瑞士从起源到20世纪的发展
法律入门：关键概念和定义 ● 国家：职能、结构和政治制度 ● 法律的不同部门 ● 法律渊源 ● 法律的主要形成传统 ● 法律关系的要素 ● 法律的适用 ● 法律的实施 ● 瑞士从起源到20世纪的发展 ● 瑞士的国内法律框架 ● 瑞士的国家结构、政治制度和中立 ● 19世纪末至20世纪中叶国际关系的演变 ● 世界组织 ● 欧洲组织及其与瑞士的关系 ● 基本权利的类别和世代 ● 基本权利的起源 ● 十八世纪末的权利宣言 ● 二十世纪基本权利普遍概念的构建
瑞士从建国之初到二十世纪的法律发展是一个引人入胜的复杂故事，其特点是不断调整和重大改革。这一演变反映了一个处于欧洲不同文化和政治影响交汇点的国家如何巧妙地平衡传统与创新，形成了独特的法律体系。从早期的独立州联盟、多样化的地方法律体系，到统一的现代联邦法律框架，瑞士经历了重大的法律变革。这段法律史不仅是一部法律法规的创建史，也是一部在不断变化的欧洲环境中不断寻求地区自治与国家凝聚力之间平衡的历史。对这一法律演变的研究有助于我们了解瑞士是如何建立起一个既尊重其多样的地方传统，又致力于民主原则和法治的法律体系的。
13 世纪至 1798 年的国家联盟
1798 年之前的瑞士是一个独特而多样化的政治和社会环境。在法国入侵和海尔维第共和国成立之前的这一时期，瑞士的主权州星罗棋布，每个州都有自己的管理方式和传统。苏黎世、伯尔尼和卢塞恩等十三个州构成了瑞士联邦的核心，体现了各地区独立自主的不同政治制度。
除主权州外，瑞士联邦还包括日内瓦、纳沙泰尔、瓦莱州和圣加仑王子修道院等同盟地区。这些地区虽然与联邦有联系，但保留了一定程度的自治权，并拥有独特的政治结构。例如，日内瓦因让-加尔文（Jean Calvin）等人在新教改革中的作用而闻名，在1815年成为瑞士的一个州之前，享有独立共和国的特殊地位。瑞士联邦内部的政治体制具有显著的多样性。例如，奥布瓦尔登州和阿彭策尔州盛行直接民主制，人民在称为 "Landsgemeinde "的公开集会上直接做出重要决定。这种直接民主的传统在瑞士政治文化中根深蒂固，并一直影响着今天的瑞士政治体制。
巴塞尔和弗里堡等其他州则采用寡头政治，由一小撮有影响力的公民掌权。这些结构往往反映了当时的经济利益和社会等级。例如，巴塞尔市拥有丰富的贸易和银行业历史，由经济精英统治，他们在政治决策中发挥着关键作用。君主政体和教会政体也具有多样性。例如，纳沙泰尔的统治者是纳沙泰尔王子，这是一个维持君主制的贵族家族。同样，在瓦莱州，宗教当局也掌握着权力，这说明在1798年前的瑞士，宗教和政治往往是相互关联的。
这段瑞士历史具有政治复杂性和文化多样性，为现代瑞士奠定了基础。18世纪末发生的事件，特别是1798年法国的入侵，标志着一个剧变时期的到来，导致瑞士在赫尔维蒂共和国的领导下实现了中央集权和统一。然而，各州的自治精神和多样性继续影响着瑞士的政治和社会发展，塑造了今天的瑞士。
1798 年之前的瑞士不仅是主权州和联盟州的集合体，还包括臣属领地。这些领地受一个或多个主权州的统治，有别于独立州或联盟州。这种复杂的领土结构反映了当时瑞士政治结构的分散性和等级性。日内瓦的情况就是这种动态的一个突出例子。日内瓦市是一个主权实体，因其在新教改革运动中的重要性及其作为知识和文化中心的地位而得到认可，但其周边乡村却受制于各州的统治。主权城市与其属地之间的这种双重性反映了瑞士联邦内部政治和领土关系的复杂性。
沃州等其他地区也体现了这种动态关系。在 1803 年成为独立州之前，沃州一直受伯尔尼州的统治。这种臣服表现为各种形式的政治和经济控制，反映了属地与宗主州之间的依附关系。同样，提契诺州、阿尔高州和图尔高州也是臣属领地，各自受几个州的管辖。这种情况往往是征服、条约或其他历史安排的结果，这些领地通常被剥夺了主权州所享有的政治权利和自治权。主权州和属地之间的等级制度在瑞士的政治和社会历史中发挥了重要作用。它经常成为紧张和冲突的根源，尤其是在公民权利和政治代表权方面。这些紧张关系是后来政治发展的重要因素，特别是在十八世纪末和十九世纪初的改革和革命时期，这为现代瑞士的发展铺平了道路。
