法律的适用

根据维克多-莫尼埃的课程改编

Languages

Deutsch English Español Français Italiano

Português

法律入门

法律入门：关键概念和定义 ● 国家：职能、结构和政治制度 ● 法律的不同部门 ● 法律渊源 ● 法律的主要形成传统 ● 法律关系的要素 ● 法律的适用 ● 法律的实施 ● 瑞士从起源到20世纪的发展 ● 瑞士的国内法律框架 ● 瑞士的国家结构、政治制度和中立 ● 19世纪末至20世纪中叶国际关系的演变 ● 世界组织 ● 欧洲组织及其与瑞士的关系 ● 基本权利的类别和世代 ● 基本权利的起源 ● 十八世纪末的权利宣言 ● 二十世纪基本权利普遍概念的构建

法律是由法律规则构成的，而现实则是由实际情况构成的。法律规则包括构成法律框架的法律、法规和法律原则。这些规则旨在指导和规范社会中个人和组织的行为。另一方面，"实际情况 "指的是日常生活中出现的真实、具体和实际的情况。这些情况可能千差万别，并不总能简单或直接地解释现行法律。

因此，适用法律涉及解释和调整法律规则，使其适用于具体的实际情况。这往往需要法律判断力来平衡法律条文与每个案件的实际、社会和人文现实。法官、律师和其他法律专业人员在这一过程中发挥着至关重要的作用，确保司法公正并符合既定的法律原则。

三段论

法律三段论或归纳三段论是法律推理的基本方法，可将法律规则应用于实际情况。这一思维过程分为几个阶段。首先，需要确定相关的法律规则。该规则通常源自成文法、法规、法律原则或判例法，它确立了适用于各种情况的一般性命题。接下来，这一过程需要对相关情况的具体事实进行仔细分析。这一阶段至关重要，因为它涉及对实际情况的详细而准确的了解。例如，在合同纠纷中，事实可能包括合同条款、相关各方的行为以及达成协议的背景。最后一个阶段是归入，即事实归入法律规则。这一阶段决定了一般规则如何适用于案件的特定情况。例如，如果法律规定，未经所有相关方同意，合同无效，而事实证明，其中一方未给予知情同意，则法官可认定合同无效。

因此，法律大纲不仅仅是一种智力练习；它还是一种重要的工具，可确保法律裁决符合逻辑、前后一致并符合法律标准。这种方法不仅能确保法律规则得到正确应用，还有助于维护司法的可预见性和公正性。

法律的长期适用

法律的适用性取决于其生效和持续有效性。法律一旦通过立法程序，就不能立即适用。它在法律文本本身规定的日期或其他法规确定的日期生效。这一时期允许个人和机构为遵守新法律做好准备。另一方面，废止问题对于确定法律的适用性也至关重要。一项法律在被明确废除或被新法律取代之前一直有效。废止可以是全部废止，即整部法律都不适用；也可以是部分废止，即只有法律的某些部分被废除。在某些法律体系中，还有过时的概念，即如果一项法律没有被使用或被认为过时，它就可能变得不适用。即使一项法律已被废除，某些过渡性条款也可能适用。这些条款旨在管理从旧法规到新法规的过渡，并处理旧法律下存在的法律情况。因此，生效和废除是决定法律如何以及何时适用的关键程序，可确保法律框架的稳定性和可预测性。

在两院制立法体系中，有两个独立的议院（通常是下院和上院），法律的通过需要两院的批准。通过立法的过程涉及几个关键阶段。首先，通常由政府或议会成员提出法案。然后，在其中一个议院对该法案进行辩论和审查，并可能对其进行修改。经过第一阶段的辩论和批准后，法案进入另一议院。再次进行辩论，并可能做出进一步修正。一项法律要想获得通过，其最终形式必须得到参众两院的认可。这往往意味着参众两院之间的来回过程，尤其是当一院做出的修改需要另一院进一步批准时。这一过程可确保对法案进行仔细审查和平衡考虑。一旦参众两院批准了相同版本的文本，法案即被视为通过。根据具体的政治体制，下一步可能是国家元首（如总统或君主）的批准或核准，之后法案即成为法律，并可在指定日期或根据法律本身的规定生效。这种两院制的通过程序旨在确保立法过程中的全面审查和多元化代表，反映社会中的不同利益和观点。

