The multiculturalist perspective - Historique des versions

Arthur le 8 mars 2020 à 11:58

2020-03-08T11:58:18Z

@@ Ligne 1 : / Ligne 1 : @@
 {{Translations
 | fr = La perspective multiculturaliste
 }}

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

2020-03-08T10:02:05Z

The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005)

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 12:02
Ligne 230 :		Ligne 230 :
	For Fraser, denial of recognition should not be seen as psychic harm/deformation, or autonomous cultural harm, but as an institutionalised relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and the 'meanings' / power relations inherent in them<ref>Renault, Emmanuel. "[https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/324/32427211.pdf What is the use of the notion of the struggle of recognition?]." Revista de Ciencia Política 27.2 (2007): 195-205.</ref><ref>Kompridis, N. (2007). Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition. European Journal of Political Theory, 6(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107077311</ref>;		For Fraser, denial of recognition should not be seen as psychic harm/deformation, or autonomous cultural harm, but as an institutionalised relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and the 'meanings' / power relations inherent in them<ref>Renault, Emmanuel. "[https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/324/32427211.pdf What is the use of the notion of the struggle of recognition?]." Revista de Ciencia Política 27.2 (2007): 195-205.</ref><ref>Kompridis, N. (2007). Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition. European Journal of Political Theory, 6(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107077311</ref>;

	Thus, the normative criterion to which social justice must be directed is parity of participation: "An institutionalized model of cultural values constitutes some actors as something less than full members of society and is an obstacle to their participation on an equal footing. Repairing denial of recognition means replacing institutionalized value models that are a barrier to equal participation with models that enable or promote it".		Thus, the normative criterion to which social justice must be directed is parity of participation: "An institutionalized model of cultural values constitutes some actors as something less than full members of society and is an obstacle to their participation on an equal footing. Repairing denial of recognition means replacing institutionalized value models that are a barrier to equal participation with models that enable or promote it".<ref>Fraser Nancy, « 3. Repenser la reconnaissance », dans : , Qu'est-ce que la justice sociale ?Reconnaissance et redistribution, sous la direction de Fraser Nancy. Paris, La Découverte, « Poche/Sciences humaines et sociales », 2011, p. 71-92. URL : https://www.cairn.info/qu-est-ce-que-la-justice-sociale--9782707167897-page-71.htm</ref>

	= Annexes =		= Annexes =

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

2020-03-08T10:00:05Z

The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005)

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 12:00
Ligne 228 :		Ligne 228 :
	The denial of recognition translates into a relationship of social subordination or statutory subordination, in the sense of an impediment to participating as a peer in social life that results from an institutionalized set of cultural codes and values.<ref>Fraser, Nancy. "[https://search.proquest.com/openview/dc128bd9c0ce00f0938e02614e60397f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819646 Rethinking recognition]." New left review 3 (2000): 107.</ref>		The denial of recognition translates into a relationship of social subordination or statutory subordination, in the sense of an impediment to participating as a peer in social life that results from an institutionalized set of cultural codes and values.<ref>Fraser, Nancy. "[https://search.proquest.com/openview/dc128bd9c0ce00f0938e02614e60397f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819646 Rethinking recognition]." New left review 3 (2000): 107.</ref>

	For Fraser, denial of recognition should not be seen as psychic harm/deformation, or autonomous cultural harm, but as an institutionalised relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and the 'meanings' / power relations inherent in them;		For Fraser, denial of recognition should not be seen as psychic harm/deformation, or autonomous cultural harm, but as an institutionalised relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and the 'meanings' / power relations inherent in them<ref>Renault, Emmanuel. "[https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/324/32427211.pdf What is the use of the notion of the struggle of recognition?]." Revista de Ciencia Política 27.2 (2007): 195-205.</ref><ref>Kompridis, N. (2007). Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition. European Journal of Political Theory, 6(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107077311</ref>;

	Thus, the normative criterion to which social justice must be directed is parity of participation: "An institutionalized model of cultural values constitutes some actors as something less than full members of society and is an obstacle to their participation on an equal footing. Repairing denial of recognition means replacing institutionalized value models that are a barrier to equal participation with models that enable or promote it".		Thus, the normative criterion to which social justice must be directed is parity of participation: "An institutionalized model of cultural values constitutes some actors as something less than full members of society and is an obstacle to their participation on an equal footing. Repairing denial of recognition means replacing institutionalized value models that are a barrier to equal participation with models that enable or promote it".