在 1798 年以前的瑞士，联邦议会是管理州际事务的主要机构。该机构见证了瑞士联邦尽管拥有地区多样性和自治权，但仍努力保持各成员之间的团结与协作。议会每年举行一次会议，汇集了十三个主权州和几个联盟领地的代表。这次会议对于处理影响整个联邦的问题至关重要，如外交政策、国防，有时还包括具有共同重要性的经济或法律事务。联邦议会的一个显著特点是其一致决策原则。这一要求反映了联邦内部权力平衡的微妙性质。每个州，无论其大小或经济实力如何，都有否决权，这确保了所做的决定能被所有成员接受。然而，这种制度也可能导致决策陷入僵局和拖延，尤其是当各州的利益出现分歧时。联邦议会的存在说明了各州的独立性与集体行动需求之间的矛盾。尽管各州在其内部事务上享有相当大的自主权，但议会是一个可以讨论共同利益和共同关切的论坛，并在理想情况下以有利于整个联邦的方式加以解决。联邦议会以其独特的工作方式和面临的挑战，在塑造瑞士政治身份方面发挥了重要作用。地方自治与州际协作之间的矛盾一直影响着瑞士的政治结构，即使在十九世纪发生深刻变革，导致现代瑞士成为联邦制国家之后也是如此。
纵观瑞士联邦的历史，尽管存在内部分歧以及社会和宗教冲突，但瑞士联邦仍能在五个世纪以来指导其生存的基本原则基础上保持团结。联邦内各主权国家之所以能够共存，是因为有一套共同的价值观和利益，这对国家的生存和繁荣至关重要。团结的主要因素之一是需要抵御外部威胁。瑞士地处欧洲中心，经常成为欧洲列强的攻击目标。军事联盟，如 1291 年乌里、施维茨和上瓦尔登之间的永恒盟约，象征着捍卫瑞士领土完整和独立的共同承诺。这一联盟奠定了瑞士联邦的基础，表明了各州在面对外来威胁时团结一致的意愿。各州之间的和平与公共秩序也至关重要。尽管存在文化和宗教分歧，特别是天主教州和新教州之间的分歧，并最终导致了十六世纪卡佩尔战争等冲突，但人们对维护内部和平的重要性达成了共识。联邦议会在调解冲突和促进合作方面发挥了核心作用，从而为联邦的稳定做出了贡献。尊重和捍卫各州的个人权利和自由也是至关重要的。每个州都非常重视其自治权，这体现在对任何形式中央集权的抵制上。联邦内政治制度的多样性反映了对自治和自由的承诺。最后，通过经济联盟促进共同繁荣是瑞士团结的另一个支柱。瑞士地处欧洲贸易路线的十字路口，这一战略地位促进了经济合作。贸易协定，如各州为控制阿尔卑斯山过境点而结成的联盟，对联邦所有成员都有利，加强了他们合作和维护团结的意愿。这些原则不仅帮助瑞士渡过了以欧洲战争和动荡为标志的复杂历史时期，还塑造了瑞士的政治和文化特性。尽管内部存在多样性，但这种凝聚力使联邦得以保持独立，并为现代瑞士奠定了基础，瑞士的特点是致力于民主、中立和州际合作。
在 16 世纪之前，瑞士联邦一直实行协商一致规则，这反映了当时瑞士政治的一个基本特征。这一规则要求所有重要决策都必须获得一致同意，以确保所有州的利益都能得到考虑和尊重。这种做法旨在确保所做的任何决定都有利于联邦的所有成员，或至少为每个成员所接受，这对于在这样一个多样化的联盟中保持团结至关重要。全体一致规则对冲突的管理和解决方式产生了重大影响。尽管存在文化、语言和宗教差异以及不同的地区利益，但这一规则有助于避免重大分歧，并鼓励以合作的方式解决问题。这通常涉及广泛的谈判和妥协，以达成协商一致的解决方案。