在瑞士的立法体系中，法律的颁布是法律通过后的一个重要过程。这一阶段标志着从法案过渡到官方认可和适用的法律。瑞士法律制定过程的特点是融入了直接民主，体现了国家的基本民主原则。一方面，当涉及宪法修正案或必须进行全民公决的法律等重要法律时，颁布要遵循特定的程序。在瑞士人民通过全民公决批准一项法律提案后，联邦委员会作为执行机构正式确认全民公决的结果。例如，在瑞士人民直接参与决策的宪法修正案中，就会出现这种情况。联邦委员会的确认标志着法律的颁布，表明该法律已准备就绪，可以付诸实施。另一方面，对于不需要全民公决的普通法律，则在全民公决期限到期后颁布。在此期间，公民有机会通过收集足够的签名要求全民公决来对法律提出质疑。如果在截止日期前没有公民投票的要求，作为中央行政机构的联邦总理府将正式颁布法律。这一阶段确认法律是按照民主程序通过的，而且在生效方面没有重大法律障碍。因此，瑞士的法律颁布体现了代议制民主和直接民主的独特结合，确保法律不仅由选举产生的代表通过，而且在某些情况下直接由人民批准。这种方式增强了法律的合法性和可接受性，确保瑞士的法律框架与公民的意愿保持一致。

在《官方汇编》上公布法律是立法过程中的一个重要步骤，尤其是在瑞士的法律体系中。公布法律的主要目的是使人人都能查阅和了解法律，这也是法律的一项基本原则：法律要想适用，就必须向公众开放，并为受其影响的人们所知晓。官方汇编》作为按时间顺序排列的出版物，按颁布的先后顺序收录了法律文本。该出版物不仅向公众传播立法信息，还可作为法律专业人士、政府机构和公民的官方参考资料。官方汇编》的出版保证了立法过程的透明度，使社会所有参与者都能关注法律框架的发展。通过使法律易于查阅，《官方汇编》有助于确保公民和法律实体了解其权利和义务。这对合法性原则至关重要，该原则规定任何人都不得无视法律。因此，法律的官方出版物在维护法律秩序、促进社会公正和可预测性方面发挥着重要作用。

瑞士法律体系中有两种官方出版物在传播和组织联邦法律方面发挥着至关重要的作用：《官方汇编》（OR）和《系统汇编》（SC）。这两部汇编具有不同的特点和目标，反映了查阅和分析法律的不同方式。正式汇编》简称 RO，是按时间顺序排列的出版物。它按照颁布的顺序汇集法律文本。这意味着法律、法令和其他法律文本是按照其生效的顺序出版的。这种按时间顺序排列的方法对于跟踪立法发展和了解法律通过的历史背景特别有用。因此，对于对立法史和立法变化顺序感兴趣的法律专业人士和研究人员来说，《RO》是必不可少的。Recueil systématique 的缩写为 RS，按主题编排。RS 不按时间顺序排列，而是按主题领域或主题（如家庭法、商法或刑法）对法律文本进行分组。这种按主题编排的方式使寻求特定主题具体信息的人更容易找到和查阅法律文本。因此，对于法律从业人员、学生和任何需要快速有效地查阅特定领域相关法律的人来说，《汇编》是一个非常有价值的工具。这两本书分别从不同角度全面介绍了瑞士联邦法律。RO》提供了历史和顺序的概览，而《RS》则提供了有组织和专题的视角。它们共同确保从法律专业人士到普通公民的广大用户都能查阅、理解和使用瑞士联邦法律。

瑞士联邦公报》在法律出版系统中发挥着独特而互补的作用。作为一份以瑞士三种官方语言（德语、法语和意大利语）出版的周刊，其主要目的是提供有关立法和政府活动的最新信息。与侧重于公布已颁布法律的《官方汇编》不同，《联邦公报》侧重于立法过程的初期和中期阶段。它提供有关议会通过的新法律的信息，重点是全民公决的最后期限。这在瑞士的民主制度中至关重要，因为公民有机会要求就最近通过的法律进行全民公决。在《联邦公报》上公布后，全民公决的最后期限就开始了。除了向公众和利益相关者通报全民公决的最后期限，《联邦公报》也是向议员和公众通报当前法案和立法辩论的一种沟通手段。它可能包括报告、新闻稿、政府公告以及与立法进程相关的其他信息。因此，《联邦公报》是瑞士政府透明度和民主参与的重要工具。它使公民和议员能够及时了解立法动态，并通过确保广泛提供和获取必要的信息，为行使全民公决等民主权利提供便利。

法律的生效和废除

法律生效

The entry into force of a law is the point at which it becomes binding and applicable. In the Swiss legal system, the process by which a law comes into force is generally defined either by the legislative text itself or by a decision of the Federal Council. When a law is passed by Parliament, it may specify directly in its text the date on which it will come into force. This is common practice for laws whose application requires advance preparation, allowing individuals, businesses and government bodies to adapt to new legal requirements. In cases where the law does not explicitly state when it will come into force, the Federal Council, the executive body of the Swiss federal government, is responsible for setting the date. The Federal Council takes this decision taking into account various factors, such as the need to allow sufficient time for implementation, the practical implications of the law, and coordination with other legislation or policies in force. The entry into force of a law is an important milestone, as it is at this point that the legal provisions become binding and the legal consequences of non-compliance apply. This underlines the importance of communicating and publishing laws, such as through the Federal Gazette and the Official Compendium, to ensure that all stakeholders are informed and ready to comply with new regulations. By setting the date of entry into force, the Federal Council plays a key role in ensuring a smooth transition to the application of the new legal standards.

