Intelligence and Surveillance - Historique des versions

Arthur le 27 septembre 2022 à 22:26

2022-09-27T22:26:08Z

← Version précédente		Version du 28 septembre 2022 à 00:26
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
	é{{Infobox Lecture		{{Infobox Lecture
	\| image =		\| image =
	\| image_caption =		\| image_caption =

Arthur le 3 août 2021 à 07:01

2021-08-03T07:01:50Z

← Version précédente		Version du 3 août 2021 à 09:01
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
	{{Infobox Lecture		é{{Infobox Lecture
	\| image =		\| image =
	\| image_caption =		\| image_caption =

Arthur le 24 juillet 2021 à 08:27

2021-07-24T08:27:51Z

← Version précédente		Version du 24 juillet 2021 à 10:27
Ligne 28 :		Ligne 28 :
	\| fr = Renseignement et logiques de surveillance		\| fr = Renseignement et logiques de surveillance
	\| es = Inteligencia y lógicas de vigilancia		\| es = Inteligencia y lógicas de vigilancia
			\| lt = Žvalgyba ir stebėjimas
	}}		}}

Arthur le 11 février 2018 à 14:39

2018-02-11T14:39:03Z

← Version précédente		Version du 11 février 2018 à 16:39
Ligne 8 :		Ligne 8 :
	\| assistants =		\| assistants =
	\| enregistrement = [https://mediaserver.unige.ch/collection/AN3-1220-2014-2015.rss 2014], [https://mediaserver.unige.ch/collection/AN3-1220-2014-2015.rss 2015]		\| enregistrement = [https://mediaserver.unige.ch/collection/AN3-1220-2014-2015.rss 2014], [https://mediaserver.unige.ch/collection/AN3-1220-2014-2015.rss 2015]
	\| cours = [[~~La violence politique et la pratique de la sécurité~~]]		\| cours = [[Political Violence and Security Practices]]
	\| lectures =		\| lectures =
	*[[Political violence and the practice of security]]		*[[Political violence and the practice of security]]

Arthur le 11 février 2018 à 14:34

2018-02-11T14:34:02Z

← Version précédente		Version du 11 février 2018 à 16:34
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
			{{Infobox Lecture
			\| image =
			\| image_caption =
			\| faculté =
			\| département =
			\| professeurs = [[Stephan Davidshofer]]<ref>[[http://unige.academia.edu/StephanDavidshofer\|Stephan Davidshofer \| University of Geneva]] - Academia.edu</ref><ref>[http://www.cairn.info/publications-de-Davidshofer-Stephan--56940.htm Publications de Stephan Davidshofer] \| Cairn.info</ref><ref>Davidshofer, Stephan. “[http://www.theses.fr/2009IEPP0047 La Gestion De Crise Européenne Ou Quand L'Europe Rencontre La Sécurité : Modalités Pratiques Et Symboliques D'une Autonomisation].” Http://Www.theses.fr/, Paris, Institut D'études Politiques, 1 Jan. 2009</ref> <br> [[Christian Olsson]]<ref>[http://philoscsoc.ulb.be/fr/users/colsson Page personnelle de Christian Olsson sur le site de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles]</ref><ref>[http://ulb.academia.edu/COlsson Page de Christian Olsson sur Academia.edu]</ref><ref>[https://fr.linkedin.com/in/christian-olsson-2ba437b Profile Linkedin de Christian Olsson]</ref>
			\| assistants =
			\| assistants =
			\| enregistrement = [https://mediaserver.unige.ch/collection/AN3-1220-2014-2015.rss 2014], [https://mediaserver.unige.ch/collection/AN3-1220-2014-2015.rss 2015]
			\| cours = [[La violence politique et la pratique de la sécurité]]
			\| lectures =
			*[[Political violence and the practice of security]]
			*[[The birth of modern warfare: war-making and state-making from a Western perspective]]
			*[[Transformations of war and violence in Europe]]
			*[[War beyond the West: is the modern state a Western invention?]]
			*[[What is non-state violence? The Case of Afghan Conflict]]
			*[[Intervention: Reinventing war?]]
			*[[Security professionals: bureaucratization, institutionalization, professionalization and differentiation]]
			*[[The transformation of contemporary security practices: between war and global policing?]]
			*[[The transformation of contemporary security practices: the logic of risk]]
			*[[Privatized coercion: from mercenarism to private military companies]]
			*[[Intelligence and Surveillance]]
			}}

	How can the logic of intelligence, its transformations, but also the intelligence professions and the different intelligence agencies, their transformation, be read and understood through the common thread of state building and the role of violence management in the process of state building and its contemporary aftermath? Intelligence is both a practice and a profession, there is a fairly clear affinity in terms of risk logic.		How can the logic of intelligence, its transformations, but also the intelligence professions and the different intelligence agencies, their transformation, be read and understood through the common thread of state building and the role of violence management in the process of state building and its contemporary aftermath? Intelligence is both a practice and a profession, there is a fairly clear affinity in terms of risk logic.

