the physical and emotional scars of war, and seek meaning and solace in a world that seems to have lost its bearings. "A Farewell to Arms, written a little later in 1929, is also a reflection on war, but in a more direct and personal way. Based in part on Hemingway's own experiences as an ambulance driver in Italy during the First World War, the novel tells the tragic love story of Frederic Henry, an American ambulance driver, and Catherine Barkley, an English nurse. Throughout the book, Hemingway explores the themes of love, war, death and the absurdity of existence. These works demonstrate Hemingway's ability to convey great emotion with an economy of words. His pared-down, direct style, characterised by short sentences and sharp dialogue, was seen as a reaction against the more florid and ornate prose of his predecessors. But technique aside, his novels offer a profound and sometimes heartbreaking insight into the human condition in a world dislocated by war and change.

F. Scott Fitzgerald is often regarded as the chronicler par excellence of the Jazz Age and the 1920s in America. His writings capture the effervescence and exuberance, but also the fragility and futility, of that era. His lyrical and poetic prose accurately depicts a society obsessed with wealth, celebrity and spectacle, while highlighting the superficiality and emptiness that often lurk behind these glittering facades. In "The Great Gatsby", published in 1925, Fitzgerald describes the rise and tragic fall of Jay Gatsby, a mysterious millionaire who throws lavish parties in the hope of winning back the love of his life, Daisy Buchanan. Through Gatsby's story, Fitzgerald explores the idea of the American Dream - the belief that anyone, regardless of background, can achieve success and happiness through perseverance and hard work. However, the novel suggests that this dream is ultimately unattainable, an elusive illusion that leads to disappointment and destruction. "Tender is the Night", first published in 1934, is another exploration of disillusionment and decadence. The novel tells the story of Dick Diver, a talented psychiatrist, and his wife Nicole, a patient he has cured and married. The couple move in the social circles of the European elite, but behind the glamour and luxuriance lies a darker reality of betrayal, mental instability and moral disintegration. Fitzgerald was fascinated by the contradictions of American society - by the tension between its lofty ideals and the often sordid reality of everyday life. He had a particular talent for depicting the fragility of dreams and the transience of glory. In his writings, beauty and sadness coexist, reflecting the complexity and ambivalence of the human experience.

F. Scott Fitzgerald is indisputably one of the writers who has had the greatest impact on American literature through his insightful portrayal of his time. His work reflects an acerbic critique of the unbridled materialism that characterised America in the 1920s, a post-First World War period marked by an unprecedented economic boom, but also by cultural and spiritual emptiness. Fitzgerald focused on the shiny, attractive façade of the American dream, only to reveal its cracks, voids and shadows. His penetrating look at the wealthy social classes reveals a world of extravagant parties and decadence, where the frantic pursuit of fleeting pleasures often conceals a deep sense of despair and disenchantment. He depicts a gilded elite who, despite their privilege and wealth, are trapped in a relentless quest for status and recognition, often to the detriment of genuine human relationships and a sense of morality. His most emblematic novel, The Great Gatsby, embodies this critique. Jay Gatsby, the protagonist, with all his wealth, charm and ambition, is ultimately a profoundly lonely man, obsessed with an idealised past and unable to find true meaning in the present. The novel shows that, despite material prosperity, a spiritual and emotional void can remain. The themes of rise and fall, moral decay and disillusionment are omnipresent in Fitzgerald's work. His ability to capture the complexity and contradictions of the American experience, particularly during the 1920s, made him an essential chronicler of his time, whose observations remain relevant to this day.

The Harlem Renaissance was undoubtedly one of the most influential cultural movements of the twentieth century. It was a crucible for African-American creativity and expression, forging a legacy that endures to this day. Although geographically located in Harlem, a district in the north of Manhattan, this Renaissance went far beyond the boundaries of this district. Above all, it was an explosion of black culture that demonstrated to America and the world the depth, complexity and variety of African-American experience and expression. Through their works, the protagonists of this Renaissance offered a powerful response to the persistent racial stereotypes and injustices of the time. Literary figures such as Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston and Claude McKay used poetry, fiction and essay to explore the lives, aspirations and frustrations of African Americans. Their works examined both the joy and pain of black life in America and the corrosive effects of racism and segregation. Musically, the Harlem Renaissance saw jazz and blues flourish, with artists like Duke Ellington and Bessie Smith captivating audiences across the country. These musical genres not only provided a soundtrack for this dynamic period, but also influenced many generations of musicians in a variety of genres. The visual arts also flourished. Artists such as Aaron Douglas and Jacob Lawrence created powerful works that celebrated black culture while commenting on the social and political realities of their time. Finally, the Harlem Renaissance was also a time of profound intellectual activism. Figures such as W.E.B. Du Bois and Marcus Garvey advocated civil rights, education and greater autonomy for black communities. This period, rich in artistic innovation and political challenge, left an indelible mark on American culture. It shaped black American identity and changed the way America sees (and hears) its black citizens.

Harlem Renaissance[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The Harlem Renaissance not only marked a moment of cultural effervescence, it also served as a platform for African-Americans to claim their place in the American socio-political landscape. Indeed, this movement was not limited to artistic creation: it also extended into the political and social sphere, becoming a period of reflection on race, class and civil rights. Literarily, iconic figures such as Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston, Claude McKay and James Weldon Johnson used their pens to explore and express the complexities of black life in America. Their works addressed themes such as pride, alienation, the desire for equality and the beauty of black culture. Musically, the Harlem Renaissance was a pivotal period for jazz, with artists such as Duke Ellington, Louis Armstrong and Bessie Smith bringing this Southern American musical genre to the New York urban scene. In addition, blues, gospel and other forms of music also found a platform and a wider audience during this period. Visually, artists such as Aaron Douglas, Augusta Savage and Romare Bearden captured the essence of the movement through painting, sculpture and other visual art forms, using African-American motifs and themes to tell stories of struggle, triumph and beauty. Finally, the Harlem Renaissance was not only a cultural renaissance, but also an intellectual one. Leaders and thinkers like W.E.B. Du Bois, Alain Locke and Marcus Garvey encouraged debates about race, equality and the place of African-Americans.

The Harlem Renaissance was born at a pivotal moment in American history, following the Great Migration, which saw millions of African-Americans move from the rural South to the urban centres of the North. This mass migration was fuelled by the search for economic opportunity and escape from the systemic oppression of the segregated South. On arrival in the North, however, although African Americans found relative economic improvement, they were confronted with a new set of challenges: racial discrimination, xenophobia, and competition for resources in densely populated cities. Faced with these challenges, the African-American community of Harlem and other urban enclaves used art, music, literature and theatre as a means of defence and expression. By challenging dominant stereotypes and asserting their own image and identity, African-Americans began to redefine what it meant to be black in America. Figures such as Langston Hughes, with his vibrant poetry that celebrated the beauty and complexity of black life, or Zora Neale Hurston, whose works explored the richness of African-American traditions, challenged stereotypes and created more nuanced and positive representations of African-Americans. Musicians such as Duke Ellington and Billie Holiday broke down racial barriers, allowing black music to reach a wider audience and be recognised for its artistic merit. In addition, magazines such as "The Crisis", published by the NAACP under the editorship of W.E.B. Du Bois, or "Opportunity", edited by Charles S. Johnson, provided platforms for black voices, highlighting issues specific to the community and promoting ideas of progress and emancipation. But more than anything, the Harlem Renaissance was a movement of empowerment. It provided the African-American community with a sense of pride, solidarity and identity at a time when it desperately needed them. It was a cry of resistance against oppression and an affirmation of the beauty, value and dignity of black life.

The Harlem Renaissance, beyond its invaluable contributions to literature and the arts, was a vibrant manifesto of the African-American experience in the context of early twentieth-century American society. It was a period of awakening in which black creativity was vividly expressed, challenging racial stereotypes and seeking to reshape black identity in an often hostile landscape. Writers such as Langston Hughes, Claude McKay and Zora Neale Hurston explored the complexities of black life, blending joy, pain, hope and despair into a mosaic that represented an often marginalised experience. Hughes, for example, in his famous poem "The Negro Speaks of Rivers", drew a link between African Americans and ancient African civilisations, evoking an ancestral pride. Claude McKay, with his poem "If We Must Die", spoke of resistance and dignity in the face of oppression. Zora Neale Hurston, on the other hand, delved into the culture of the rural south of the United States, focusing on African-American customs, language and traditions, showing an aspect of black life that was often ignored or mocked by mainstream society. His novel Their Eyes Were Watching God is a powerful tale of love, independence and the search for identity. In art, figures such as Aaron Douglas captured the essence of this era through works that incorporated both elements of African art and modernist themes. His illustrations, often used in Harlem Renaissance publications, reflected the movement's ambition to create a symbiosis between the African past and the contemporary African-American experience. Theatre and music also played a crucial role. Plays such as Eugene O'Neill's "The Emperor Jones", with a black protagonist, broke with theatrical conventions. Jazz, born out of the black musical traditions of the South, became the sonic expression of the era, with legendary figures such as Duke Ellington, Louis Armstrong and Bessie Smith redefining the American musical landscape.

The Harlem Renaissance produced an impressive array of talent whose impact spanned time and cultural boundaries, indelibly influencing American cultural tapestry. Langston Hughes, with his poetic lyricism, captured the essence of African-American life, its dreams, hopes and struggles. His poem "I, Too" is a powerful affirmation of the place of African-Americans in society, a direct response to the segregation and inequalities of his time. Zora Neale Hurston defied convention by focusing on the lives of black women in the South, blending folklore and realism. "Their Eyes Were Watching God is a testament to her unique vision, exploring themes of female independence, love and the search for identity. James Baldwin, although associated with an era slightly after the Harlem Renaissance, continued the legacy of the movement by tackling issues of race, sexuality and religion head-on in works such as "Go Tell It on the Mountain" and "Notes of a Native Son". In visual art, Aaron Douglas fused elements of African art with modernism, creating pieces symbolic of the struggle and aspirations of African Americans. Jacob Lawrence told stories through his series of paintings, notably his series "The Migration", which depicts the mass movement of blacks from the rural South to the industrial cities of the North. Romare Bearden, with her expressive collages, captured the dynamics of black urban life, mixing reality and abstraction. Duke Ellington and his orchestra revolutionised jazz music, introducing a sophistication and complexity that took the genre to new heights. Bessie Smith, the "Empress of the Blues", sang with a power and emotion that captured the essence of black life in the South. Each of these artists, in their own way, not only influenced African-American culture, but also pushed American society to confront its own prejudices and inequalities, while enriching the country's artistic panorama with works of immense beauty and depth.