The process of creating and applying a law in legal systems such as Switzerland's is a structured and meticulous one, beginning with the adoption of the law by Parliament. This first phase sees a bill debated and amended by elected representatives in a bicameral context, where two chambers scrutinise the content and relevance of the proposed legislation. A concrete example might be the adoption of a new environmental law, where Parliament discusses its implications and adjusts its provisions to address environmental and economic concerns. Once Parliament has adopted the law, it is promulgated. This formal step, often carried out by the Federal Council in Switzerland, is an official recognition of the law. Promulgation is a signal that the law has met all the necessary criteria and is ready to be communicated to the public. For example, a law enacted on road safety would be officially announced, indicating its importance and imminent validity. Publication follows enactment. The law is made available in an official compendium, enabling all citizens and interested parties to become acquainted with it. Publication ensures that the law is transparent and accessible, as in the case of new tax regulations, where the precise details and implications for citizens and businesses must be clearly communicated. Finally, entry into force is the stage at which the law becomes applicable. The date of application may be specified in the text of the law or determined by the Federal Council. This stage marks the point at which the provisions of the law must be respected and followed. Take the example of a new data protection law: once it has come into force, companies and organisations must comply with the new standards for managing personal data. This process, from adoption to entry into force, ensures that each law is carefully examined, validated and communicated, reflecting democratic and legal principles, while guaranteeing that citizens are well informed and prepared for future legislative changes.

Repeal of the law

Repeal, in the legal context, is a process by which a legislative act is annulled or suppressed by a new act of the same or higher rank. The act may be repealed in its entirety or only in part. Once repealed, the legislative act ceases to produce legal effects, which means that it is no longer applicable and can no longer be invoked in judicial decisions or legal transactions.

This concept of repeal is fundamental in law and is encapsulated in the Latin adage "Lex posterior derogat priori", which translates as "the later law derogates from the earlier law". This means that in the event of a conflict between two laws, the more recent law generally prevails over the earlier law. This adage is a key principle of the hierarchy of norms in law, ensuring that the legal system remains coherent and up to date. A concrete example of repeal might be the introduction of new privacy legislation that replaces and overrides an earlier law on the same subject. The new law, once enacted and in force, would render the previous law obsolete and inapplicable.

Repeal is an important tool for legislators, ensuring that the body of law remains adapted to changes in society, technological change and new ethical and moral standards. It also makes it possible to repeal laws that have become redundant or have been deemed inappropriate or ineffective. In short, repeal is essential to maintain a dynamic and responsive legal system, capable of responding to the changing needs of society.

The principle of non-retroactivity of the law

The principle you describe is closely linked to the notion of non-retroactivity of laws, a fundamental concept in law. According to this principle, a new legal norm must not retroactively affect situations that arose under the aegis of a previous rule. This means that a law cannot be applied to situations, acts or facts that occurred before it came into force.

This principle of non-retroactivity is rooted in the declarations of fundamental rights dating back to the 18th century. An emblematic example is Article 9 of the Virginia Declaration of Rights of 12 June 1776, as well as Article 8 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 26 August 1789. These fundamental texts, which stemmed from the beginnings of the modern era of human rights, laid the foundations for legal protection against the retroactivity of laws, particularly in the criminal field. Article 8 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, adopted at the time of the French Revolution, clearly states that only necessary penalties can be established and that a person can only be punished under a law that was in force at the time the act was committed. This provision is intended to ensure fair justice and protect citizens against the arbitrary application of the law. Similarly, Article 9 of the Virginia Declaration of Rights, a precursor to the American Constitution, reflects these same values of justice and legal predictability. These principles were revolutionary at the time and have greatly influenced the development of modern legal systems. The principle of non-retroactivity, as formulated in these historic documents, is a pillar of the rule of law. It ensures that individuals are not subject to laws that did not exist at the time of their actions, thereby providing protection against ex post facto legal changes that could alter the legal consequences of their actions. This principle strengthens confidence in the legal system, as it assures citizens that laws will not be applied arbitrarily or unfairly.

This principle is essential to guarantee legal certainty and the predictability of the law. It protects individuals against the retroactive application of legislative changes, particularly in cases where such application could be prejudicial or unfair. In practice, this ensures that individuals cannot be held liable under a law that did not exist at the time the action or event occurred. The non-retroactivity of laws is a pillar of justice and fairness, ensuring that individuals are not penalised by unpredictable and sudden legislative changes. This principle helps to maintain confidence in the legal system and to protect the fundamental rights of individuals.

Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du Citoyen du 26 aout 1789 - Article 8

Article 2 of the Swiss Criminal Code is a perfect example of how to implement the principle of non-retroactivity of laws, while incorporating an important exception in favour of the accused. This article sets out the rules for applying the Code in terms of temporality and jurisdiction.