Arthur le 9 février 2018 à 16:21

2018-02-09T16:21:41Z

← Version précédente		Version du 9 février 2018 à 18:21
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
	How can the logic of intelligence, its transformations, but also the intelligence professions and the different intelligence agencies, their transformation, be read and understood through the common thread of state building and the role of violence management in the process of state building and its contemporary aftermath? Intelligence is both a practice and a profession, there is a fairly clear affinity in terms of risk logic.		How can the logic of intelligence, its transformations, but also the intelligence professions and the different intelligence agencies, their transformation, be read and understood through the common thread of state building and the role of violence management in the process of state building and its contemporary aftermath? Intelligence is both a practice and a profession, there is a fairly clear affinity in terms of risk logic.

			{{Translations
			\| fr = Renseignement et logiques de surveillance
			\| es = Inteligencia y lógicas de vigilancia
			}}

	= The emergence of intelligence within the State and the structuring of its various agencies =		= The emergence of intelligence within the State and the structuring of its various agencies =

Arthur : /* References */

2018-02-08T23:03:14Z

References

← Version précédente		Version du 9 février 2018 à 01:03
Ligne 97 :		Ligne 97 :
	<references/>		<references/>

	[[Category:science~~-politique~~]] [[Category:relations ~~internationales~~]]		[[Category:political science]]
			[[Category:international relations]]
			[[Category:Stephan Davidshofer]]
			[[Category:Christian Olsson]]
			[[Category:security]]
			[[Category:2014]]

Arthur : /* La transformation des pratiques de renseignement : vers une surveillance de masse ? */

2018-02-08T22:52:09Z

La transformation des pratiques de renseignement : vers une surveillance de masse ?

Voir les modifications

Arthur : /* Nature of the information and its agencies */

2018-02-08T22:50:07Z

Nature of the information and its agencies

← Version précédente		Version du 9 février 2018 à 00:50
Ligne 28 :		Ligne 28 :
	*criminal intelligence: refers to perpetrators, events, sentences, networks, assets and liabilities, travel, places, means of transportation, methods of communication, but which have in common to be related to common crime. We are in a classic police intelligence logic because to conduct an investigation, we need information in order to build a file that allows us to be investigated. Intelligence is an integral part of the judicial police. We are going to gather clues, but as such it is not evidence, but evidence to investigate a case. Intelligence is part of criminal justice, but framed within a legal framework that is a rule of law. Intelligence can be provided within a specific legal framework.		*criminal intelligence: refers to perpetrators, events, sentences, networks, assets and liabilities, travel, places, means of transportation, methods of communication, but which have in common to be related to common crime. We are in a classic police intelligence logic because to conduct an investigation, we need information in order to build a file that allows us to be investigated. Intelligence is an integral part of the judicial police. We are going to gather clues, but as such it is not evidence, but evidence to investigate a case. Intelligence is part of criminal justice, but framed within a legal framework that is a rule of law. Intelligence can be provided within a specific legal framework.
	*Security Intelligence: deals with the prevention of attacks on national security (subversion, foreign interference, espionage, terrorism). Security intelligence extends abroad and concerns the protection of the state, at the internal level, we are in the "high police". Security intelligence is something that is spreading, especially abroad. Criminal intelligence is internally regulated by a legal framework, and external intelligence is not regulated by the same rules. The same rules do not apply to intelligence services if they are internal or external. One is a legal framework and the other is beyond the domain of state reason.		*Security Intelligence: deals with the prevention of attacks on national security (subversion, foreign interference, espionage, terrorism). Security intelligence extends abroad and concerns the protection of the state, at the internal level, we are in the "high police". Security intelligence is something that is spreading, especially abroad. Criminal intelligence is internally regulated by a legal framework, and external intelligence is not regulated by the same rules. The same rules do not apply to intelligence services if they are internal or external. One is a legal framework and the other is beyond the domain of state reason.
	military intelligence: refers to the equipment, manpower, movements, methods, technologies, strategies and tactics of foreign military forces. In a new security environment, we can see that military intelligence is no longer necessarily the main component of intelligence today, even if it exists everywhere.		*military intelligence: refers to the equipment, manpower, movements, methods, technologies, strategies and tactics of foreign military forces. In a new security environment, we can see that military intelligence is no longer necessarily the main component of intelligence today, even if it exists everywhere.