直到16世纪，这种方法使瑞士历史进入了一个相对稳定的时期，内部冲突数量有限。事实上，在此期间，瑞士只经历了四次重大内部冲突和三次战争。这些冲突包括领土之争、管理问题和宗教矛盾，但由于联邦结构和一致同意的规则，这些冲突总体上得到了控制。这些冲突虽然严重，但并未威胁到邦联的生存。例如，在14世纪70年代的勃艮第战争中，瑞士成功地与勃艮第公爵查理-波德作战，这表明联邦有能力在抵御外敌的同时保持内部团结。另一方面，十六世纪的卡佩尔战争则主要集中在天主教州和新教州之间的宗教矛盾上，但即使是这些冲突也没有导致联邦的持久解体。尽管存在多样性和潜在的摩擦点，但这种相对的稳定性证明了瑞士政治结构和协商一致规则的力量。这些原则在维护瑞士统一方面发挥了至关重要的作用，为瑞士联邦后来演变为现代联邦制国家铺平了道路。
在通过正式宪法之前，瑞士联邦内部的凝聚力是通过复杂的联盟和契约网络以及一系列共同的价值观和传统来维持的。尽管瑞士内部存在多样性，但这一协议网络以及社会、文化和经济纽带在团结瑞士方面发挥了至关重要的作用。各州之间的联盟是瑞士政治结构的支柱，通常以条约的形式固定下来。一个重要的历史案例是1291年的联邦条约，这是乌里州、施维茨州和上瓦尔登州之间的协议。该协定被认为是联邦的奠基文书，象征着各州承诺共同捍卫自己的独立，抵御外来威胁。这些联盟不仅包括军事方面，还包括经济和政治方面，保证了各领域的互助与合作。共同的价值观和社会规范也加强了凝聚力。尽管在语言和文化上存在差异，但各州都坚定地致力于地方自治，并相互尊重各自的多样性。这种建立在共同历史和共同斗争基础上的集体认同感是联邦的强大纽带。
经济上的相互依存也发挥了关键作用。各州位于重要的贸易路线上，从经济合作中获益匪浅，特别是通过贸易和海关协议。这种经济上的相互联系促进了各州之间稳定而有利的关系，从而促进了各州的团结。最后，联邦议会为解决冲突和决定州际事务提供了一个机制。虽然议会的权力有限，但它能够在各州之间进行有效的谈判和调解，这主要归功于一致同意原则，该原则确保所有州的利益都能得到考虑。因此，在宪法时代之前，瑞士联邦是合作与团结的独特典范，它不是由一个中央集权机构，而是由一个联盟网络、相互依存的经济关系和共同的价值观来维系的。这种结构使瑞士得以在数百年间保持独立和稳定，为后来现代联邦制国家的发展奠定了基础。
中央集权的单一制国家：1798 至 1803 年的赫尔维蒂共和国
.png)
The French Revolution had a profound and lasting impact on Europe, including Switzerland, by spreading ideas of liberty, equality and fraternity. These revolutionary ideas, inspired in part by the American Revolution, found a significant echo in Switzerland, influencing its political and social evolution. In Switzerland, the late 18th century was marked by political and social structures that were largely feudal and hierarchical. The subject territories, in particular, felt the weight of these structures. The spread of the ideas of the French Revolution began to challenge these old regimes and raise aspirations for greater freedom and equality among the population.