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

2020-03-08T09:57:28Z

The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005)

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 11:57
Ligne 224 :		Ligne 224 :
	The crowding out of redistribution (because this model approaches recognition only as a response to the problem of cultural depreciation or, like Honneth, states that revaluing depreciated identities is a way of addressing distributive injustices)<ref>“Social and Political Recognition.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://www.iep.utm.edu/recog_sp/</ref>;		The crowding out of redistribution (because this model approaches recognition only as a response to the problem of cultural depreciation or, like Honneth, states that revaluing depreciated identities is a way of addressing distributive injustices)<ref>“Social and Political Recognition.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://www.iep.utm.edu/recog_sp/</ref>;

	The reification of identity (thinking of the politics of recognition as identity politics tends to obscure the differences within cultural groups and the power struggles within them). It proposes a logic centred around status. Thus, it is no longer the specific identity of an individual or a group that requires recognition, but rather the status as a full partner in social interaction.		The reification of identity (thinking of the politics of recognition as identity politics tends to obscure the differences within cultural groups and the power struggles within them).<ref>Fraser, Nancy. "[https://books.google.fr/books?hl=en&lr=&id=qEtiw1xuT8EC&oi=fnd&pg=PA21&dq=reification+fraser&ots=Hi4_WkPHY6&sig=cOmdHJjIO_OyHqNhKp8EhH_yidA#v=onepage&q=reification%20fraser&f=false Rethinking recognition: overcoming displacement and reification in cultural politics]." Recognition struggles and social movements: Contested identities, agency and power (2003): 21-32.</ref> It proposes a logic centred around status. Thus, it is no longer the specific identity of an individual or a group that requires recognition, but rather the status as a full partner in social interaction.

	The denial of recognition translates into a relationship of social subordination or statutory subordination, in the sense of an impediment to participating as a peer in social life that results from an institutionalized set of cultural codes and values.		The denial of recognition translates into a relationship of social subordination or statutory subordination, in the sense of an impediment to participating as a peer in social life that results from an institutionalized set of cultural codes and values.<ref>Fraser, Nancy. "[https://search.proquest.com/openview/dc128bd9c0ce00f0938e02614e60397f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819646 Rethinking recognition]." New left review 3 (2000): 107.</ref>

	For Fraser, denial of recognition should not be seen as psychic harm/deformation, or autonomous cultural harm, but as an institutionalised relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and the 'meanings' / power relations inherent in them;		For Fraser, denial of recognition should not be seen as psychic harm/deformation, or autonomous cultural harm, but as an institutionalised relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and the 'meanings' / power relations inherent in them;

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

2020-03-08T09:53:51Z

The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005)

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 11:53
Ligne 218 :		Ligne 218 :
	Attention to recognition tends to obscure distributive injustices. There is therefore a need for a theory of social justice that can articulate both socio-economic injustices (exploitation, marginalization or economic exclusion) and injustices in the cultural sphere (cultural domination through the imposition of social models): "we are thus faced with a complex dilemma, which I shall call the redistribution/recognition dilemma: people who are simultaneously objects of cultural injustice and economic injustice need both recognition and redistribution; they need both to claim and to deny their specificity".<ref>Fraser, Nancy. "[http://bibliopreta.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Fraser-Redistribution-Recognition-Dilema-1.pdf From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a'post-socialist'age]." New left review (1995): 68-68.</ref>		Attention to recognition tends to obscure distributive injustices. There is therefore a need for a theory of social justice that can articulate both socio-economic injustices (exploitation, marginalization or economic exclusion) and injustices in the cultural sphere (cultural domination through the imposition of social models): "we are thus faced with a complex dilemma, which I shall call the redistribution/recognition dilemma: people who are simultaneously objects of cultural injustice and economic injustice need both recognition and redistribution; they need both to claim and to deny their specificity".<ref>Fraser, Nancy. "[http://bibliopreta.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Fraser-Redistribution-Recognition-Dilema-1.pdf From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a'post-socialist'age]." New left review (1995): 68-68.</ref>