	But intelligence is not evidence. These types of information differ in the context in which they occur, but in any event, regardless of the type of information collected, intelligence is not evidence. The evidence is of a different nature, it is aimed at charging individuals and must meet strict legal criteria. Thus, knowledge is not equivalent to being able to prove.		But intelligence is not evidence. These types of information differ in the context in which they occur, but in any event, regardless of the type of information collected, intelligence is not evidence. The evidence is of a different nature, it is aimed at charging individuals and must meet strict legal criteria. Thus, knowledge is not equivalent to being able to prove.

Arthur : /* Nature of the information and its agencies */

2018-02-08T22:49:41Z

Nature of the information and its agencies

← Version précédente		Version du 9 février 2018 à 00:49
Ligne 26 :		Ligne 26 :

	Quite quickly intelligence is distinguished by different practices. Three can be distinguished, but there is a fairly extensive literature on the subject:		Quite quickly intelligence is distinguished by different practices. Three can be distinguished, but there is a fairly extensive literature on the subject:
			*criminal intelligence: refers to perpetrators, events, sentences, networks, assets and liabilities, travel, places, means of transportation, methods of communication, but which have in common to be related to common crime. We are in a classic police intelligence logic because to conduct an investigation, we need information in order to build a file that allows us to be investigated. Intelligence is an integral part of the judicial police. We are going to gather clues, but as such it is not evidence, but evidence to investigate a case. Intelligence is part of criminal justice, but framed within a legal framework that is a rule of law. Intelligence can be provided within a specific legal framework.
	criminal intelligence: refers to perpetrators, events, sentences, networks, assets and liabilities, travel, places, means of transportation, methods of communication, but which have in common to be related to common crime. We are in a classic police intelligence logic because to conduct an investigation, we need information in order to build a file that allows us to be investigated. Intelligence is an integral part of the judicial police. We are going to gather clues, but as such it is not evidence, but evidence to investigate a case. Intelligence is part of criminal justice, but framed within a legal framework that is a rule of law. Intelligence can be provided within a specific legal framework.		*Security Intelligence: deals with the prevention of attacks on national security (subversion, foreign interference, espionage, terrorism). Security intelligence extends abroad and concerns the protection of the state, at the internal level, we are in the "high police". Security intelligence is something that is spreading, especially abroad. Criminal intelligence is internally regulated by a legal framework, and external intelligence is not regulated by the same rules. The same rules do not apply to intelligence services if they are internal or external. One is a legal framework and the other is beyond the domain of state reason.
	Security Intelligence: deals with the prevention of attacks on national security (subversion, foreign interference, espionage, terrorism). Security intelligence extends abroad and concerns the protection of the state, at the internal level, we are in the "high police". Security intelligence is something that is spreading, especially abroad. Criminal intelligence is internally regulated by a legal framework, and external intelligence is not regulated by the same rules. The same rules do not apply to intelligence services if they are internal or external. One is a legal framework and the other is beyond the domain of state reason.
	military intelligence: refers to the equipment, manpower, movements, methods, technologies, strategies and tactics of foreign military forces. In a new security environment, we can see that military intelligence is no longer necessarily the main component of intelligence today, even if it exists everywhere.		military intelligence: refers to the equipment, manpower, movements, methods, technologies, strategies and tactics of foreign military forces. In a new security environment, we can see that military intelligence is no longer necessarily the main component of intelligence today, even if it exists everywhere.

Intelligence and Surveillance - Historique des versions

Arthur le 27 septembre 2022 à 22:26

Arthur le 3 août 2021 à 07:01

Arthur le 24 juillet 2021 à 08:27

Arthur le 11 février 2018 à 14:39

Arthur le 11 février 2018 à 14:34

Arthur le 9 février 2018 à 16:21

Arthur : /* References */

Arthur : /* La transformation des pratiques de renseignement : vers une surveillance de masse ? */

Arthur : /* Nature of the information and its agencies */

Arthur : /* Nature of the information and its agencies */

Arthur : /* References */

Arthur : /* La transformation des pratiques de renseignement : vers une surveillance de masse ? */

Arthur : /* Nature of the information and its agencies */

Arthur : /* Nature of the information and its agencies */