The impact of the French Revolution in Switzerland manifested itself in several ways. On the one hand, there was a growing admiration for the principles of democracy and human rights. These ideas inspired Swiss reform movements, which began to demand political and social changes within the Confederation. The Revolution also had direct implications for Switzerland. The French invasion of 1798 led to the collapse of the old confederal system and the creation of the Helvetic Republic, a more centralised state inspired by French revolutionary ideals. This period saw the abolition of the old feudal structures and the introduction of new reforms, such as equality before the law and the separation of church and state.
However, this period of change was not without resistance and conflict. Tensions between the traditional cantons and the new authorities imposed by France led to internal divisions. In addition, the radical reforms undertaken by the Helvetic Republic were sometimes perceived as running counter to local traditions and autonomy, leading to opposition. The French Revolution played a key role in the transformation of Switzerland at the end of the eighteenth century. By introducing ideas of freedom and equality, it not only influenced political and social thought in Switzerland, but also triggered events that reshaped the Swiss political landscape, leading to the end of the old Confederation and the emergence of a new political order.
The advent of the principles of liberty and equality at the end of the eighteenth century, strongly influenced by the ideals of the French Revolution, marked a significant turning point in Switzerland's political and social history. Prior to 1798, the Swiss political landscape was dominated by feudal and hierarchical structures, where political rights were often restricted to certain classes or regions, and subject territories were subject to the authority of sovereign cantons. However, with the impact of the French Revolution and the emergence of the Helvetic Republic in 1798, following the French invasion, these ideals of freedom and equality began to find their way into the Swiss political fabric. Under the influence of revolutionary France, the Helvetic Republic introduced radical reforms that broke with feudal and hierarchical traditions. These reforms included the abolition of seigneurial privileges, the equality of all citizens before the law, and attempts to centralise administration. These changes represented a profound break with the past. The principles of liberty and equality, which had previously been excluded or limited in political rights, became central to the new political structure. For the first time, the idea that all citizens should enjoy the same rights and freedoms became an inalienable political and legal principle in Switzerland.
However, this period of change was not without resistance and difficulties. The introduction of these radical reforms often clashed with local traditions and the autonomy of the cantons, leading to tensions and sometimes rebellions. Despite these challenges, the legacy of the Helvetic Republic and the influence of the ideals of the French Revolution have left an indelible mark on Switzerland. The transition to these principles of freedom and equality paved the way for modern Switzerland, characterised by democratic government, the rule of law and respect for human rights. This development also laid the foundations for the adoption of the Federal Constitution of 1848, which consolidated Switzerland as a federal state, definitively marking the abandonment of feudal structures and the full adoption of democratic principles.
The French Republic's intervention in Switzerland at the end of the 18th century was motivated by a mixture of revolutionary ideals and strategic and economic interests. In 1798, revolutionary France supported reformist movements in Switzerland and eventually invaded the territory, contributing to the collapse of the old Swiss Confederation and the creation of the Helvetic Republic. This new political entity was largely modelled on the French Republic, incorporating the principles of liberty, equality and popular sovereignty. However, beyond spreading revolutionary ideals, France had significant economic and strategic interests in the region. On the one hand, Switzerland, with its central position in Europe and important trade routes, offered considerable economic advantages. Switzerland's integration into the French sphere of influence opened up commercial and economic opportunities, particularly in terms of controlling trade routes and access to resources. Switzerland's strategic position was also a key factor. By this time, France had already conquered Northern Italy, and Switzerland offered a direct and convenient route to link France with its Italian territories. Control of Switzerland allowed France to secure an essential route across the Alps, which was crucial to France's military and territorial ambitions in Europe.