The Harlem Renaissance was not just an explosion of artistic expression, but also a profoundly significant political and social movement. At a time when segregation was rampant and Jim Crow laws were firmly in place, this period saw the birth of a new black consciousness and a sense of shared identity. African Americans used art as a means of challenging stereotypical representations of themselves, redefining their identity and fighting for civic equality. Jazz and blues, in particular, have become instruments of expression for the pain, joy, love, loss, injustice and hope of the African-American community. These musical genres, born out of the experiences of African-Americans, have resonated far beyond their home communities and have profoundly influenced American and world music. The clubs and jazz scenes of Harlem and Chicago attracted multiracial audiences, breaking down some of the racial barriers of the time. Places like the Cotton Club in Harlem became icons of the era, attracting renowned artists and audiences from all over to enjoy the music and thriving culture. In literature, African-American authors tackled subjects such as racism, integration, Black Pride, the dynamics of North versus South and many other themes that were central to the concerns of the black community. These works were an invitation to reflection and conversation about the place of African-Americans in American society. Ultimately, the Harlem Renaissance was a time when African Americans not only celebrated their unique cultural heritage, but also strongly asserted their right to equality, justice and freedom of expression. The movement laid the foundations for important social and political advances in later years, including the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s.

Jazz and blues were fundamental pillars of the Harlem Renaissance, serving as the sonic backdrop to this period of creativity and affirmation. These genres were pure expressions of the complexity, richness and diversity of the African-American experience, capturing both joy and pain, hope and disillusionment. Jazz was a musical revolution, fusing a multitude of influences, from African rhythms to European melodies, creating a distinctive sound that reflected the unique amalgam of experiences of the black diaspora. Harlem's jazz clubs, such as the aforementioned Cotton Club and the Savoy Ballroom, became places where this music could flourish, and where musicians and listeners of all backgrounds could come together. Duke Ellington, with his orchestra, became the face of sophisticated jazz, mixing classical orchestration with jazz improvisation. He was recognised not only for his musical talent, but also for his ability to compose pieces that told stories and evoked emotions. Louis Armstrong, on the other hand, brought a sense of spontaneity and innovation, revolutionising trumpet playing and singing with his unique voice and inventive improvisations. His ability to infuse emotion into every note has made his music timeless. The popularity of these and other musicians of the era helped elevate jazz and blues to the status of central American art forms, influencing generations of musicians and contributing to the richness of American culture. Their influence extended beyond the black community, breaking down racial and cultural barriers and establishing jazz as a universally respected musical genre.

During the Harlem Renaissance, literature played an essential role in articulating and disseminating the African-American voice beyond the boundaries of Harlem or black communities. These writers, using the power of the pen, portrayed the complexity of African-American experiences, which were often in contrast to the stereotypical representation of African-Americans in mainstream American culture. Writers such as Langston Hughes expressed pride in black culture while criticising social injustice and discrimination. His poem "The Negro Speaks of Rivers" is an ode to African origins and the shared heritage of the African diaspora. Hughes, along with other writers, used literature as a means of reaffirming the dignity, beauty and richness of African-American culture. Zora Neale Hurston, with her novel Their Eyes Were Watching God, offered a profound exploration of the life and loves of a black woman in the rural South, offering a nuanced portrayal that ran counter to the usual caricatures. Claude McKay, with his poem "If We Must Die", captured the feeling of resistance in the face of oppression. His writings expressed the desire for freedom and equality at a time of great racial tension. Alain Locke, as a philosopher and editor, helped promote and publish many of these writers in his influential anthology "The New Negro", which served as a manifesto for the Harlem Renaissance. The availability of these works in magazines such as "The Crisis", published by the NAACP, and "Opportunity", published by the National Urban League, helped to reach a wide and diverse audience. Many members of the white cultural elite of the time, fascinated by this artistic effervescence, also helped to promote and fund many of the artists of the Harlem Renaissance.

W.E.B. Du Bois is a monumental figure in the history of civil rights in the United States and in the intellectual development of the twentieth century. His contributions are wide-ranging and profound in many fields, including sociology, history, journalism and politics. His 1903 work "The Souls of Black Folk" is probably the most famous. This collection of essays explores the concept of "double-consciousness", a sensation Du Bois describes as the feeling of always being "observed by eyes other than one's own". This is particularly relevant for African-Americans who had to constantly juggle their black identity with their American aspirations. In 1909, Du Bois was one of the founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). As editor of the organisation's magazine, 'The Crisis', for nearly 25 years, he used this platform to promote African-American literature, art and politics. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington were two of the most influential African-American voices of their time, but they had divergent philosophies on how African-Americans should approach issues of racism and discrimination. While Washington advocated a more conciliatory approach, suggesting that African Americans should accept segregation for the time being and focus on upliftment through education and work, Du Bois opposed this vision. He argued for classical education and for direct and immediate resistance to segregation and discrimination. Furthermore, Du Bois believed that the fate of African Americans would be determined by the efforts and leadership of a tenth of their population, whom he called the 'Talented Tenth'. He believed that this group, through higher education and civic engagement, could be at the forefront of the struggle for rights and equality. Later in life, Du Bois became increasingly involved in pan-African and international issues. He helped found several Pan-African Congresses and devoted himself to the cause of world peace and disarmament. The life and work of W.E.B. Du Bois shaped not only the Harlem Renaissance and the civil rights movement, but also African-American studies and sociological thought. He is undoubtedly one of the most influential intellectual figures in American history.

W.E.B. Du Bois was a central figure during the Harlem Renaissance, playing a decisive role in shaping the intellectual and political discourse of the period. With "The Crisis", he not only provided a space for African-American literature, art and social commentary, but also for the defence of civil rights, the promotion of racial equality and the condemnation of racism. Du Bois' influence was such that 'The Crisis' became one of the most widely read magazines in the African-American community, helping to bring to light the talents of black writers, poets, artists and journalists who might otherwise have been overlooked or marginalised. His role within the NAACP was equally significant. As one of its founders, he was instrumental in leading the organisation through its early decades, advocating for education, voting rights, and other fundamental rights for African Americans. His activism and commitment greatly contributed to laying the foundations for the civil rights movements of the following decades.

W.E.B. Du Bois's choice to move the NAACP headquarters to Harlem was both strategic and symbolic. During this period, Harlem was emerging as the beating heart of African-American creativity, intellectuality and activism. It offered an unrivalled platform for black voices - whether literary, musical or political. Du Bois recognised the value of Harlem's geographical location. By locating the NAACP there, he placed the organisation at the centre of this effervescence. This strategic decision not only strengthened the link between the cultural movement of the Harlem Renaissance and the struggle for civil rights, but also gave the NAACP greater visibility and proximity to influential thinkers, artists and activists. The merger of these two movements - cultural and political - had profound implications. It encouraged a symbiosis between art and activism, with each aspect nourishing and reinforcing the other. So while artists like Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston were giving voice to the African-American experience, the NAACP was working to translate these cultural expressions into concrete change for African-Americans across the country.

The Great Migration is one of the largest demographic movements in the history of the United States. Between 1915 and 1970, around six million African-Americans moved from the Southern states to the North, West and Midwest of the country. Although there were many reasons for this migration, two major factors motivated it: the search for better-paid industrial jobs in the cities of the North, and escape from racial violence and the oppressive segregation of Jim Crow laws in the South. The mass arrival of African-Americans in Northern cities had profound social, economic and cultural implications. Economically, they bolstered the industrial workforce of cities such as Chicago, Detroit and Philadelphia, particularly during the First World War and the Second World War, when demand for factory workers was high. Culturally, the increased presence of African Americans in these cities led to an explosion of creativity and artistic expression, particularly in Harlem, New York, which became the focal point of the Harlem Renaissance. This period saw the flowering of a rich tapestry of African-American art, literature, music and theatre. Socially, the Great Migration also brought challenges. New arrivals often faced hostility from existing residents, including other immigrant communities. In addition, rapid population growth in some areas led to tensions over resources, housing and jobs, sometimes leading to racial tensions, such as the 1919 race riots in Chicago. However, despite these challenges, the Great Migration fundamentally transformed the urban, social and cultural landscape of the United States. It helped shape modern African-American identity, redefine the concept of the black community and lay the foundations for the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s.

In Detroit, as in other Northern cities, African-Americans sought to build a new life away from the rigours and brutal segregation of the South. With the exponential growth of the black population, many African-American institutions and businesses sprang up, reflecting a dynamic and growing community. Churches, businesses, newspapers and social clubs were established to serve and support the African-American community. The automotive industry, in particular, offered employment opportunities for many migrants. Although many African-Americans were initially hired for low-paid, physically demanding jobs, their presence in the industry became indispensable. However, they often had to work under less favourable conditions and for lower wages than their white counterparts. Despite the economic opportunities, discrimination was not absent. In many cases, African-Americans were confined to specific neighbourhoods, and these areas were often overcrowded and had poor infrastructure. Racial barriers were also in place in many public institutions and workplaces. Racial tensions sometimes erupted, as in the Detroit race riots of 1943. Nevertheless, Detroit saw the emergence of a robust black middle class and an influential cultural and political elite. Figures such as Reverend C.L. Franklin, father of Aretha Franklin, and Coleman Young, Detroit's first black mayor, played key roles in defending the rights and interests of African-Americans in the city. The increased presence of African Americans in Detroit and their participation in the city's economic and political life not only transformed local culture, but also had repercussions on a national scale. Detroit became one of the main centres of black activism, with many organisations, including the NAACP, playing an active role in fighting discrimination and defending the rights of African-Americans.

The impact of the Great Migration on transforming the political, economic and cultural landscape of the United States cannot be underestimated. Northern cities saw an influx of African-American workers who, as well as seeking economic opportunities, also brought with them a rich culture, an unshakeable determination and a willingness to fight for equal rights. As the demographics of Northern cities changed, so did the political influence of African Americans. For many black Northerners, the fight against segregation and discrimination in the South was deeply personal. Many were either migrants themselves or the direct descendants of those who had fled the South, and so the issue of civil rights resonated deeply in their hearts and minds. This new population was not only a workforce, but also a force for change. The NAACP, founded in 1909, played a pivotal role in this fight for equality. Although it operated on a national scale, much of its strength came from its local branches in Northern cities, where it organised demonstrations, boycotts and provided legal aid to those fighting discrimination. These collective actions formed the basis of the protest movements that would later culminate, in the 1950s and 1960s, in a veritable civil rights revolution. The influx of African-Americans to the North also stimulated the economic development of the community. Many black entrepreneurs seized the opportunity to meet the needs of the growing population. Whether through beauty salons, restaurants, shops or publishing houses, the black community began to establish its own economy. This internal economic growth not only enabled many African-Americans to climb the social ladder, it also generated a pride and confidence that translated into greater political influence.