	Unlike Honneth (who has a monistic moral theory of recognition), Fraser proposes a bifocal theory of social justice that overcomes the impasses of the politics of recognition as identity politics:		Unlike Honneth (who has a monistic moral theory of recognition), Fraser proposes a bifocal theory of social justice that overcomes the impasses of the politics of recognition as identity politics<ref>THOMPSON, S. (2005). Is redistribution a form of recognition? comments on the Fraser–Honneth debate. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 8(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369823042000335876</ref>:

	Recognition aims at the affirmation of differentiation, while redistribution aims at the disappearance of social differences, thus tending towards equality. How can these two postures be reconciled, especially when they have effects at the same time, as in the case of gender and race?		Recognition aims at the affirmation of differentiation, while redistribution aims at the disappearance of social differences, thus tending towards equality. How can these two postures be reconciled, especially when they have effects at the same time, as in the case of gender and race?

	The crowding out of redistribution (because this model approaches recognition only as a response to the problem of cultural depreciation or, like Honneth, states that revaluing depreciated identities is a way of addressing distributive injustices);		The crowding out of redistribution (because this model approaches recognition only as a response to the problem of cultural depreciation or, like Honneth, states that revaluing depreciated identities is a way of addressing distributive injustices)<ref>“Social and Political Recognition.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://www.iep.utm.edu/recog_sp/</ref>;

	The reification of identity (thinking of the politics of recognition as identity politics tends to obscure the differences within cultural groups and the power struggles within them). It proposes a logic centred around status. Thus, it is no longer the specific identity of an individual or a group that requires recognition, but rather the status as a full partner in social interaction.		The reification of identity (thinking of the politics of recognition as identity politics tends to obscure the differences within cultural groups and the power struggles within them). It proposes a logic centred around status. Thus, it is no longer the specific identity of an individual or a group that requires recognition, but rather the status as a full partner in social interaction.

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

2020-03-08T09:50:20Z

The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005)

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 11:50
Ligne 216 :		Ligne 216 :
	[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Fraser Fraser] tries to reconcile distributive justice and recognition in a theory called bifocality. She finds it frustrating that it's all about multiculturalism and recognition, it's all about going back to distributive justice, but at the same time it's important to look at the recognition issues in their proper light and in their proper importance.		[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Fraser Fraser] tries to reconcile distributive justice and recognition in a theory called bifocality. She finds it frustrating that it's all about multiculturalism and recognition, it's all about going back to distributive justice, but at the same time it's important to look at the recognition issues in their proper light and in their proper importance.

	Attention to recognition tends to obscure distributive injustices. There is therefore a need for a theory of social justice that can articulate both socio-economic injustices (exploitation, marginalization or economic exclusion) and injustices in the cultural sphere (cultural domination through the imposition of social models): "we are thus faced with a complex dilemma, which I shall call the redistribution/recognition dilemma: people who are simultaneously objects of cultural injustice and economic injustice need both recognition and redistribution; they need both to claim and to deny their specificity".		Attention to recognition tends to obscure distributive injustices. There is therefore a need for a theory of social justice that can articulate both socio-economic injustices (exploitation, marginalization or economic exclusion) and injustices in the cultural sphere (cultural domination through the imposition of social models): "we are thus faced with a complex dilemma, which I shall call the redistribution/recognition dilemma: people who are simultaneously objects of cultural injustice and economic injustice need both recognition and redistribution; they need both to claim and to deny their specificity".<ref>Fraser, Nancy. "[http://bibliopreta.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Fraser-Redistribution-Recognition-Dilema-1.pdf From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a'post-socialist'age]." New left review (1995): 68-68.</ref>

	Unlike Honneth (who has a monistic moral theory of recognition), Fraser proposes a bifocal theory of social justice that overcomes the impasses of the politics of recognition as identity politics:		Unlike Honneth (who has a monistic moral theory of recognition), Fraser proposes a bifocal theory of social justice that overcomes the impasses of the politics of recognition as identity politics:

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

2020-03-08T09:47:38Z

The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005)