The French occupation was therefore greeted with mixed feelings in Switzerland. While some welcomed revolutionary ideals and the end of feudal structures, others were suspicious or hostile to French influence and control. This period was marked by internal tensions and resistance, as the Helvetic Republic, although inspired by the French Revolution, was also perceived as a regime imposed from outside. French intervention in Switzerland was a complex blend of revolutionary idealism and political and economic realism. It played a key role in transforming Switzerland's political structure, paving the way for changes that have shaped the modern country, while highlighting the challenges and tensions of foreign influence and national aspirations.
The year 1798 represented a historic turning point for Switzerland with the promulgation of its first constitution, heavily influenced by the French Constitution of 1795. This marked the birth of the Helvetic Republic, a centralised state that differed radically from the traditional federal structure of the Swiss Confederation. The new constitution introduced a fundamental change in the governance of the country, moving from a patchwork of sovereign cantons to a unitary government. This centralisation of power, a novelty in Swiss history, meant the abolition of cantonal sovereignty. The cantons, which had historically enjoyed a high degree of autonomy with their own laws and governments, found themselves integrated into a more unified national system. This unification, although inspired by revolutionary ideals of freedom and equality, was perceived by many Swiss as a loss of local autonomy and identity. The influence of revolutionary France was evident not only in the political principles of the Helvetic Republic but also in its administration and legislation. France, having already extended its influence across Europe, saw Switzerland as a strategically and economically important territory. The adoption of French revolutionary ideas marked a radical departure from Swiss political traditions, in particular popular sovereignty and the secularisation of the state. However, this period of radical change was marked by internal tensions and conflicts. Many people in Switzerland were deeply attached to their cantonal autonomy and perceived centralisation as foreign interference or even occupation. These tensions led to internal unrest, reflecting the difficulties inherent in the transition from a confederation of independent cantons to a centralised state. Despite its relatively short duration, ending with the Act of Mediation in 1803, the Helvetic Republic had a significant impact on Switzerland's political landscape. It laid the foundations for the subsequent adoption of democratic principles and paved the way for the formation of modern Switzerland, a unified federal state that respects individual rights and freedoms, while retaining certain aspects of its federal heritage.
The creation of the Helvetic Republic in 1798 marked a profound transformation in Switzerland's political and social structure. With the establishment of a sovereign central state, the former subject territories, which had been under the domination of the more powerful cantons, acquired equal status. This equality between territories was a significant break with Switzerland's feudal and hierarchical past. An equally important change was the emancipation of the individual within Swiss society. The new constitution gave every adult the right to exercise his or her political rights. This marked the introduction of universal suffrage, a revolutionary concept at the time, moving away from previous political systems where voting rights were often restricted to certain social classes or regions. This recognition of individual rights was in harmony with the ideals of the French Revolution, which advocated the freedom and equality of citizens. However, the Helvetic Republic was heavily dependent on France. This dependence was not only political, but also economic and military. Under Napoleon Bonaparte, France exerted considerable influence over Switzerland, using the country as a strategic ally and source of resources. This French influence was visible in various aspects of Swiss governance, including its political institutions, economic policies and even military affairs.
The period of the Helvetic Republic was marked by internal tensions, as many Swiss felt the new governmental structure to be a foreign imposition. Centralisation, while bringing modern reforms, was often at odds with the Swiss cantons' traditions of autonomy and local governance. Moreover, dependence on France raised questions about Switzerland's true independence and sovereignty. All in all, although the Helvetic Republic was short-lived, it was a crucial stage in Switzerland's political development. It introduced modern concepts of governance and civil rights, which continued to influence Swiss political development even after its collapse and the return to a federal system with the Act of Mediation in 1803.
The Helvetic Republic, established in 1798, was the scene of deep and growing tensions between different political and social groups in Switzerland. On the one hand, there were those who supported the new revolutionary order, seduced by the ideals of freedom, equality and the centralised structure of governance inspired by the French Revolution. On the other hand, the conservatives, attached to traditions and cantonal autonomy, fiercely opposed these changes and aspired to a return to the old confederal model. These tensions escalated into a civil war in 1802, known as the Stecklikrieg, which broke out mainly in reaction to forced centralisation and perceived excessive foreign influence. Conservatives, particularly in the rural cantons, saw the new governmental structure as an erosion of their traditional autonomy and an affront to their established political and social practices.