Although the Northern United States did not have the same explicitly segregationist Jim Crow laws as the South, discrimination was still endemic in many respects. Structural and institutional forms of discrimination were common, and African Americans in the North often found themselves facing a different, but equally oppressive, set of barriers. De facto segregation in Northern cities was largely the result of unofficial practices and policies that limited the opportunities and rights of African Americans. For example, 'redlining', a practice where banks refused to lend money or offered less favourable rates to people living in certain areas, usually those that were predominantly black, prevented many African Americans from accessing home ownership and economic mobility. Maps of these areas were often marked in red, hence the term "redlining". In addition, landlords and estate agents often refused to sell or rent properties to African-Americans outside specific areas, confining them to urban ghettos. These areas were often overcrowded, with poor quality housing, and were poorly served in terms of infrastructure and public services. In terms of education, de facto segregation meant that black children were often confined to underfunded, overcrowded schools that offered a poorer quality of education. These schools were generally located in predominantly black neighbourhoods, and as most school funding came from local taxes, schools in poorer neighbourhoods had fewer resources. Unequal access to employment was also a major problem. Although African-Americans could get jobs in the North, they were often confined to low-paid, menial positions. In addition, trade unions, which were a major force in many Northern industries, were often reluctant to take on black members, limiting their opportunities for employment and advancement.

US foreign policy has often been influenced by racial attitudes throughout history. After the Spanish-American War of 1898, the US acquired new territories, including the Philippines, Puerto Rico and Guam. In these territories, the US adopted a paternalistic approach, often treating local populations as 'children' in need of American 'guidance'. This is particularly evident in the Philippines, where an insurrection against American rule was brutally suppressed. During the first decades of the 20th century, the United States intervened on several occasions in Central America and the Caribbean. These interventions, although officially justified by the protection of American interests or the fight against communism, were often underpinned by paternalistic rhetoric. The United States believed, in essence, that it knew what was best for these nations. US immigration policy also reflected these racial attitudes. Laws such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which banned Chinese immigration, are striking examples. Foreign relations were also affected by these attitudes, as evidenced by the agreements negotiated with Japan to limit Japanese immigration. At the same time, the Monroe Doctrine and Roosevelt's corollary solidified the idea that the Western Hemisphere was the "preserve" of the United States. Although they were conceived as measures to protect against European intervention, they were often used to justify American intervention in the affairs of other nations on the continent. Finally, the construction of the Panama Canal illustrates another facet of this attitude. During its construction, black workers in the West Indies in particular were paid less and treated worse than white workers. These examples show how racial perceptions influenced the way the United States interacted with foreign nations and peoples.

The Great Migration, which saw millions of African Americans leave the rural South for the industrial cities of the North and West between 1916 and 1970, was a turning point in American history. While it offered new economic opportunities to migrants, it also exacerbated racial tensions in the regions they reached. African-Americans fled the segregation, Jim Crow laws and racism of the South, hoping to find a better life in the North. However, when they arrived in these cities, they were often greeted with hostility. Competition for jobs, particularly during and after the First World War, when Europe was in conflict and demand for industrial goods was at its peak, exacerbated tensions between white and black workers. In addition, competition for affordable housing also led to friction, as African-Americans were often confined to overcrowded and unsanitary neighbourhoods. Tensions sometimes degenerated into violence. For example, in 1919, a series of race riots broke out in several American cities, the deadliest of which took place in Chicago. An incident at a racially segregated beach sparked a week of violence, during which 38 people (23 black and 15 white) were killed and more than 500 were injured. At the same time, African-Americans in the North began to organise and mobilise for their rights, supported by African-American newspapers and community leaders. They also brought with them the richness of Southern culture, contributing to the Harlem Renaissance and other artistic and cultural movements in the North.

Faced with pervasive discrimination and the many challenges they faced in American society, many African-Americans turned to black nationalist movements in the early twentieth century. Far from mere protest, these movements aimed primarily to strengthen the black community from within, emphasising autonomy, self-determination and pride in race. The Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA), founded by Marcus Garvey in 1914, is an emblematic example. Garvey advocated black pride, economic self-sufficiency and the idea of pan-Africanism. For him, African Americans could never achieve their full potential in a white-dominated society. He envisioned the creation of a powerful black nation in Africa. Under his leadership, the UNIA created black-owned businesses, including the Black Star Line, a shipping company. Although some of his ventures failed and Garvey himself was criticised and eventually deported, the impact of his philosophy persisted, inspiring other black nationalist movements throughout the century. The Nation of Islam is another example. Founded in the 1930s, it gained popularity in the 1950s and 1960s under the leadership of Elijah Muhammad. With its message of autonomy, self-sufficiency and an Islam specifically adapted to the African-American experience, the Nation offered an attractive alternative to the integration advocated by other civil rights figures. The Nation of Islam also launched businesses, schools and social programmes, while advocating a healthy lifestyle for its members. These movements were influential in many ways, offering not only solutions to socio-economic challenges, but also a sense of dignity, pride and identity to millions of African-Americans at a time when discrimination was the norm. They challenged the logic of integration and offered an alternative vision of success and self-actualisation for black Americans.

The era of European nationalism, which peaked in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, exerted considerable influence on movements around the world, including black nationalist movements in the United States. The rise of nation states in Europe, based on a common identity, culture and history, presented a model for mobilising and organising around shared values and territorial claims. The concepts of sovereignty and self-determination, widely discussed during the creation of the League of Nations after the First World War, reinforced these ideas. This was particularly relevant in the context of declining colonial empires, where oppressed peoples in Africa, Asia and elsewhere aspired to their own freedom and independence. In the United States, African-Americans, although integrated for several generations, still faced segregation, discrimination and violence. In this context, European nationalist movements offered a source of inspiration. The notion that peoples with a common identity and experience should have the right to govern themselves resonated with those seeking an escape from white domination in the United States. Marcus Garvey, for example, drew on these nationalist movements to promote his own vision of pan-Africanism, which envisaged the return of African descendants to their continent of origin to establish a great unified nation. For Garvey, the right of African Americans to self-determination lay in the creation of a strong and independent African nation. The ideas of nationalism, autonomy and self-determination played a crucial role in shaping black nationalist movements in the United States. The situation in Europe and the liberation struggles in the colonies provided models and inspiration for African-Americans in their quest for equality, respect and autonomy.

Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) played a crucial role in defining a vision of black nationalism in the early twentieth century. While most civil rights leaders of the time advocated integration and equal rights within American society, Garvey proposed a radically different solution: the emancipation of African-Americans through economic separation and, eventually, repatriation to Africa. Under the banner "Africa for Africans", Garvey envisaged a great united African diaspora, returning to the continent to establish a powerful and prosperous nation. For him, the racism and discrimination that prevailed in the United States made integration impossible; the only solution was a return to African roots. Garvey's economic philosophy was centred on the idea of self-sufficiency. He believed that African Americans could never be free as long as they were economically dependent on the white community. The UNIA therefore encouraged the creation of black businesses and even founded the Black Star Line, a shipping company designed to facilitate trade between black communities around the world, and potentially, to facilitate repatriation to Africa. The Garveyite movement also emphasised black pride, encouraging African Americans to be proud of their African heritage, skin colour and history. Garvey was often criticised by other black leaders of the time for his separatist ideas, but he nevertheless managed to mobilise millions of African Americans around his vision and his organisation.

Marcus Garvey was a fervent advocate of 'racial pride' and urged African Americans to reclaim and celebrate their African heritage. In an era of pervasive racism and discrimination, his message sought to counterbalance the self-hatred and inferiority that many blacks felt as a result of societal oppression. By embracing the beauty, culture and history of Africa, Garvey believed that African Americans could free themselves mentally and spiritually from the shackles of white domination. Unlike other civil rights leaders of his time, Garvey was firmly opposed to the idea of racial integration. He saw integration as an insufficient, even harmful, solution to the problems facing African-Americans. For him, harmonious coexistence with those who had historically oppressed Blacks was an illusion. Moreover, he believed that integration would lead to the dissolution of the unique black identity and assimilation into a dominant white culture. His ideas led to the promotion of the creation of an independent nation for African Americans. Garvey envisaged a great migration back to Africa, where African Americans could establish their own nation, free from oppression and discrimination. For him, it was only in such a context that black people could truly be free and equal. While this vision was never fully realised, and while many contemporaries and critics found his separatist ideas controversial, Garvey's influence has left an indelible mark. His promotion of black pride and self-determination laid the foundations for future movements and inspired generations of African-American activists and thinkers.

The Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) struck a chord with many African Americans, particularly in the tumultuous context of the early twentieth century. Garvey's exhortation to racial pride, self-determination and economic emancipation was exactly what many blacks needed to hear in the face of institutionalised discrimination and open racial animosity. The success of the UNIA reflected this need. With its thriving businesses, such as the Black Star Line, and its influential newspaper, the Negro World, the organisation offered a vision of self-reliance and prosperity for the black community. Yet, as is often the case in movements for rights and justice, there were differences of opinion about how best to achieve emancipation. Marcus Garvey emphasised separatism and the creation of a powerful autonomous black economy, while others, like W.E.B. Du Bois, believed strongly in working within the existing system to achieve equal rights for all, regardless of the colour of their skin. Du Bois, as one of the founders of the NAACP, advocated education, political action and integration to achieve racial equality. He believed that African Americans should educate and uplift themselves through the system, fighting for equal rights and working to abolish systemic discrimination. This divergence of opinions and strategies led to tension and conflict within the black rights movement. Garvey and Du Bois, in particular, had a notoriously tense relationship, with each criticising the other's approach. While both men shared the ultimate goal of emancipation and equality for African Americans, their visions of the road ahead were fundamentally different.

The movement led by Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) represented a radically different vision for African American emancipation at the time. While Garvey advocated a separatist approach, with an emphasis on the return to Africa and the creation of a strong black nation, others, such as those in the NAACP and the National Urban League, firmly believed in integration and the achievement of equal rights within the existing system in the United States. The NAACP, with its roots in the struggle to end racial violence and promote integration, often saw Garvey's approach as counterproductive. The National Urban League, with its focus on economic integration and improving urban living conditions for blacks, also felt that Garvey's vision was not aligned with their goals. The US government, for its part, saw Garvey and the UNIA as a potential threat. His bold calls for black self-determination, combined with his massive rallies and growing influence, alarmed the authorities. The FBI, under the direction of J. Edgar Hoover, set about monitoring and disrupting the UNIA, which eventually led to Garvey's arrest on charges of mail fraud in connection with the Black Star Line. After serving part of his sentence, he was deported to Jamaica in 1927. Nevertheless, despite opposition and setbacks, the impact of Garvey and the UNIA has not been erased. The ideals of black nationalism and self-determination that he advocated resonated with future generations, particularly during the 1960s and 1970s with the rise of the Black Power movement. The Harlem Renaissance, with its rich tapestry of art, literature and music, also had a profound influence on African-American consciousness and culture, embedding a deep sense of pride and identity that endures to this day.