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 11:47
Ligne 230 :		Ligne 230 :
	For Fraser, denial of recognition should not be seen as psychic harm/deformation, or autonomous cultural harm, but as an institutionalised relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and the 'meanings' / power relations inherent in them;		For Fraser, denial of recognition should not be seen as psychic harm/deformation, or autonomous cultural harm, but as an institutionalised relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and the 'meanings' / power relations inherent in them;

	Thus, the normative criterion to which social justice must be directed is parity of participation: "An institutionalized model of cultural values constitutes some actors in something less than full~~-fledged~~ members of society and is an obstacle to their equal ~~participation~~. Repairing denial of recognition means replacing institutionalized value models that are ~~an obstacle~~ to ~~parity of~~ participation with models that ~~allow~~ or promote it.		Thus, the normative criterion to which social justice must be directed is parity of participation: "An institutionalized model of cultural values constitutes some actors as something less than full members of society and is an obstacle to their participation on an equal footing. Repairing denial of recognition means replacing institutionalized value models that are a barrier to equal participation with models that enable or promote it".

	= Annexes =		= Annexes =

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

2020-03-08T09:46:43Z

The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005)

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 11:46
Ligne 226 :		Ligne 226 :
	The reification of identity (thinking of the politics of recognition as identity politics tends to obscure the differences within cultural groups and the power struggles within them). It proposes a logic centred around status. Thus, it is no longer the specific identity of an individual or a group that requires recognition, but rather the status as a full partner in social interaction.		The reification of identity (thinking of the politics of recognition as identity politics tends to obscure the differences within cultural groups and the power struggles within them). It proposes a logic centred around status. Thus, it is no longer the specific identity of an individual or a group that requires recognition, but rather the status as a full partner in social interaction.

	The denial of recognition ~~is reflected in~~ a relationship of social subordination or statutory subordination, in the sense of an impediment to ~~participation~~ as a peer in social life that results from an institutionalized set of cultural codes and values.		The denial of recognition translates into a relationship of social subordination or statutory subordination, in the sense of an impediment to participating as a peer in social life that results from an institutionalized set of cultural codes and values.

	Fraser ~~argues that~~ denial of recognition should not be seen as ~~psychological~~ harm / ~~distortion~~, or autonomous cultural ~~prejudice~~, but as an ~~institutionalized~~ relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and by the' meanings' / power relations inherent in them;		For Fraser, denial of recognition should not be seen as psychic harm/deformation, or autonomous cultural harm, but as an institutionalised relationship of social subordination, produced by social institutions and the 'meanings' / power relations inherent in them;

	Thus, the normative criterion to which social justice must ~~aspire~~ is participation ~~parity~~:"An institutionalized model of cultural values constitutes some actors in something less than full-fledged members of society and is an obstacle to their equal participation. Repairing denial of recognition means replacing institutionalized value models that are an obstacle to parity of participation with models that allow or promote it.		Thus, the normative criterion to which social justice must be directed is parity of participation: "An institutionalized model of cultural values constitutes some actors in something less than full-fledged members of society and is an obstacle to their equal participation. Repairing denial of recognition means replacing institutionalized value models that are an obstacle to parity of participation with models that allow or promote it.

	= Annexes =		= Annexes =

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

2020-03-08T09:45:48Z

The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005)

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 11:45
Ligne 218 :		Ligne 218 :
	Attention to recognition tends to obscure distributive injustices. There is therefore a need for a theory of social justice that can articulate both socio-economic injustices (exploitation, marginalization or economic exclusion) and injustices in the cultural sphere (cultural domination through the imposition of social models): "we are thus faced with a complex dilemma, which I shall call the redistribution/recognition dilemma: people who are simultaneously objects of cultural injustice and economic injustice need both recognition and redistribution; they need both to claim and to deny their specificity".		Attention to recognition tends to obscure distributive injustices. There is therefore a need for a theory of social justice that can articulate both socio-economic injustices (exploitation, marginalization or economic exclusion) and injustices in the cultural sphere (cultural domination through the imposition of social models): "we are thus faced with a complex dilemma, which I shall call the redistribution/recognition dilemma: people who are simultaneously objects of cultural injustice and economic injustice need both recognition and redistribution; they need both to claim and to deny their specificity".