The civil war highlighted the deep divisions within Swiss society. On one side were supporters of the new regime, often from urban areas and influenced by revolutionary ideals. On the other, supporters of the old system, mainly in rural and mountainous cantons, fiercely defended their independence and traditions. This confrontation was a crucial moment in Swiss history, illustrating the struggle between progress and tradition, between foreign influence and national autonomy. The civil war of 1802 eventually led to the intervention of Napoleon Bonaparte, who acted as mediator to restore peace and order in Switzerland. His mediation led to the Act of Mediation in 1803, which dissolved the Helvetic Republic and introduced a new federal structure. This act represented a compromise between the centralising aspirations of the Helvetic Republic and the traditions of cantonal autonomy, laying the foundations for the modern Swiss federal system. The period of the Helvetic Republic was an era of change and conflict that significantly shaped Switzerland's political and social development. It highlighted the challenges of balancing reform and tradition, and played a crucial role in shaping contemporary Swiss political identity.
The confederation of states from 1803 to 1848
Napoleon Bonaparte's intervention in the Swiss Civil War in 1802 marked a decisive moment in Swiss history. Faced with the instability and internal conflicts that shook the Helvetic Republic, Napoleon acted to restore order, but his actions also had profound repercussions on the country's political structure. Napoleon convened a constituent assembly in Paris, bringing together representatives from all the Swiss cantons. The aim was to find a lasting solution to Switzerland's internal tensions and create a stable political framework. The result of these deliberations was the Mediation Act of 1803, a crucial document that redefined Switzerland's political structure.
The Act of Mediation restored the sovereignty of the cantons, thus returning to a confederal system. This restoration represented a compromise between the centralising aspirations of the Helvetic Republic and the traditions of cantonal autonomy. The cantons regained much of the autonomy they had lost under the Helvetic Republic, which eased tensions between supporters of the old regime and those of the new. However, the Act of Mediation also preserved many of the gains of the revolutionary period. The principles of equality and liberty, which had been introduced during the Helvetic Republic, were maintained. This meant that, although there was a return to a confederal structure, Swiss society did not revert to the pre-1798 state. The reforms introduced under the Helvetic Republic, particularly with regard to civil rights and the organisation of the state, had lasting effects.
The Act of Mediation of 1803, introduced under the aegis of Napoleon Bonaparte, redefined Switzerland's political structure, creating a balance between cantonal traditions and the revolutionary ideals of freedom and equality. This new confederal structure maintained the sovereignty of the existing cantons while integrating certain allied states as new cantons in their own right, recognising their status and importance within the Confederation. Within this revised framework, cantons that were already sovereign before the Helvetic Republic retained their sovereignty. At the same time, territories that had previously been allied or subject territories, such as St Gallen, Graubünden, Aargau, Thurgau, Ticino and Vaud, were elevated to the status of cantons. This expansion not only increased the number of cantons within the Confederation, but also contributed to a more balanced distribution of power and better representation of the country's different regions. The Act of Mediation also introduced extensive political rights for Swiss citizens. The right to vote and stand for election was granted, reinforcing democratic principles within the Confederation. However, these rights remained primarily a cantonal matter, meaning that the cantons retained considerable autonomy over electoral legislation and local governance. This provision reflected the desire to maintain the importance of cantonal traditions while incorporating the democratic gains of the revolutionary period. This revised confederal structure marked an important stage in Switzerland's development as a nation. It combined cantonal sovereignty with a commitment to democratic principles, laying the foundations for the federal political structure that characterises modern Switzerland. The Act of Mediation has therefore played a crucial role in Switzerland's transition to a more inclusive and representative political system that respects both regional autonomy and citizens' rights.