The Harlem Renaissance was a flourishing period for African-American arts, culture and intellectual expression, and at the heart of this renaissance was the concept of the 'New Negro'. This idea embodied the socio-cultural transformation of African Americans in the early twentieth century, where a new consciousness and sense of self was emerging. Contrary to the old image of the submissive and oppressed black man, the 'New Negro' was rising up, educated, articulate and determined to fight for his rights and reassert his place in American society. Alain Locke, one of the most influential figures of this period, played a leading role in the formulation and dissemination of this notion. His anthology "The New Negro: An Interpretation" was more than just a collection of works; it was a bold proclamation of the birth of a new African-American identity. Locke brought together writers, poets, artists and intellectuals who, through their work, gave voice to this transformation. These artists, such as Langston Hughes with his vivid poetry, Zora Neale Hurston with her captivating prose and Countee Cullen with her lyrical poetry, illustrated the diversity, richness and complexity of the black experience. But this idea was not limited to art and literature; it also extended to political activism. The "New Negro" was aware of his civil rights and ready to fight for them. The Harlem Renaissance was a period of artistic expression, but it was also deeply political, as it sought to challenge and dismantle prevailing racial stereotypes and claim a place for African Americans in the American cultural and political panorama. The 'New Negro' movement not only left an indelible artistic legacy, but also paved the way for the civil rights movements that were to follow, underlining the power of art and culture in the fight for equality and justice.

The Protestant and Anglo-Saxon reaction[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

Discrimination and marginalisation of non-WASP Americans and immigrants[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The decade of the 1920s in the United States is often remembered as a period of economic, social and cultural ferment. This era, marked by widespread optimism, was characterised by rapid economic growth, technological innovation and rapid cultural transformation. The country saw the rise of the automobile, film and radio industries, which greatly influenced the American way of life. Politically, the Republican Party, with its three successive presidents - Harding, Coolidge and Hoover - dominated the national scene. These presidents emphasised a less interventionist form of government, letting the economy operate with minimal regulation. They firmly believed in the efficiency of the free market. In addition, to stimulate domestic economic growth and protect American industries, these presidents adopted protectionist policies. High tariffs, such as the Fordney-McCumber Tariff of 1922, were introduced to protect American producers from foreign competition. This favoured domestic companies, but also led to trade tensions with other nations. Although the US economy was thriving, the situation in Europe was quite different. After the First World War, the continent was plagued by economic, political and social instability. War debts, soaring inflation, punitive peace treaties and reparations exacerbated economic difficulties, particularly in Germany. These economic challenges, coupled with nationalist and revanchist sentiments, led to the rise of radical political movements, notably Fascism in Italy and Nazism in Germany. Despite this turmoil in Europe, American presidents in the 1920s largely adopted an isolationist policy, choosing to focus primarily on domestic affairs and avoiding deep involvement in European problems. This approach was finally put to the test with the economic collapse of 1929, known as the Great Depression, which not only shook the United States but also had global repercussions, further exacerbating the problems in Europe and leading to a new period of global turmoil.

The 1920s in the United States, often referred to as the "Roaring Twenties", were synonymous with economic prosperity, innovation and social change. Under the leadership of Republican presidents Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover, the US economy grew rapidly, with a strong emphasis on the principles of "absolute liberalism" or laissez-faire. These principles were based on the belief that markets worked best when government intervention was minimal. One of the main manifestations of this economic liberalism was the drastic reduction of taxes, particularly for the wealthiest corporations and citizens. The advocates of these cuts claimed that they would stimulate investment, generate economic growth and ultimately benefit all segments of society. And for much of the decade, this prosperity seemed evident, at least on the surface. The stock market soared, businesses prospered, and technological innovations like radio and the automobile became accessible to millions of Americans. However, this prosperity was not evenly distributed. Tax policy and economic liberalism accentuated the concentration of wealth in the hands of a minority. While the middle class enjoyed a certain level of comfort, workers, farmers and, in particular, the African-American population continued to face major economic challenges. Wage inequality widened, and many workers and farmers struggled to make ends meet. African-Americans, meanwhile, were often relegated to low-paid jobs and faced institutional discrimination, in addition to the general economic challenges of the time. In the end, the 1920s were marked by a paradox: a period of dazzling prosperity for some, but also a period of persistent hardship for others. These economic inequalities, along with the underlying structural weaknesses of the economy, would be laid bare with the collapse of the stock market in 1929, giving rise to the Great Depression. This economic catastrophe challenged the foundations of absolute liberalism and led to a fundamental re-examination of the role of government in the economy during the 1930s.

During the 1920s, American agriculture underwent major upheavals that caused many small farmers to go bankrupt or abandon their farms. The First World War had created a high demand for agricultural products, prompting farmers to increase production and take on debt to buy land and equipment. However, once the war was over, European demand for agricultural products fell, leading to overproduction and a drastic fall in prices. Mechanisation exacerbated this problem. While machines such as combines and tractors made production more efficient, they also required heavy investment and put farmers deeper into debt. What's more, they reduced the need for labour, pushing many farm workers out of farming. As a result, many small farmers, unable to compete with the larger, better-equipped and often more diversified farms, went bankrupt or were forced to sell their land. This led to mass migration to the cities, where former farmers sought work in a booming industrial environment. Unfortunately, government policies at the time offered no real safety net or support for these struggling farmers. The credo of "absolute liberalism" advocated minimal government intervention in the economy. Tax cuts and business-friendly policies mainly benefited urban industries and the wealthiest, leaving many farmers out in the cold. This neglect of the agricultural sector had major social repercussions. Poverty has increased in rural areas, with rates surpassing those in urban areas. In addition, the agricultural crisis created a growing disparity between rural and urban areas, a phenomenon that would influence the economic and political dynamics of the United States for decades to come.

The 1920s witnessed a striking contrast between the economic prosperity of urban areas and the persistent difficulties of agricultural regions. The introduction of advanced agricultural technologies and mechanisation led to a considerable increase in production. But this increase in productivity has had a perverse effect: massive overproduction. With an abundant supply of agricultural products on the market, prices have fallen drastically. For large farms, these technological changes were often synonymous with profit, as they were able to spread their fixed costs over a larger output and diversify their activities. For small farmers, on the other hand, often specialised and less inclined or unable to invest in new technology, lower prices meant reduced or non-existent margins. Debts piled up, and without adequate support from government policies, many farmers found themselves unable to keep their farms afloat. The 'absolute liberalism' of the 1920s, with little government intervention in the economy and favouring the interests of big business and wealthy individuals, left small farmers to fend for themselves. Rather than providing concrete support or seeking solutions to the agricultural crisis, the administration focused on policies that exacerbated existing inequalities. Many farmers, unable to maintain their lifestyle in the countryside, have been forced to seek new opportunities in urban areas, exacerbating the decline of rural areas. Not only did this migration displace people, it also reinforced the cultural, economic and political gap between urban and rural areas, a gap that in many ways persists to this day. The plight of farmers during this decade is a poignant testament to how technological advances and misguided economic policies can have unexpected and often devastating consequences for parts of society.

During the 1920s in the United States, certain groups became the prime targets of these scapegoating mechanisms. African-Americans, recent immigrants, particularly from Eastern Europe and Italy, and religious groups such as Catholics and Jews were often unfairly blamed for the social and economic ills that afflicted the country. One of the most glaring examples of this period was the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan, which had originally been founded during the post-Civil War Reconstruction period. In the 1920s, the Klan underwent a revival, presenting itself as the defender of Protestant white supremacy and 'traditional' America against the changing forces of modernity. This has led to a rise in racial violence and the persecution of minority groups. The passage of immigration quota laws during this decade, which sought to limit immigration from certain parts of the world deemed 'undesirable', is another example of how prejudice has shaped national policy. These laws reflect a deep anxiety about the changing nature of American identity at a time of rapid change. The process of scapegoating is not just about finding someone to blame, it is also part of a wider dynamic of searching for national identity and cohesion. In times of economic, social or political stress, the need for unity and stability can lead to the marginalisation and stigmatisation of those perceived as different or foreign. This serves to reinforce an idea of belonging and solidarity within the majority group, even if it is at the expense of others.

During the 1920s, the Ku Klux Klan underwent a major transformation from its original post-Civil War incarnation. Whereas the first Klan was primarily based in the South and focused on suppressing the civil rights of African Americans, the Klan of the 1920s was much more national in scope. It spread well beyond the South, establishing a strong presence in states such as Indiana and Illinois. Faced with a growing wave of immigration from Eastern Europe and Italy, this Klan developed a nativist sentiment, taking a firm stance against immigration. In addition to its traditional hatred of African-Americans, it has shown hostility towards Catholics and Jews, seeing these groups as a threat to America's Protestant and Anglo-Saxon identity. Politically, the Klan has acquired considerable influence. In some states and municipalities, it has become a key political player, supporting or opposing candidates on the basis of their alignment with Klan ideology. For example, its influence was strongly felt at the 1924 Democratic Party Convention. Another striking feature of this renewed Klan was its adoption of formal rituals and ceremonies. It regularly organised parades to galvanise its members and publicly demonstrate its power. These events were clear manifestations of the Klan's identity and mission. The rise of the Klan in the 1920s was a direct response to the cultural and social tensions of the time. Many Americans, faced with the changing realities of urbanisation, industrialisation and immigration, were looking for answers and the Klan offered them one, albeit a simplistic one. It promised its members a clear identity and mission, while blaming minority groups for society's ills. Towards the end of the decade, however, the Klan began to lose ground. Internal scandals, growing opposition and the mobilisation of its detractors contributed to its decline. Although it never completely disappeared, its influence and power were considerably reduced.

In 1925, the Ku Klux Klan reached its zenith with a claimed 5 million active members. This made the Klan one of the most dominant entities in the United States. But with this dominance came a frightening rise in violent acts tinged with racism. Lynchings, in particular, were on the increase, extending far beyond the borders of the traditional South to the West and parts of the North. And contrary to popular belief, these acts were not aimed solely at African-Americans. Other groups such as Italians, Jews, Mexicans and Catholics were also targeted. However, of all these groups, African-Americans were the most affected. They were the predominant targets of lynchings, bombings and other forms of brutality perpetrated by the Klan and similar groups. The terror these acts inflicted on these communities was amplified by the flagrant lack of intervention by the police and elected representatives. This passivity, even complicity, on the part of the authorities in these odious acts only added to the atmosphere of fear and intimidation. This dark period in American history left deep and lasting scars, not only among African-Americans, but also among other minority groups. The repercussions of this racial violence reshaped the social, political and economic fabric of the country, effects that continue to be felt decades later.