Code pénal suisse - article 2

The first part of the article stipulates that anyone who commits a felony or misdemeanour after the entry into force of the Penal Code shall be judged in accordance with its provisions. This directly reflects the principle of non-retroactivity, stating that actions are assessed according to the law in force at the time they were committed. This ensures that individuals will not be judged according to laws that did not exist at the time of their actions, thus ensuring a fair and predictable application of the law. The second part of the article introduces a notable exception to the principle of non-retroactivity, known as "milder criminal law". Under this provision, if a crime or misdemeanour was committed before the entry into force of the Criminal Code but the perpetrator is not brought to trial until after that date, and the provisions of the new Code are more favourable to the accused than the previous law, then the new Code applies. This exception is an example of the tendency of legal systems to favour interpretations and laws that benefit the accused, an approach that reflects the principle of the presumption of innocence and the desire to avoid unjustly harsh penalties. Article 2 of the Swiss Criminal Code illustrates the complexity and nuance of the principle of non-retroactivity, balancing the need for predictable justice with the principles of fairness and equity for the accused.

There is an important nuance in the application of the principle of non-retroactivity in criminal law, particularly in relation to the doctrine of 'milder criminal law'. This doctrine constitutes a notable exception to the general rule of non-retroactivity, as you mentioned in the context of Article 2 of the Swiss Criminal Code. According to this doctrine, if a new criminal law is more lenient or more favourable to the accused than the old law in force at the time the offence was committed, the new law can be applied retroactively. This exception is based on the principle of fair justice and aims to ensure that the accused benefits from the most lenient legislation possible. This approach reflects an orientation towards protecting the rights of the accused in the legal system. It is based on the idea that justice must not only be fair and predictable, but also adapted to avoid excessively harsh punishments. In practice, this means that if a law is changed between the time of the offence and the time of sentencing, and this change is advantageous to the accused, the change must be applied. This derogation from non-retroactivity demonstrates the adaptability and sensitivity of criminal law to the fundamental principles of human rights. It is essential to maintain a balance between the strict application of the law and the need for justice to take account of changing circumstances and evolving social and legal norms.

Convention européenne des droits de l’Homme - article 7

Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights embodies a key principle in criminal law, that of the legality of offences and penalties. This principle states that no one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. This provision plays a crucial role in protecting individual rights and preserving fair justice. This principle ensures that laws are formulated in a clear and accessible way, enabling citizens to understand the legal consequences of their actions. For example, if an individual commits an act that is not defined as a crime at the time of its commission, they cannot be retroactively prosecuted if that act is subsequently criminalised. This approach protects citizens from arbitrary or unpredictable changes in the law, ensuring that no one is penalised for acts that were not illegal at the time they were carried out.

Article 7 also reflects the commitment of democratic systems to the non-retroactivity of criminal laws. It prevents governments from applying new criminal laws to past actions, a practice that would not only be unjust but also contrary to fundamental principles of justice. This protection against the retroactive application of criminal laws is essential for public confidence in the legal system and for the foreseeability of the law. Finally, this provision of the European Convention on Human Rights serves as a safeguard against the abuse of legislative power. It prevents states from punishing individuals for behaviour that was not considered criminal at the time it was committed, thereby protecting citizens against arbitrariness and abuse of power. Article 7 not only guarantees the clarity and precision of criminal laws; it is also a pillar of the protection of fundamental rights, ensuring that justice is administered in a fair and predictable manner.

Transitional provisions

Transitional law, often embodied in transitional provisions in legislation, plays a crucial role in the process of legislative change. These provisions are special rules of law, designed to be temporary and to facilitate the transition from old to new legislation. They take account of the need for individuals, businesses and government institutions to adjust and adapt to changes in legislation. These transitional provisions serve several essential purposes. Firstly, they provide a period for adaptation, allowing the parties concerned to gradually comply with the new requirements without major disruption. For example, if a new law imposes stricter environmental standards, transitional provisions could give companies time to comply with the new regulations, thus avoiding abrupt or destabilising economic consequences.

Secondly, transitional provisions help to avoid or mitigate retroactive legal effects. They may, for example, specify that certain parts of the new law will not apply to situations already in progress on the date it comes into force. This can be crucial in areas such as tax or contract law, where parties need clarity about how new laws affect existing agreements or past tax obligations. In addition, transitional law can also be used to clarify situations where the provisions of old and new legislation might conflict, by establishing guidelines as to which law applies in specific circumstances. In this way, transitional law is an important tool for ensuring a smooth legislative transition. It helps to preserve legal stability and to ensure that legislative changes are implemented fairly and effectively, without unforeseen or disproportionate consequences.