The Act of Mediation of 1803, instituted by Napoleon Bonaparte, represented a significant overhaul of Switzerland's political and military structure. It replaced the complex network of alliances that had characterised the Swiss Confederation prior to the Helvetic Republic, establishing a new organisation that reflected both cantonal traditions and the needs of the time. An important aspect of the Act of Mediation was the strengthening of the military sphere. In the context of Europe at the beginning of the 19th century, marked by the Napoleonic Wars and the constant threat from neighbouring powers, particularly Austria, it was crucial for Switzerland to have a robust defence capability. The Act therefore placed particular emphasis on the need for Switzerland to maintain a military force capable of protecting its territory and sovereignty. This approach marked a departure from the previous system, where military structures were often fragmented and heavily dependent on cantonal alliances. In addition to these military changes, the Act of Mediation also restored the Diet, albeit in a modified form. The Diet, which had been a central element of Swiss governance prior to the Helvetic Republic, was reconfigured as a kind of diplomatic conference. Each canton was allocated two representatives, ensuring a more balanced representation of the different cantons within this assembly. This new structure of the Diet was intended to facilitate collaboration and decision-making between the cantons, while respecting their autonomy. The Mediation Act of 1803 thus played a crucial role in stabilising Switzerland after the tumultuous period of the Helvetic Republic. By combining federal and confederal elements, it created a framework that enabled Switzerland to navigate an unstable European environment, while laying the foundations for the further development of the Swiss political system. This period was essential in Switzerland's evolution into a modern state, capable of defending its independence while adopting a more democratic and balanced political structure.
The fall of Napoleon Bonaparte had a significant impact on the political organisation of Switzerland. After the end of the Napoleonic era, the Act of Mediation of 1803 was replaced by the Federal Pact of 1815. The aim of this new document was to reorganise the Swiss Confederation and define its political structure in the post-Napoleonic context. The Federal Pact of 1815 had many similarities with the Act of Mediation. It maintained a federal structure, recognising the sovereignty of the cantons while establishing mechanisms for cooperation and joint governance. This continuity reflected the desire of the Swiss to preserve the achievements of the period of the Helvetic Republic and the Act of Mediation, particularly in terms of the balance between cantonal autonomy and centralised management of common affairs. A key aspect of the Federal Pact was its emphasis on Switzerland's independence and neutrality. After the turbulence of the Napoleonic Wars and the experience of foreign influence, it was essential for Switzerland to consolidate its status as a neutral and independent nation. This principle of neutrality became a defining feature of Swiss politics and played a crucial role in preserving the country's peace and stability. The Federal Pact also formalised the addition of new cantons to the Confederation, extending the federal structure to a greater number of territories. This expansion contributed to the diversity and richness of Switzerland's political culture, while strengthening national cohesion.
From 1830 onwards, Switzerland underwent a period of significant political and economic change, leading to challenges to the existing federal system. This period, influenced by the waves of liberalism and nationalism sweeping across Europe, saw tensions emerge between cantonal sovereignty and the need for more integrated economic and political development. Politically, the Swiss cantons enjoyed a high degree of autonomy, with their own governments, laws and policies. This autonomy, while fundamental to the Swiss political tradition, began to pose challenges for the creation of a coherent national policy. Disparities between the cantons in terms of political structures and civil rights created inequalities and inefficiencies that hindered the development of comprehensive policies. Economically, Switzerland was beginning to industrialise and integrate further into the European economy. However, cantonal sovereignty resulted in a multitude of customs systems and trade policies, which hampered domestic and international trade. This economic fragmentation was increasingly seen as an obstacle to the country's economic development. In response to these challenges, the 1830s saw a series of liberal reforms in several cantons, known as the Regeneration. These reforms aimed to modernise political institutions, extend civil rights and promote greater national unity. They reflected a growing desire for more centralised governance that could respond more effectively to the economic and political needs of a changing Switzerland. This period of change laid the foundations for the subsequent debates and reforms that would culminate in the adoption of the Federal Constitution of 1848. This constitution marked a major step in Switzerland's political evolution, establishing a more centralised federal state, with a national government possessing greater authority, while preserving cantonal autonomy in many areas. This transition to a more integrated federal structure was essential to meet the challenges of Switzerland's political and economic development in the 19th century.