Although the Ku Klux Klan enjoyed immense popularity in the 1920s, it is alarming to note that their violent and racist acts were rarely countered by the government and the forces of law and order. This apathy, or even passive complicity, gave the Klan a sense of impunity, reinforcing their audacity and ability to terrorise entire communities. However, although the Klan's influence began to wane towards the end of the 1920s, the shadow of their presence continued to haunt America well beyond that decade. The hatred, violence and racism they injected into the fabric of American society left lasting scars. This toxic legacy helped shape the country's race relations, politics and culture for many years after the apparent fall of their direct influence. As the decade of the 1920s drew to a close, the Ku Klux Klan saw its power erode. Internal divisions, often accompanied by power struggles, undermined the unity of the group. This was exacerbated by the light shed on endemic corruption and other wrongdoing by its members, exposed by high-profile scandals. Such revelations have tarnished the Klan's reputation in the eyes of the public, making its efforts to recruit and maintain influence all the more difficult. At the same time, rising public awareness and outrage at the horrors perpetrated by the Klan played a crucial role in its decline. Prominent figures and civil rights organisations bravely denounced the Klan, highlighting its hatred and bigotry. Their work helped to mobilise public opinion against the group. Although the Klan went into sharp decline in the early 1930s, it would be unwise to assume that its impact had completely dissipated. The ideas it propagated and the violence it inflicted left deep scars on American society. These scars serve as a reminder of extremism's ability to take root and the importance of remaining vigilant against hatred.

The immigrants[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

During the 1920s, the socio-political landscape of the United States was strongly tinged with anti-immigrant sentiment. This mood was fuelled by a combination of economic concerns, cultural fears and ethnic prejudice. Since the beginning of the 20th century, there had been growing concern about new arrivals, particularly those from southern and eastern Europe, many of whom were Jewish or Catholic. These immigrants were often perceived as threats to the 'American' way of life, both culturally and economically. Nativists, or those who advocated protecting the interests of natives against those of immigrants, feared that these new arrivals would not assimilate and would not be loyal to their new country. The Literacy Act of 1917 was a blatant example of this mistrust. It was aimed primarily at "undesirable" immigrants, i.e. those who, according to the standards of the time, were considered less capable of assimilating into the dominant American culture. The total ban on immigration from Asia was another clear example of the racial and ethnic discrimination present in American policies at the time. Tensions sometimes culminated in acts of violence, such as demonstrations or riots directed against certain immigrant communities. These violent eruptions reflected the depth of anti-immigrant sentiment in some parts of society.

The 1920s period in the United States was marked by a series of socio-political changes, one of the most significant of which was the passage of the Immigration Act of 1924. This Act reflected the prevailing nativist sentiments of the time, when xenophobic attitudes and the desire to preserve a certain 'American' identity were commonplace. The Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, established immigration quotas based on census data dating back to 1890. The use of this older data was intentionally designed to favour immigrants from Northern and Western Europe while significantly reducing the entry of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. The latter were often perceived as less 'American' in terms of religion, culture and work ethic, with clear racial and ethnic prejudices. The law was a clear example of the then-popular eugenics ideology, which held that certain races or ethnicities were genetically superior to others. These ideas, although now largely discredited, were influential at the time and helped shape public policy. For example, immigrants from Northern and Western Europe were favoured because they were seen as more 'compatible' with mainstream American society, while others were restricted or even excluded. The result of this law was a drastic transformation of immigration patterns. Whereas previous waves of immigration had been dominated by people from Southern and Eastern Europe, the Act led to a considerable slowdown in these flows, changing the face of the immigrant diaspora in the United States. The impact of the Immigration Act of 1924 was felt for several decades, until the immigration reforms of the 1960s put an end to the discriminatory quota system. Its effects on the ethnic and cultural make-up of the United States, however, continue to resonate in contemporary society.

During the 1920s, when the United States was undergoing a period of profound cultural and economic transformation, anti-immigrant sentiment proliferated, fuelled by a variety of social and economic anxieties. The Immigration Act of 1924, with its discriminatory quotas, was one of the most notable manifestations of this. Although the Act was primarily aimed at European immigrants, mistrust of immigrants extended beyond Europe. Immigrants from the Americas, particularly Latin America, were not subject to these quotas, but that does not mean that they were welcomed with open arms. Many of them, particularly Mexican immigrants, were seen as temporary workers, coming to the US to meet a demand for low-cost labour in sectors such as agriculture, but were not necessarily seen as desirable candidates for long-term integration into American society. The press played a crucial role in the way immigrants were perceived. At a time when the media were one of the main sources of information, public opinion was influenced by often stereotypical and negative representations of immigrants, whether European, Asian or from the Americas. These depictions often portrayed immigrants as refusing to assimilate, bringing disease, engaging in criminal activity or taking jobs away from American citizens. Such portrayals created a climate of hostility and suspicion. These nativist attitudes were not new to the United States, but they took on particular significance in the post-First World War context of the 1920s, with its changing economy, rapid urbanisation and social upheaval. The Immigration Act of 1924 and the anti-immigrant sentiment it reflected were, in a sense, a response to America's anxiety about these rapid changes and the uncertainty they engendered.

The distinction made by the Immigration Act of 1924 between immigrants from the Eastern Hemisphere and those from the Western Hemisphere reflected the particular geopolitical and economic concerns of the United States at the time. The absence of quotas for countries in the Western Hemisphere, notably Mexico and Puerto Rico, can be explained in several ways. Firstly, the US economy, particularly in the South West, was heavily dependent on Mexican labour, especially in sectors such as agriculture. As a result, limiting immigration from Mexico could have had negative economic consequences for certain regions and industries. Secondly, it should be noted that Puerto Rico had been a territory of the United States since the Spanish-American War of 1898. As such, Puerto Ricans were technically US citizens and could move freely between Puerto Rico and the US mainland. However, the freedom of these immigrants to circumvent quotas did not protect them from the difficult realities of assimilation and discrimination. Mexican immigrants, for example, were often confined to low-paid jobs, lived in precarious conditions and regularly faced racial prejudice. Similarly, although Puerto Ricans were US citizens, they were often treated as foreigners in their own country, due to linguistic and cultural differences. Yet despite these challenges, Mexican and Puerto Rican immigrants played an essential role in shaping the American cultural mosaic, bringing with them traditions, cuisine, music and other cultural elements that enriched American society.

Fear of communism and the "red scare[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

Illustration from 1919 showing a "European anarchist" attacking the Statue of Liberty.

The 'Reds' became synonymous with a perceived threat to the national security and social order of the United States in the post-First World War period, particularly during what became known as the 'Red Scare'. International events, such as the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, heightened anxiety about radical movements, but it was their manifestation on American soil that caused the most concern. In 1919, a series of bomb attacks rocked the country. Parcel bombs were sent to numerous political and business leaders, including the Attorney General of the United States, A. Mitchell Palmer. These attacks were attributed to anarchists and helped to fuel an atmosphere of fear and suspicion. In response to this perceived threat, Attorney General Palmer orchestrated a series of raids to arrest and deport suspected radicals, mainly immigrants. These "Palmer raids" were widely criticised for their disregard for civil rights, as thousands were arrested without warrants and often without evidence of wrongdoing. However, the urgency of the climate at the time allowed such violations to take place. In addition, the Sedition Act of 1918, which criminalised criticism of the government or the promotion of resistance to the law, was used to prosecute and convict many individuals on the basis of their political beliefs. The association of radical or dissident ideas with immigration has reinforced anti-immigrant sentiment. Immigrants from Eastern and Southern Europe, in particular, were often stigmatised as agitators or socialists, even though the vast majority came to the United States in search of economic opportunity and had no radical political affiliations. These prejudices, fuelled by fear, played a key role in the restrictive immigration policies of the 1920s.

After the First World War, the United States went through a period of social and economic upheaval. The transition from a wartime to a peacetime economy created tensions in the labour market, and strikes became a common way for workers to demand better working conditions and wages. These strikes were often seen not as legitimate workers' demands, but as signs of a possible revolutionary upheaval inspired by socialist and communist ideas. The steelworkers' strike in 1919 was one of the largest industrial strikes in American history, involving almost 365,000 workers. It was closely followed by a general strike in Seattle, where thousands of workers staged a peaceful strike that brought the city to a standstill for several days. Although the strike was largely non-violent, it caused widespread fear among city leaders and business owners, who saw it as a potential communist insurrection. The rhetoric of the media and many government officials linked these workers' movements to the influence of the "Reds". In the context of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and the violent overthrow of governments in other regions, these fears seemed to many to be well-founded. Newspapers often portrayed the strikes as the work of Bolsheviks or foreign agitators seeking to import the revolution to the United States. In this context, repressive measures were taken. The Red Scare led to mass arrests, often without just cause, and the deportation of many immigrants accused of radicalism. Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer led raids on alleged radical groups, and the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 were used to suppress dissent. Opposition to strikes and the link made between radicalism and immigration played a part in reinforcing anti-immigrant attitudes which led to restrictive immigration laws such as the Immigration Act of 1924. In short, fear of the 'Reds' was used to justify both the repression of domestic dissent and a more isolationist approach to foreign policy and immigration.

The period following the First World War and the Russian Revolution of 1917 in the United States was marked by intense anti-communist paranoia, often referred to as the 'Red Scare'. The confluence of social unrest at home, such as mass strikes, and geopolitical upheaval abroad, such as the rise of the Bolsheviks in Russia, generated a pervasive fear of communism and other forms of radicalism. Between 1919 and 1920, Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer orchestrated a series of raids to arrest and deport foreigners suspected of radicalism. These operations, often carried out without proper warrants or tangible evidence, targeted socialists, communists, anarchists and other radical groups. Thousands were arrested and many deported. At the same time, sedition and espionage laws were implemented. These laws were used to charge individuals for speech or actions deemed seditious or anti-American. People who criticised the government or opposed conscription during the First World War were particularly likely to be targeted under these laws. Distrust of immigrants, reinforced by fears that they would bring radical ideas with them, led to calls for tighter immigration restrictions. These sentiments contributed to the passage of the Immigration Act of 1924, which introduced quotas based on nationality. In addition, workers' movements and strikes were often perceived as being influenced or led by radical forces. As a result, companies, with the support of the authorities, regularly cracked down on these movements. Culturally, fear of the "Reds" permeated popular culture at the time. The media, from films to plays to newspapers, frequently conveyed stereotypical representations of communists and radicals as threats to American identity. Although this first 'Red Scare' subsided in the early 1920s, mistrust of communism remained embedded in American politics and culture, resurfacing markedly in the 1950s with the second 'Red Scare' and the era of McCarthyism.