The application of law in space

The application of law in space, often referred to as private international law or conflict of laws, is a complex area that deals with how laws are applied in situations involving foreign or cross-border elements. This area of law is becoming particularly relevant in an increasingly globalised world, where individuals, goods, services and capital easily cross national borders. The fundamental principle of private international law is to determine which jurisdiction has jurisdiction and which national law is applicable in cases involving several legal systems. For example, if a contract is signed in one country but is to be performed in another, private international law helps to resolve questions such as: which country has jurisdiction to hear the dispute? Which national law should be applied to govern the contract?

To resolve these questions, lawyers rely on rules and principles to determine the applicable law. These rules include, but are not limited to, the law of the place where the contract was signed (lex loci contractus), the law of the place where the obligation is to be performed (lex loci solutionis) or the law of the place with which the case has the closest connection. In addition to national legislation, international conventions and treaties also play an important role in the application of the law in space. For example, the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction establishes procedures for the return of children abducted abroad. Applying the law across borders therefore requires a thorough understanding not only of national laws but also of international rules and conflict-of-law principles, thus ensuring that cross-border cases are handled fairly and consistently.

Principle of the territoriality of law

The principle of the territoriality of law is a cornerstone of international law, affirming that a state's legislation is applicable only within its territorial borders. This concept underlines the sovereignty of each State to establish and enforce its own laws, thus recognising the autonomy and independence of nations in the management of their internal affairs. According to this principle, an individual or entity is subject to the laws of the country in which it is located. For example, an Italian citizen, when in Italy, is governed by Italian laws, but when travelling to Spain, becomes subject to Spanish laws. This rule is essential for legal coherence and predictability, ensuring that individuals know the laws to which they are subject and that states maintain their legislative authority within their territory.

However, the territoriality of the law is not without its complexities and exceptions. In the field of international criminal law, for example, certain serious crimes such as war crimes and genocide can be prosecuted under the principle of universal jurisdiction, which allows a State to try such crimes regardless of where they were committed. This exception reflects an international recognition that certain acts are so damaging to world order that they cannot be limited by territorial borders. In addition, with the advent of digital technology and economic globalisation, certain laws, particularly those relating to cyber security, intellectual property and financial regulations, may have extraterritorial implications. For example, data protection laws, such as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), can affect companies located outside the EU if they process data from EU citizens.

The principle of territoriality of law, which states that any person or thing located in a country is governed by the law of that country, is a fundamental concept in international law. This principle reinforces the idea that each State has sovereignty over its territory, enabling it to exercise legislative authority over the persons, goods and activities located there. This implies that national laws are the primary norms governing conduct and relationships within a state's borders. However, there are notable exceptions to this principle, especially in the area of public law, where the exercise of public power is concerned. One of the most significant exceptions is that relating to diplomats. Foreign diplomats and the staff of diplomatic missions enjoy a special status under international public law, in particular in accordance with the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

Under this convention, diplomats are granted immunity from the criminal, civil and administrative jurisdiction of the host country. This means that they are not subject to the same laws as ordinary citizens or residents of the host country. For example, a diplomat accredited in France is exempt from French jurisdiction for most acts performed in the exercise of his or her official duties. This immunity is intended to ensure that diplomats can carry out their duties without fear of interference or persecution from the host country, thereby facilitating international relations and communication between states. This exception for diplomats illustrates how the principles of public international law can prevail over the principle of territoriality of law. It underlines the need to balance national sovereignty with the requirements of the harmonious functioning of international relations.

Principle of the extraterritoriality of foreign diplomats

The principle of extraterritoriality of foreign diplomats is a key concept in international law, playing a vital role in maintaining effective and harmonious diplomatic relations between nations. According to this principle, although diplomats and embassies are physically located in a host country, they are not subject to the jurisdiction of that country, but rather to that of their own State. This rule is fundamental to ensuring the independence and security of diplomatic missions. Diplomatic immunity, which is an application of this principle, offers diplomats protection from prosecution in the host country. This immunity extends to both criminal and civil proceedings, ensuring that diplomats can carry out their duties without fear of interference. For example, if a diplomat commits a traffic offence in the host country, he or she cannot be subject to the same legal proceedings as local citizens.

Extraterritoriality also confers on embassy premises a kind of "sovereign territory" of the State they represent. This means that embassy premises cannot be searched or seized by the host country's authorities without the embassy's consent, providing a safe haven for diplomats and allowing them to conduct sensitive business without outside interference. It is important to note that, although diplomats benefit from extraterritoriality, they are still obliged to respect the laws of their own country. They are also encouraged to respect the laws and regulations of the host country, in accordance with the principles of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. This convention establishes the international standards governing diplomatic activities and aims to promote international cooperation within a respectful and secure framework. This approach to extraterritoriality is crucial to the functioning of international relations. It ensures that diplomats can carry out their official duties effectively, while maintaining mutual respect and sovereignty between countries. By balancing the needs of national sovereignty and international cooperation, the principle of exterritoriality contributes significantly to the stability and effectiveness of diplomatic relations around the world.