	Unlike Honneth (who has a monistic moral theory of recognition), Fraser proposes a bifocal theory of social justice~~, which knows how to overcome~~ the impasses of the politics of recognition ~~understood~~ as politics ~~of identity~~:		Unlike Honneth (who has a monistic moral theory of recognition), Fraser proposes a bifocal theory of social justice that overcomes the impasses of the politics of recognition as identity politics:

	Recognition ~~is aimed~~ at ~~affirming~~ differentiation, while redistribution ~~is aimed~~ at the disappearance of social differences, thus tending towards equality. How can these two ~~positions~~ be reconciled, especially when they ~~work together~~, as in the case of gender and race?		Recognition aims at the affirmation of differentiation, while redistribution aims at the disappearance of social differences, thus tending towards equality. How can these two postures be reconciled, especially when they have effects at the same time, as in the case of gender and race?

	The ~~ousting~~ of redistribution (because ~~on the one hand,~~ this model ~~apprehends~~ recognition ~~solely~~ as a response to the problem of cultural depreciation or, like Honneth, states that ~~reassessing~~ depreciated identities is a way of ~~tackling~~ distributive injustices);		The crowding out of redistribution (because this model approaches recognition only as a response to the problem of cultural depreciation or, like Honneth, states that revaluing depreciated identities is a way of addressing distributive injustices);

	The reification of identity (thinking of the politics of recognition as a politics ~~of identity conceals~~ differences within cultural groups and power struggles within them). It proposes a status~~-based logic~~. Thus, it is no longer the specific identity of ~~the~~ individual or a group that requires recognition, but rather the status of a full partner in social interaction:		The reification of identity (thinking of the politics of recognition as identity politics tends to obscure the differences within cultural groups and the power struggles within them). It proposes a logic centred around status. Thus, it is no longer the specific identity of an individual or a group that requires recognition, but rather the status as a full partner in social interaction.

	The denial of recognition is reflected in a relationship of social subordination or statutory subordination, in the sense of an impediment to participation as a peer in social life that results from an institutionalized set of cultural codes and values.		The denial of recognition is reflected in a relationship of social subordination or statutory subordination, in the sense of an impediment to participation as a peer in social life that results from an institutionalized set of cultural codes and values.

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

2020-03-08T09:44:46Z

The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005)

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 11:44
Ligne 216 :		Ligne 216 :
	[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Fraser Fraser] tries to reconcile distributive justice and recognition in a theory called bifocality. She finds it frustrating that it's all about multiculturalism and recognition, it's all about going back to distributive justice, but at the same time it's important to look at the recognition issues in their proper light and in their proper importance.		[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Fraser Fraser] tries to reconcile distributive justice and recognition in a theory called bifocality. She finds it frustrating that it's all about multiculturalism and recognition, it's all about going back to distributive justice, but at the same time it's important to look at the recognition issues in their proper light and in their proper importance.

	Attention to recognition tends to obscure distributive injustices. There is therefore a need for a theory of social justice that can articulate both socio-economic injustices (exploitation, marginalization or economic exclusion) and injustices in the cultural sphere (cultural domination through the imposition of social models): We are thus faced with a complex dilemma, which I ~~will~~ call the redistribution/recognition dilemma: people who are simultaneously ~~subjected to~~ cultural and economic injustice need both recognition and redistribution; they need both to claim and deny their specificity.		Attention to recognition tends to obscure distributive injustices. There is therefore a need for a theory of social justice that can articulate both socio-economic injustices (exploitation, marginalization or economic exclusion) and injustices in the cultural sphere (cultural domination through the imposition of social models): "we are thus faced with a complex dilemma, which I shall call the redistribution/recognition dilemma: people who are simultaneously objects of cultural injustice and economic injustice need both recognition and redistribution; they need both to claim and to deny their specificity".

	Unlike Honneth (who has a monistic moral theory of recognition), Fraser proposes a bifocal theory of social justice, which knows how to overcome the impasses of the politics of recognition understood as politics of identity:		Unlike Honneth (who has a monistic moral theory of recognition), Fraser proposes a bifocal theory of social justice, which knows how to overcome the impasses of the politics of recognition understood as politics of identity:

The multiculturalist perspective - Historique des versions

Arthur le 8 mars 2020 à 11:58

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */

Arthur : /* The dilemma of "recognition - redistribution" according to Nancy Fraser (What is social justice?, 2005) */