The Red Scare, which dominated the United States between 1919 and 1920, can be seen as a profound and sometimes irrational reaction to the world events of the time. With the end of the First World War and the emergence of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, many Americans began to fear that communist radicalism would infiltrate their country. The rapid spread of communist and socialist ideologies around the world fuelled these concerns. This fear was not isolated to government circles or high society; it seeped into the collective consciousness, where the typical 'communist' or 'socialist' was often imagined as a treacherous foreigner, ready to undermine American values and way of life. As a result, foreigners, particularly those from Eastern and Southern Europe, as well as political dissidents, were the object of intense suspicion and persecution. Immigrants with even the slightest links to radical organisations were often regarded as "enemies from within". Under the leadership of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, thousands of people were arrested in what became known as the Palmer Raids. These raids were aimed at dismantling radical groups and deporting those deemed dangerous to national security. Often carried out without respect for proper judicial procedures, these actions were criticised for their flagrant violations of civil rights. The Red Scare also led to considerable self-censorship by individuals and organisations who feared being associated with radicalism. Freedom of expression was seriously compromised, with people reluctant to express views that might be perceived as radical or un-American. Over time, although the Red Scare diminished, its effects endured. It laid the foundations for increased government surveillance and distrust of radical movements. It also left an indelible mark on the way the United States perceived domestic threats, a legacy that manifested itself again during the McCarthyism of the 1950s and in other periods of domestic political tension.

The post-war period in the United States, marked by the rise of communism in Russia and the spread of socialist ideology across Europe, gave rise to a national psychosis about the potential 'infiltration' of these ideologies on American soil. This anxiety was amplified by mass strikes, social unrest and the actions of radical groups, culminating in the Red Scare of 1919-1920. During this period, a combination of xenophobia, fear of social change and geopolitical concerns led to brutal repression of those perceived as threats to national security or the established order. Immigrants were particularly vulnerable to this repression because of persistent stereotypes associating them with radical and revolutionary activities. Many Americans considered immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, who came from regions shaken by political turbulence, to be the main vectors for the spread of these "dangerous" ideologies. Under the leadership of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, unprecedented operations were carried out to track down, arrest and deport those suspected of links with radical movements. These "Palmer raids" were based not only on concrete evidence of subversive activities, but often on suspicions or past affiliations. Fundamental rights, such as the right to a fair trial or legal representation, were often ignored, reflecting the severity of the national paranoia. The irony of this repression is that most immigrants had come to the United States in search of a better life, lured by the promise of freedom and opportunity. Instead, many were met with open hostility, discrimination and suspicion. The mass hysteria of the Red Scare not only damaged America's reputation as a welcoming land, but also highlighted the underlying tensions and prejudices that can emerge in times of national uncertainty.

During the 1920s, socio-political tensions combined with racial prejudice to create a volatile atmosphere in the United States. As fear of the "Reds" spread across the country, it intertwined with existing xenophobia and racism to form a perfect storm of animosity towards immigrants and other marginalised groups. It is worth noting that lynching, in its most widespread and violent form, was targeted primarily at African-Americans in the South. It was an instrument of brutal terror, used to maintain the system of white supremacy and to punish African-Americans who, in the attackers' view, had overstepped their bounds. Lynchings were public and theatrical acts designed to send a powerful message to the black community: subordination and submission were demanded on pain of death. However, in the paranoid climate of the 1920s, the fear of communism was also exploited to justify attacks on immigrants, particularly those from Southern and Eastern Europe. People from these regions, already facing intense stigmatisation due to cultural, linguistic and religious differences, were now also seen as potential communist sympathisers. Although immigrants were not the main target of lynchings as were African-Americans, they were victims of violence and hate crimes, often justified by a combination of racial prejudice and anti-communist fears. In this context, immigrants found themselves caught between several fronts. On the one hand, they were viewed with suspicion because of their ethnic origin and, on the other, they were perceived as potential threats to national security. These attitudes exacerbated discrimination and violence against them, illustrating how, in times of crisis or fear, existing prejudices can be amplified and directed against the most vulnerable groups in society.

Throughout history, this fear of communism has often been used as a means of controlling and repressing a variety of movements and individuals who challenged the status quo. Trade union movements, intellectuals, artists, civil rights activists and many other groups and individuals who fought for social and economic change were targeted. During the period of the Red Scare, accusations of communism were often used as a political weapon to discredit and delegitimise opponents. In the United States, for example, Senator Joseph McCarthy and others led anti-communist "witch hunts", seeking to purge alleged communists from government, entertainment, education and other sectors of society. Many individuals have had their careers destroyed and their lives turned upside down simply on the accusation of communist associations. The term "communism" became a pejorative term that was often used to discredit any left-wing or progressive movement. What was often lost in this rhetoric was the distinction between different political movements, ideologies and aspirations of the people targeted. This fear of communism was also exploited to justify interventionist foreign policies. Under the pretext of stopping the spread of communism, numerous military interventions and coups d'état were supported by Western powers, often at the expense of the democratic aspirations of local populations.

The Sacco and Vanzetti case became a symbol of the intolerance and xenophobia prevalent in the United States in the 1920s, and of the injustice of the justice system when political and social considerations interfere with the search for truth. Both men were sentenced to death in 1921. Despite numerous pleas for clemency and protests not only in the United States but also in other parts of the world, they were executed in 1927. Their trial and execution were seen by many as the product of a toxic mixture of anarchophobia, xenophobia and anti-Italianism. One of the main problems with their trial was that, although the evidence of their involvement in the crime was questionable, their known political affiliation and Italian origin played a central role in the way the case was handled by the justice system and perceived by the public. Defence lawyers argued that the evidence against Sacco and Vanzetti was insufficient and circumstantial, and that the testimony of witnesses was unreliable. However, the political and social climate of the time greatly influenced the outcome of the trial. Over the years, the Sacco and Vanzetti case has remained in the public mind as a sombre illustration of the dangers of a judicial system influenced by prejudice and irrational fears. Subsequent enquiries into the case suggested that the two men were probably innocent of the crimes for which they had been convicted. In 1977, on the 50th anniversary of their execution, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis declared that Sacco and Vanzetti had been unjustly tried and convicted, and proclaimed a day of commemoration in their honour. The declaration was not a pardon, but an official acknowledgement of the injustice that had been committed.

The affair attracted attention not only in the United States, but also internationally. Journalists, writers, artists and intellectuals from all over the world mobilised to defend Sacco and Vanzetti, highlighting the prejudices and irregularities surrounding the trial. Demonstrations and rallies were organised in several major cities around the world to demand the release of the two men. Sacco and Vanzetti's detractors often sought to discredit their supporters, accusing them of being manipulated by communist or anarchist forces. However, the lack of solid evidence against the two men and the many procedural irregularities that marked their trial have fuelled the belief that their conviction was primarily motivated by political considerations and not by factual evidence. Vanzetti's last words, spoken before their execution, reflect the two men's conviction that they were victims of a grave injustice: "I would like you to know that I am innocent... It's true that I was convicted of carrying arms... But I have never committed a crime in my life." The controversy surrounding the Sacco and Vanzetti case did not fade with their execution. It continues to be studied and debated by historians and civil rights activists as a tragic example of the dangers of prejudice and paranoia in the legal system. It also serves as a reminder of the potentially lethal consequences of xenophobia and suspicion towards people with non-conformist political beliefs.

The Sacco and Vanzetti case has become emblematic of the dangers of fear, prejudice and repression in a democratic system. These two men, despite the insufficient evidence against them, were the victims of a hostile political climate, marked by mistrust of foreigners and an irrational fear of radicalism. The speed with which they were found guilty and executed testifies to the influence of these sentiments in American society at the time. The international attention that the case attracted shows the extent to which many outside observers were concerned about the fate of human rights in the United States at the time. Demonstrations, petitions and condemnations from the four corners of the globe underlined concerns about American justice and its treatment of minorities and dissidents. Today, the Sacco and Vanzetti case is often cited in discussions about miscarriages of justice, human rights and the influence of prejudice on the legal system. It serves as a reminder of the importance of vigilance in the face of authoritarian excesses, especially in times of crisis or social tension. It also highlights the need for a judicial system to remain impartial and to resist political or popular pressure, especially when it comes to matters of life and death. The fundamental lesson of the Sacco and Vanzetti case, which still resonates today, is that a society that sacrifices its fundamental principles out of fear or prejudice compromises the very values that define it.

The Sacco and Vanzetti affair clearly struck a chord not only in the United States, but internationally too. The arrest, trial and execution of the two men took place against the backdrop of the rise of fascism in Europe, the revival of the workers' movement and the emergence of anti-colonial movements around the world. Their cases took on symbolic importance, embodying the global struggle for social justice, workers' rights and human rights. In the United States, civil rights activists and progressive groups saw the case as a warning against the dangers of blind patriotism, political repression and rampant xenophobia. Protests and demonstrations of support spread to various strata of society, from intellectuals and artists to workers and trade unions. Their voices were raised to denounce what they saw as a grave injustice and a flagrant violation of the defendants' constitutional rights. Internationally, the case took on an even greater dimension. The fact that the Vatican intervened on behalf of Sacco and Vanzetti shows the extent to which their cause had struck a chord not only among radicals and socialists, but also within more conservative institutions. Their case was used both as an example of the flaws in the American system and as a symbol of resistance to oppression. Unfortunately, despite enormous public pressure, the judicial and political institutions of Massachusetts refused to reverse the convictions. The execution of Sacco and Vanzetti in 1927 came as a shock to many, and their deaths reinforced their status as martyrs in the eyes of many supporters around the world.

The Sacco and Vanzetti case is undoubtedly one of the most controversial court cases in American history. From the outset, it was marked by accusations of prejudice and inappropriate conduct on the part of the authorities. The conviction that the two men were the victims of a grave injustice was reinforced by the socio-political context of the time, dominated by the Red Scare and growing animosity towards immigrants, particularly those of Italian origin.