The principle of exterritoriality is effectively applied in the context of aviation, where an aircraft is considered to be an extension of the territory of the State whose flag it flies. This means that, even when an aircraft is in international flight or on the territory of another country, it is subject to the laws and jurisdiction of the State under which it is registered. This concept is an extension of national sovereignty over airspace and is essential for the regulation and management of international air traffic. When an aircraft registered in a particular country crosses international airspace or lands in another country, the laws of the aircraft's country of origin continue to apply on board. For example, if an incident occurs on board an aircraft registered in France, whether in international airspace or on the ground of another country, it is generally dealt with under French law. This principle ensures a certain consistency and uniformity in the application of laws on board aircraft, which is crucial given the international nature of air transport. However, this rule is subject to certain limitations and exceptions. In particular circumstances, such as serious crimes committed on board or situations that threaten the safety of the country where the aircraft lands, local authorities may intervene and apply their own legislation. In addition, international agreements such as the 1963 Tokyo Convention and the 1971 Montreal Convention lay down specific rules concerning the jurisdictions and laws applicable on board aircraft.

The interpretation of law

Interpreting legal rules is a complex and nuanced intellectual process, essential for determining and clarifying the true meaning of legislative and regulatory texts. This practice is essential in the legal field, as laws are not always explicit or exhaustive in their wording, leaving room for diverse interpretations.

There are several approaches to legal interpretation. One common method is literal interpretation, where the focus is on the ordinary meaning of the words used in the law. For example, if a law prohibits "driving at high speed", the literal interpretation will seek to define what exactly "high speed" means on the basis of ordinary language. However, literal interpretation may not always be sufficient or appropriate. Consequently, lawyers often turn to teleological interpretation, which seeks to understand the purpose or intention behind the law. For example, in the case of environmental legislation, teleological interpretation considers the overall objective of protecting the environment to guide the application of the law.

Systematic interpretation is another important method, which examines the law in the context of the overall legal system. This involves considering how a specific law fits with other laws or with established legal principles. In addition, historical interpretation can be used, particularly in complex cases. This approach takes into account the historical circumstances and legislative debates that preceded the adoption of the law, thus providing insight into the intentions of the legislators. Judges play a crucial role in interpreting legislation, particularly when faced with cases where the law must be applied to specific and sometimes novel situations. Their interpretation has a direct impact on the application of justice, illustrating the vital importance of this practice in maintaining legal order and achieving fair justice in society.

The reality of the application of the law in the life of society effectively highlights the rarity of situations where the law perfectly coincides with the facts. This observation highlights the constant need to interpret the rules of law. Despite their careful wording, legislative texts cannot anticipate all the nuances and complexities of real-life situations. The facts of life in society are extremely diverse, and each case may present unique particularities that are not explicitly covered by existing laws. This diversity of situations makes interpretation not only inevitable, but also essential to ensure that the law is applied fairly and effectively. For example, in the context of a contractual dispute, the terms of a contract may seem clear, but their application to a specific case may require extensive interpretation to understand the intentions of the parties and the context in which the agreement was made. Interpretation also becomes crucial when a law is vague or general in its wording. In interpreting the law, judges seek to give it a meaning that is both faithful to the intention of the legislature and adapted to the particular circumstances of the case in question. This task of interpretation requires a thorough understanding not only of the law itself, but also of wider legal principles and the social and historical context. Ultimately, interpretation is an indispensable component of the legal system, bridging the gap between the letter of the law and the complex and changing reality of life in society. It ensures that the law remains relevant, fair and adapted to the diverse needs and challenges of society.

Interpreting the law is a complex task that involves a variety of players, each bringing a specific perspective and expertise. At the heart of this process are judges, who play an essential role as the principal interpreters of the law. In their judicial role, they analyse and apply the law to the cases before them. Their decisions are not limited to resolving individual disputes; they often set precedents that guide future interpretation of the law. For example, Supreme Court decisions in many countries have a lasting impact on the understanding and application of the law. At the same time, doctrine, which encompasses the work of academics, lawyers and jurists, plays an advisory but influential role in the interpretation of the law. Although their analyses and commentaries are not legally binding, they offer in-depth perspectives that can inform and influence legal reasoning. Academic articles or expert commentaries on specific legislation, for example, can provide arguments and interpretations that are then used by judges in their decisions. Finally, the legislature, the entity responsible for creating laws, holds the power of authentic interpretation. When the legislature intervenes to clarify or amend a law, this intervention is considered definitive, as it comes from the authority that created the law. This form of interpretation may be necessary when laws are ambiguous or incomplete. For example, a parliament may pass new legislation or an amendment to clarify a legal provision that was previously vague or open to different interpretations. Each of these players - judges, academics and legislators - makes a unique contribution to the interpretation and application of the law. Their interaction and mutual influence ensure that the law remains dynamic, adaptive and relevant to the changing challenges and complexities of modern society.