Supporters of Sacco and Vanzetti insisted that the case against them was based mainly on circumstantial evidence and that key elements of the prosecution were either inaccurate or outright fabrications. In addition, they pointed out that both men were known for their radical political views, which could have made them particularly vulnerable to unfair accusation and conviction. The manner in which the trial was conducted, with sometimes contradictory testimony and a blatantly biased judge, reinforced the perception that Sacco and Vanzetti had not received a fair trial. Judge Webster Thayer, who presided over the case, had a well-known aversion to political radicals and reportedly made derogatory comments about the defendants outside the courtroom. The international repercussions of the case were immense. Leading literary, artistic and political figures from around the world, such as Albert Einstein, George Bernard Shaw and H.G. Wells, expressed their outrage at the perceived injustice. Demonstrations took place in cities around the world, from Buenos Aires to Tokyo. The fact that the Sacco and Vanzetti case continues to be debated almost a century later is testament to its enduring relevance. It serves as a powerful reminder of the dangers of xenophobia, political paranoia and the abandonment of basic civil rights in response to societal fears. For many, Sacco and Vanzetti epitomise the injustice that can occur when fear and prejudice override reason and justice.

//Before being executed, Venzetti told Judge Webster Thaye: "Not only have I never committed this crime, but I have never committed any violence in my life, but I am convinced that I am actually being condemned for things of which I am guilty: radicalism and Italianism; and if I could be reborn after my execution I would be radical and Italian again and I would do what I have done with my life and you would execute me a second time for what I have done. Extract from his last words, spoken on 9 April 1927". Vanzetti's statement highlights the prevailing idea that he and Sacco were being tried primarily for their ethnic identity and political beliefs rather than for the crimes of which they were accused. His poignant words underline Vanzetti's deep conviction that he had been unfairly targeted because of his nationality and political beliefs, rather than on the basis of concrete evidence of his guilt. An individual's identity, be it ethnic origin, religion or political beliefs, should never be a reason for persecution or conviction. The Sacco and Vanzetti case is a tragic reminder of this fundamental principle of human rights. Vanzetti's words capture the perceived injustice of their trial and execution, and continue to resonate as a poignant testament to how prejudice can corrupt the justice system.

The Prohibition[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

A police raid in Elk Lake, Ontario, in 1925.

Prohibition was enshrined in law in the 18th Amendment to the US Constitution in 1919 and came into force in January 1920. It was reinforced by the Volstead Act, which defined the types of alcoholic beverages prohibited and the penalties for offences. However, far from eliminating alcohol consumption, Prohibition actually led to an increase in organised crime. Illegal alcohol production and distribution networks, known as speakeasies and bootleggers, proliferated. Emblematic figures of organised crime, such as Al Capone in Chicago, amassed fortunes by controlling the production and sale of alcohol. What's more, the alcohol produced illegally during Prohibition was often dangerous. The lack of regulation meant that contraband alcohol could be contaminated or poorly manufactured, leading to poisoning and death. Over time, public opinion began to turn against Prohibition. Many felt that the experiment had failed to create a sober society and had instead encouraged corruption and crime. The Great Depression also played a role, as the government needed tax revenue and the revival of the legal alcohol industry could help create jobs. As a result, in 1933, the 21st Amendment was passed, repealing the 18th Amendment and ending Prohibition. This allowed the alcohol industry to become legal again, but under strict regulations. Prohibition is often cited as an example of well-intentioned but poorly executed government intervention, with unintended and often negative consequences. It serves as a lesson in the limitations of legislation to change human behaviour and the potential dangers of introducing draconian measures without a thorough assessment of the secondary consequences.

Enforcing prohibition has proved to be an immense challenge. Federal and local authorities often found themselves overwhelmed, unable to manage the scale of the illegal alcohol trade. Clandestine distilleries and secret bars, known as speakeasies, proliferated across the country, and corruption within the police and other public institutions became rife, allowing bootleggers to operate with impunity. Notorious criminal figures such as Al Capone became notorious for their ability to evade justice and accumulate massive wealth through this illegal trade. The smuggling, violence and corruption associated with Prohibition turned some cities, with Chicago as a prominent example, into battlegrounds where rival gangs vied for control of the lucrative alcohol market. As a result, many in society began to question the relevance and effectiveness of prohibition. The costs associated with attempting to enforce the law, the rise of organised crime and the loss of tax revenue from the alcohol industry led to a re-examination of the policy. The adoption of the 21st Amendment in 1933, which repealed the 18th Amendment, marked the official end of Prohibition. This period left a lasting legacy, revealing the difficulties associated with attempting to ban popular substances and highlighting the unforeseen side-effects of a poorly conceived and implemented public policy. It also highlighted the dangers of organised crime and institutional corruption, problems that would continue to haunt the United States long after prohibition ended.

Prohibition in the United States proved to be a costly experiment for the country's economy. With the prohibition of the manufacture and sale of alcohol, not only were breweries, distilleries and bars closed, but all related sectors, such as agriculture, transport and advertising, were also hit hard. Thousands of jobs were lost in these sectors, exacerbating the economic challenges of the time. In addition, the state was deprived of a substantial source of tax revenue. Before Prohibition, alcohol was heavily taxed and represented a reliable source of revenue for the government. With prohibition, these funds evaporated, leaving a hole in the national and state budgets. Prohibition also gave rise to a thriving black market. Demand for alcohol remained high despite prohibition, and organised crime quickly took over to supply it. Infamous figures such as Al Capone emerged, and their criminal empires were built on the smuggling, illegal manufacture and sale of alcohol. It also led to widespread corruption of law enforcement and public officials. Many were prepared to turn a blind eye to illegal activities in exchange for bribes, undermining public confidence in institutions. As a result, while prohibition was initially motivated by a desire to improve public morality and health, its unforeseen side-effects created a distinct set of social and economic problems. The resulting organised crime, corruption and economic hardship eventually led to its repeal in 1933 with the passage of the 21st Amendment, marking the end of one of the most tumultuous periods in American history.

Prohibition is often cited as a period of social experimentation gone awry. In theory, it was intended to improve the morality and health of the nation. In practice, however, it created an environment where crime, corruption and illegality flourished. It was not only a failure of law enforcement, but also had a negative impact on the American economy and society as a whole. The repeal of Prohibition in 1933 with the ratification of the 21st Amendment was an admission of failure. It reflected the recognition that Prohibition had not only failed to eradicate alcoholism and its associated problems, but had actually exacerbated many other social problems. Organised crime had become more powerful than ever, corruption was endemic, and the economy had suffered due to the loss of jobs and tax revenues. The end of Prohibition marked a significant change in American politics and social policy. It symbolised the end of an era of moral experimentation and ushered in a more pragmatic and realistic period in national politics. The lessons learned from Prohibition continue to resonate in modern debates on drug policy and other social issues. This historical episode also offered valuable lessons about the limits of government intervention in people's personal lives and the unintended consequences that can arise when attempts are made to impose moral standards through the law. The years of Prohibition have left an indelible mark on American cultural memory, reminding us of the complexities and challenges inherent in balancing individual liberty, public morality and social welfare.

The road to prohibition was long and complex. The movement to ban alcohol did not emerge overnight. It was the result of years of concerted efforts by various groups, including temperance organisations and religious groups, who all joined forces to make alcohol illegal at national level. They were motivated by a combination of moral, health and social concerns. Many sincerely believed that alcohol was at the root of many of society's problems, from domestic violence to poverty. When Prohibition was introduced, it was hailed by its supporters as a major victory. They believed it would lead to a healthier, more moral and more productive society. However, it soon became clear that the reality was far from these ideal aspirations. Instead of eliminating the problems associated with alcohol consumption, Prohibition created a distinct set of difficulties. Demand for alcohol remained high, and a thriving black market, dominated by criminal organisations, sprang up to meet that demand. Prohibition highlighted a number of fundamental problems. It illustrated the difficulties of enforcing a law that was not widely supported by the public. Many ordinary citizens continued to drink alcohol, while law enforcement agencies and the courts were often reluctant to enforce prohibition laws, either because of their own disagreement with the law or because of corruption. Prohibition also highlighted the limits of efforts to impose morality through the law. It demonstrated that, although legislation can modify and regulate behaviour to a certain extent, it cannot easily change deeply rooted attitudes and beliefs. This was strikingly illustrated by the way in which Prohibition was largely circumvented and ignored, not only by those directly involved in the illegal alcohol trade, but also by ordinary citizens. In 1933, with the ratification of the 21st Amendment, Prohibition was officially repealed. This marked a tacit admission of the failure of the prohibition experiment. It had failed to create a sober nation and had, in fact, exacerbated many of the problems it was intended to solve. The Prohibition years left a profound mark on American society, influencing not only attitudes towards alcohol and its regulation, but also the wider discourse on individual liberty, civil rights and the role of the state in regulating private morality.

Prohibition in the United States ushered in an era of defiance and defiance of the law, giving rise to a climate where clandestinity and corruption flourished. In this chaotic environment, bootlegging and speakeasies took root, turning entire cities into breeding grounds for illicit activities. Chicago, for example, became the scene of the rapid rise of criminal figures, led by Al Capone. His domination of the illegal liquor trade, facilitated by endemic corruption and violent intimidation, became emblematic of the inherent failures of Prohibition. This dark chapter in American history is marked by a cruel irony. A law designed to promote morality and virtue directly fuelled the rise of organised crime, anchoring characters like Capone in popular culture. Law enforcement officers, whose job it was to maintain law and order, were often complicit, either through corruption or impotence, in the clandestine alcohol industry that flourished before their very eyes. Through this prism, Prohibition reveals the dangers inherent in criminalising widely desired substances. It illustrates how well-intentioned policies can backfire spectacularly, creating unintended consequences and exacerbating the very problems they seek to solve. By criminalising alcohol, prohibition not only failed to eradicate alcohol consumption, it also made it dangerous, uncontrolled and lucrative for the criminal world. The repeal of Prohibition in 1933 by the 21st Amendment marked the end of a tumultuous era, but the lessons learned still resonate today. The decades of Prohibition left an indelible scar on the American cultural and political landscape, a vivid reminder of the limits of moral legislation and the dangers inherent in suppressing individual freedoms. Ultimately, prohibition served as a catalyst, prompting society to reconsider the complex intersection between morality, freedom and law, a debate that continues to shape contemporary public discourse.

Christian fundamentalism[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

Grant Wood, American Gothic (1930), Art Institute of Chicago. A symbolic representation of "puritan" America

During the 1920s, Christian fundamentalism in the United States stood as a powerful force of reaction, a pillar against the rapid advance of modern, progressive ideas. It was a time when traditional values were under fire from scientific and cultural progress. The unshakeable belief in a literal interpretation of the Bible collided with an era of scientific and intellectual enlightenment. In this cultural maelstrom, the Scopes Monkey Trial stands as a monument, illustrating the struggle between the proponents of biblical creationism and the supporters of Darwinian evolution. John Scopes, a teacher who dared to plunge into the stormy waters of evolution in a public classroom, was the target of public and legal vindictiveness. This was not just an attack on one man, but symbolised an assault on the advent of a new era, one in which science, logic and reason threatened to dismantle centuries of established religious dogma. The courtroom where Scopes was tried was more than a place of trial; it was the arena where two Americas clashed. On the one hand, the fundamentalists, firm in their faith and determined to preserve a way of life shaped by strict adherence to the Scriptures. On the other, those who looked to the horizon of a future enlightened by science, a world where truths were not dictated by dogma but discovered through investigation, experimentation and reflection. Although Scopes was found guilty, and the strict letter of Tennessee law upheld, the trial was a catalyst for a cultural tidal shift. The fundamentalists, while winning the legal battle, began to lose the cultural war. The divide revealed during the trial resonates to this day, foreshadowing contemporary battles between science and religion, faith and reason. In this way, the 1920s, although a long time ago, offer a mirror in which contemporary society can be seen reflected. The issues raised and the battles fought during that turbulent decade live on, transforming and reinventing themselves in the context of each new generation. The Scopes story, and by extension the challenge of Christian fundamentalism in that era, remains a vibrant, relevant and inspiring chapter in American history.

Jehovah's Witnesses rose from the ashes of the Bible Student movement in the late nineteenth century to become a distinctive and sometimes controversial voice on the American religious scene. Their preaching, vibrant with ardent fervour and a passion for evangelism, resonated in the remote corners of American towns and villages. Their method of evangelism, a door-to-door witness, though unconventional, resonated in the hearts of those seeking a different and direct spirituality. However, this direct and unequivocal approach to proselytism was not without consequences. They often encountered resistance, even hostility, from government institutions and established churches. Their literal interpretation of the Bible, their reluctance to participate in civic affairs, including military service, and their disdain for pagan celebrations, including birthdays and Christmas, made them strangers in their own country. Nevertheless, there was something in the simplicity of their faith, their endurance in the face of persecution, that attracted the attention of those living on the margins. In the rural corners of the United States, where religious traditions were deeply rooted but often unchallenged, the message of Jehovah's Witnesses found fertile ground. They offered an alternative, a path of faith that promised not only religious freedom but also a form of social justice - a respite from the inequalities and injustices of everyday life. The growth of Jehovah's Witnesses during the 1920s and 1930s can be attributed to a convergence of socio-economic and religious factors. It was a time of great change, economic crisis and questioning of social norms. People were looking for answers, and for many, Jehovah's Witnesses offered a clear and unshakeable answer in an uncertain world. The strength of their faith, the clarity of their message and their unwavering commitment to preach, despite opposition, shaped the identity of Jehovah's Witnesses. Every persecution was seen not as an obstacle but as a validation of their faith, a sign that their message was not only urgent but divinely ordained. In the complex and often contradictory tapestry of American religious life in the early twentieth century, Jehovah's Witnesses carved out a distinctive niche for themselves, a legacy that endures to this day.

The 1920s, a decade of transformation for American society[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

The rise of the second industrial revolution marked an era of prosperity and radical transformation in American society and the economy. The rapid deployment of emerging technologies, including electricity, communications and transportation, triggered an unprecedented industrial boom. The expansion of manufacturing industries opened up employment opportunities, fuelling the economic rise of the middle and upper classes. The American dream seemed within reach for a wider section of the population. This prosperity, however, was far from universal. As cities grew into buzzing metropolises and wealth concentrated in the hands of industrial tycoons, a large section of the population remained outside the golden circle of prosperity. Small farmers, unskilled workers and ethnic minorities faced a reality of growing socio-economic inequality. Economic optimism fuelled unshakeable confidence in free market forces. The government, imbued with the ideology of economic liberalism, was committed to policies of non-intervention. Taxes were low, regulation minimal and the economy was left to the mercy of market forces. The result was an era of unbridled capitalism, where corporations flourished and inequality deepened. The wealth and opulence of the upper and middle classes was ostentatiously displayed. Consumption became not only a way of life, but also a status symbol. The accessibility of consumer goods, amplified by mass production, created a consumer culture in which material possession was equated with social success. However, this era of opulence and prosperity was not destined to last forever. The very foundations on which this prosperity was built - unbridled economic liberalism, excessive reliance on market forces and rampant socio-economic inequality - were unstable. The economic house of cards, built on speculation and excessive debt, was vulnerable, paving the way for the stock market crash of 1929 and the Great Depression that was to shake the foundations of American society and the economy.

It was against this contrasting backdrop of economic prosperity and protectionist policies that the daily lives of Americans in the 1920s unfolded. Protectionist policies cut both ways. On the one hand, it stimulated domestic industry, boosted employment and ensured rapid economic growth. On the other hand, it led to a concentration of economic power in the hands of a few oligopolies, exacerbating socio-economic inequalities. The economic boom propelled living standards to unprecedented heights for the majority of Americans. Mass production and consumption were the driving forces behind this growth. Protectionist policies favoured domestic industries, which in turn generated jobs and an abundance of goods. The increased availability of affordable products widens access to goods previously considered luxuries. This leads to a society where consumption is a norm and a sign of success. But this idyllic picture of prosperity and abundance masks a more complex reality. The protection of national industries and the concentration of economic power are eroding the strength of small businesses. Oligopolies dominate, eclipsing the artisan and the small entrepreneur. The culture of local, personalised business is fading, giving way to an impersonal, homogenised market economy. Protectionism, while beneficial to overall national growth, has a social cost. Communities that depended on small businesses for their vitality and uniqueness are seeing their social fabric transformed. The closeness and personal touch that characterised trade and business are giving way to the anonymity of big business. The decline of craft and small businesses is having an impact on the identity and cohesion of communities. The direct relationship between shopkeeper and customer, once based on trust and familiarity, is being lost in the mechanisation and standardisation of production and sales. Town centres and local markets, once lively and diverse, are being transformed under the pressure of department stores and national chains.

Income inequality was entrenched and exacerbated during the economic boom of the 1920s. As the nation witnessed a meteoric industrial and economic rise, the fruits of this growth were not evenly shared among the population. A considerable concentration of wealth in the hands of the wealthy elite was palpable, driving a clear wedge between the economic classes. The economic elite, taking advantage of industrial and commercial opportunities, reaped astronomical profits. Stock market growth, industrial expansion and general economic prosperity consolidated the wealth and economic power of the better-off. At the same time, the middle and lower classes, although benefiting from increased employment and the availability of consumer goods, did not experience a proportional increase in their incomes. For a time, the rapid rise of industry and consumption masked the growing imbalance in wealth. The economic gains of the upper classes were highlighted, offering an illusion of universal prosperity. However, the contrast between the opulence of the rich and the modest living conditions of the majority of the population became increasingly apparent. The economic divide helped to create a breeding ground for instability. When the stock market collapsed in 1929, ushering in the Great Depression, income inequality came to the fore. The middle and lower classes, whose economic resources were already limited, were hit hard by the economic shock. The vulnerability of low-income households, combined with the collapse of financial markets and the economic contraction, revealed the flaws inherent in a prosperity that was not inclusive. The Great Depression was not only the product of unbridled speculation and insufficient regulation; it also reflected a society where wealth and opportunity were not equitably distributed. These structural inequalities, which came to the fore during the economic crisis, gave rise to a profound reflection on the nature of capitalism and the American economic system. The need for a balance between economic freedom, regulation and social justice became a central theme in the political and economic debates of the following decades. Thus, the prosperity of the 1920s and the abyss of the Great Depression together shaped an era of reform and redefinition of the American social and economic contract.

The economic climate of the 1920s in the United States was characterised by exuberant optimism, fuelled largely by laissez-faire policies and low levels of government regulation. This provided fertile ground for unbridled speculation and risky investments. The stock market became the symbol of the nation's apparent prosperity, with shares seeming to know no bounds in their dizzying ascent. The government, under the influence of a liberal economic ideology, had largely withdrawn its hand from the market. Protectionism, aimed at protecting domestic industries from foreign competition, also contributed to an atmosphere of false economic security. High tariff barriers and restrictions on imports created an apparently robust, but also isolated and unsustainable, domestic market. Beneath the surface of this prosperity, however, significant cracks began to appear. Income inequality was pronounced; the working class, while productive, did not share equally in the fruits of economic growth. Their purchasing power stagnated, and their capacity to consume did not keep pace with production. The stock market, largely unregulated, became a playground for speculation. The lack of adequate supervision and regulation allowed risky and often reckless investment practices to proliferate. Easy money and quick gains were the order of the day, fuelling a financial bubble that was ready to burst. When the stock market crash of 1929 struck, it not only revealed the instability of the stock market, but also highlighted the structural weaknesses of the American economy. Speculation, easy credit and excessive debt combined with growing income inequality and a lack of regulation to create a perfect storm of economic instability. The Great Depression that followed was a brutal manifestation of the limits of laissez-faire and protectionism in the absence of adequate regulation and supervision. It underlined the need for a delicate balance between market freedom, government regulation and social justice, a balance that would be at the heart of economic and political debates for decades to come.

The initial government response to the Great Depression was limited and often considered inadequate to deal with the scale and depth of the economic crisis. Early interventions were rooted in a laissez-faire philosophy, with a strong belief that the market would correct itself and that government intervention should be minimised. The administration of President Herbert Hoover, which was in office during the stock market crash of 1929, was criticised for its apparently timid and ineffective response to the crisis. Although Hoover did not completely ignore the Depression, his efforts to combat it were often indirect and insufficient. The President believed in individual responsibility and was wary of direct government intervention in the economy. However, the rapidly worsening economic crisis, characterised by soaring unemployment rates, pervasive misery and growing despair, increased the pressure for more decisive action. The election of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932 marked a major turning point in the American government's approach to economic management and crisis intervention. With Roosevelt's New Deal, the federal government took an active and direct role in revitalising the economy. A range of legislation and programmes were put in place to provide immediate relief to those who were suffering, to stimulate economic recovery and to implement reforms to prevent a recurrence of such a crisis. Programmes such as Social Security, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and others came into being during this period, marking a significant increase in the scope and role of the federal government in the economy and society. Nevertheless, despite these unprecedented interventions, the full recovery of the American economy was gradual and was stimulated not only by the policies of the New Deal but also by the increase in production and employment resulting from the Second World War. The war acted as a catalyst to pull the economy out of depression, providing jobs and stimulating production on a massive scale.

Annexes[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

References[modifier | modifier le wikicode]

  1. Aline Helg - UNIGE
  2. Aline Helg -
  3. Aline Helg - Wikipedia
  4. Aline Helg -
  5. Aline Helg -
  6. Aline Helg -
  7. Aline Helg - Google Scholar
  8. based on data in Susan Carter, ed. Historical Statistics of the US: Millennial Edition (2006) series Ca9