Gaps in the law

Gaps in the law are an inevitable phenomenon in any legal system, resulting from the difficulty, if not the impossibility, for the legislator to foresee all possible situations when drafting legislation. These gaps arise when real situations arise that are not explicitly covered by existing legislation, creating areas of legal uncertainty. There are two types of gaps in positive law: voluntary gaps and involuntary gaps. Voluntary gaps occur when the legislature deliberately chooses not to regulate a certain matter or situation, leaving it to the discretion of judges or other resolution mechanisms. For example, in certain areas of law, the legislature may intentionally leave vague terms or concepts open to interpretation to allow for flexibility in the application of the law.

On the other hand, unintended gaps occur when the legislature, without any particular intention, fails to address an issue or situation that was not contemplated when the law was drafted. These gaps may become apparent with the evolution of society, the emergence of new technologies or new situations. For example, the advent of the Internet and social media has created numerous legal challenges that were not anticipated by traditional laws on communication and privacy. When such gaps arise, it is often up to judges to fill them by interpreting existing law to apply to the new situation. This process may involve extending existing principles to new circumstances or applying analogies with legally regulated situations. In some cases, the recognition of a gap may lead the legislature to intervene to fill the gap through new laws or amendments.When creating a law, the legislature cannot foresee all the actual cases that may arise. If the situation is not mentioned by the legislator, there is a gap in the positive law. This gap may or may not be intentional.

Interpreting the law in the presence of gaps, i.e. when the existing rules do not cover a given situation, requires the use of specific methods of interpretation. These methods aim to fill legal gaps and provide solutions for cases that are not explicitly covered by existing legislation. One of the methods commonly used is interpretation by analogy. This approach involves applying to the situation not covered an existing rule that governs similar cases or shares fundamental principles with the situation in question. For example, if a new form of commercial contract emerges that is not explicitly covered by existing contract law, a judge may look for rules applicable to similar forms of contract and apply them by analogy. Another method is teleological interpretation, which focuses on the intention or objective of the legislature. This method seeks to determine the underlying purpose of existing laws and to extend their application so as to achieve that purpose in the case not covered. For example, if a law aims to protect online privacy, this intention can be used to interpret the law to cover new technological scenarios not explicitly provided for in the statute.

In some legal systems, general principles of law also play an important role in filling gaps. These principles, which represent the conceptual foundations of the legal system, can serve as a guide for interpretation and decision-making in situations not explicitly regulated by law. Finally, in some cases, gaps may prompt the legislature to intervene and create new laws or amend existing laws to deal explicitly with the situation not covered. This is often the case in rapidly evolving fields such as technology or the environment, where new challenges regularly emerge. Overall, interpreting the law in the presence of gaps requires a combination of creativity, analytical rigour and a thorough understanding of legal principles, to ensure that the decisions taken are fair, reasonable and in keeping with the spirit of the legal system.

The intra legem gap (in the law)

The concept of an intra legem lacuna refers to a particular situation where a law, intentionally or not, leaves room for the judge's discretion, often due to the use of vague, unknown or indeterminate terms. This form of lacuna is distinguished by the fact that the legislature, recognising the complexity and diversity of real-life situations, deliberately leaves certain aspects of the law open to interpretation. In these cases, the legislature leaves it to the judge's discretion to determine how the law should be applied in specific situations. For example, a law may use terms such as "reasonable", "fair" or "in the public interest", which are not strictly defined. These terms give the judge some latitude to interpret the law according to the particular circumstances of each case.

This approach recognizes that the legislature cannot anticipate all the particular situations and nuances that may arise. By leaving certain terms open to interpretation, the legislature allows judges, who are directly confronted with the specific facts of each case, to use their expertise and judgment to apply the law in the fairest and most appropriate manner. The intra legem lacuna is therefore an important element of the law that reflects the necessary flexibility in the application of the law. It allows the legal system to adapt to individual cases while remaining faithful to the general intentions and objectives of the legislature. This flexibility is crucial to ensuring that justice is done not only according to the letter of the law, but also according to its spirit.

Code des obligations - article 44

Article 44 of the Swiss Code of Obligations is an illustrative example of referral to the judge by the legislator, where certain formulas are used to confer discretionary power on the judge in the application of the law. This article shows how the legislator can intentionally leave the judge room for manoeuvre to take account of the particular circumstances of each case.

In the first paragraph of section 44, the judge is given the power to reduce damages, or even not to award damages, according to specific criteria. These include situations where the injured party has consented to the injury or where facts for which it is responsible have contributed to the injury. This provision allows the judge to take into account the nuances and shared responsibilities in situations of damage. The second paragraph goes further by allowing the judge to equitably reduce damages in cases where the injury was not caused intentionally or by gross negligence, and where full reparation would expose the debtor to hardship. This clause gives the judge the necessary latitude to assess the economic consequences of the reparation on the debtor and to adjust the damages accordingly.

These provisions illustrate the legislature's recognition of the complexity of legal situations and the need to allow a degree of flexibility in resolving them. By entrusting the judge with the task of interpreting and applying the law in a way that is appropriate to each situation, the Swiss Code of Obligations demonstrates an approach to the law that values fairness and taking individual circumstances into account. This demonstrates the trust placed in the judiciary to show discernment and adaptability in the application of legal principles.

Code civil suisse - article 4

Article 4 of the Swiss Civil Code highlights the concept of the judge's discretion, a crucial element in the application of the law. This provision illustrates how the legislator recognises and frames the role of the judge in interpreting and applying the law, taking into account the unique nature of each case. According to this article, the judge is not only required to apply the rules of law strictly, but also to exercise his or her judgment in accordance with equity when the law permits or requires it. This occurs in cases where the law itself expressly grants the judge the power to take account of the particular circumstances of a case or "just cause". For example, in family or child custody cases, the judge may have to make decisions that depart from the strict application of the law to best protect the interests of the child, based on the specific circumstances of the case.

This discretionary power is fundamental to ensuring that justice is adaptive and personalised. It recognises that legal situations are not always black and white and that rigid application of the law can sometimes lead to unfair or inappropriate outcomes. By entrusting the judge with the power to apply the law in a flexible manner, the Swiss Civil Code allows for an interpretation and application of the law that is both fair and adapted to the complex and diverse realities of life in society. This article reflects the confidence of the Swiss legal system in the discernment and competence of its judges, enabling them to use their expertise to achieve the fairest and most appropriate outcome in each case. Ultimately, the judge's discretion is an essential tool for ensuring that justice is not just a mechanical application of the law, but also a careful consideration of fairness and justice in each particular situation.

The praeter legem gap (beyond the law)

The praeter legem gap, or gap beyond the law, represents a situation where the legislator, often unintentionally, leaves a legal vacuum by not providing any legal provision for a specific situation. This form of lacuna occurs when cases arise that were not envisaged or taken into account by the legislator when drafting the law, leading to the absence of rules or guidelines on how to deal with them. Unlike the intra legem gap, where the legislator intentionally leaves a certain degree of interpretation open, the praeter legem gap is typically unanticipated and results from a lack of foresight or recognition of future developments. Such gaps can be particularly prevalent in rapidly evolving areas, such as technology, where new situations can arise faster than the legislative process is able to regulate them.

For example, legal issues relating to artificial intelligence, online data privacy or the implications of genome editing are areas where praeter legem gaps may be present. In these cases, there is no specific legal framework to guide the application or interpretation of the law. When a praeter legem gap is identified, judges may use various methods to fill the gap. They may rely on general principles of law, on analogies with similar situations regulated by law, or on considerations of equity and justice. In some cases, the recognition of such a gap may stimulate the legislative process, prompting the legislature to draft new laws or amend existing laws to deal explicitly with the situation in question.

Code civil suisse - article 1

Article 1 of the Swiss Civil Code provides a clear illustration of how the legal system deals with situations where existing law does not cover a specific situation. This legal provision highlights the methodology and flexibility required to interpret and apply the law. According to the first paragraph of this article, the law is supposed to govern all matters that fall within the scope of its provisions, either explicitly by their letter or implicitly by their spirit. This means that the judge must first seek a solution within the framework of existing legislation, by interpreting the law not only according to its text but also according to the intention and purpose of the legislature. For example, in a contractual dispute, the judge would seek to apply the principles of contract law as set out in the Code, while taking into account the general intention of the legislature regarding contractual agreements.

Where no specific statutory provision is applicable, the second paragraph of the Swiss Civil Code empowers the judge to turn to customary law. In the event that even customary law is inapplicable, the judge is then invited to act as if he were the legislator, establishing rules for the given situation. This approach gives the judge considerable latitude to develop legal solutions based on the fundamental principles of justice and equity. This could happen, for example, in cases involving new or emerging technologies where neither law nor custom provides clear guidance. Finally, the third paragraph guides the judge towards solutions already established in doctrine and case law. In the absence of applicable laws or customs, the judge should consider academic legal analyses and interpretations, as well as judicial precedents. This may include examining expert commentaries on similar cases or analysing past court decisions in comparable situations. Article 1 of the Swiss Civil Code thus demonstrates the importance of flexible and considered legal interpretation, enabling judges to respond effectively to legal gaps and adapt to changing circumstances in society. This provision ensures that the law remains dynamic and capable of responding to the ever-changing needs of individuals and society.

Annexes

• Code civil suisse
• Déclaration des Droits de l'Homme et du Citoyen de 1789
• Convention européenne des droits de l’Homme

• Déclaration de Virginie : étude de texte
  • version originale
  • version française