During the period of political and economic change in Switzerland in the mid-nineteenth century, an ideological divide emerged between progressives and conservatives, reflecting different visions of how the state should be organised. The progressives, influenced by liberal ideas and trends in Europe at the time, advocated a centralised state. They saw centralisation as a means of unifying the country, streamlining administration and speeding up economic and political development. Progressives generally favoured the adoption of democratic reforms, the expansion of civil rights and the creation of a unified domestic market. They saw a stronger central government as an effective tool for modernising Switzerland, particularly in the context of industrialisation and Switzerland's increasing integration into the European economy. Conservatives, on the other hand, were keen to preserve the traditional confederal state structure. They valued cantonal autonomy and feared that centralisation would threaten local traditions and cantonal independence. For conservatives, maintaining the confederal structure was essential to protect Swiss identity and values. They were often supported by the rural and traditional cantons, which were wary of rapid change and the influence of liberal and revolutionary ideas from abroad. These differences led to political tensions and confrontations, culminating in the Sonderbund conflict in 1847. This conflict, a short-lived civil war, was triggered by the formation of a defensive alliance (the Sonderbund) by the Catholic-conservative cantons in response to Progressive efforts to centralise government. The victory of the Progressive forces in this conflict paved the way for the adoption of the Federal Constitution of 1848, which struck a balance between the federal structure and certain elements of a centralised state, while preserving cantonal autonomy in many areas.
The Sonderbund war of 1847 was a decisive moment in Swiss history, marking the end of an era of intense division between progressives and conservatives. The conflict erupted because of profound disagreements over the political direction of the country, particularly with regard to the centralisation of power and liberal reforms. The Sonderbund was a defensive alliance formed by the Catholic-conservative cantons in reaction to the Progressives' efforts to reform and centralise the state. The victory of the Progressive forces in this civil war marked the defeat of the Conservative clan and paved the way for major political changes. This victory led to the drafting and adoption of the Federal Constitution of 1848, which established a new political structure for Switzerland, based on a federal state.
The Federal Constitution of 1848 represented a synthesis of progressive ideals and confederal traditions. It created a strong central government with clearly defined powers, while preserving the autonomy of the cantons in many areas. This structure enabled national unification and more efficient management of common affairs, while respecting regional particularities. Although the new constitution was inspired by various models, including the Federal Pact of 1815, it introduced significant innovations. It established federal institutions such as a bicameral parliament (the National Council and the Council of States), a federal government (the Federal Council) and a supreme court (the Federal Tribunal). It also established national policies in areas such as trade, customs, currency and postal services, while guaranteeing fundamental rights for all citizens. The federal state structure established by the 1848 Constitution has effectively endured to the present day, proving to be a stable and flexible model for Swiss governance. It has enabled Switzerland to navigate through the challenges of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, maintaining its unity while respecting the diversity of its cantons. This federal structure has become a key element of Swiss political identity and an example of successful federal governance in a context of cultural and linguistic diversity.
The federal state from 1848 to the present day
The year 1848 is a crucial date in Swiss history, marking the adoption of its first federal constitution. This milestone was the result of a series of political and social transformations that significantly reshaped Switzerland. After the turbulence of the Napoleonic Wars and internal conflicts such as the Sonderbund War in 1847, a consensus emerged on the need for structural reform. Switzerland, until then a loose confederation of independent cantons, was unified under a more coherent and centralised federal state structure. The new Constitution established a strong central government, embodied in federal institutions such as the National Council and the Council of States, which form Switzerland's bicameral parliament, as well as the Federal Council as the executive power and the Federal Supreme Court as the supreme judicial authority. These institutions were an innovation in the Swiss political landscape, introducing a separation of powers and a more effective and representative system of governance.
The 1848 Constitution also codified fundamental rights for all Swiss citizens, guaranteeing standards for civil and political rights. It centralised important aspects such as defence, foreign affairs, and trade and customs policies, while retaining cantonal autonomy in areas such as education and policing. This approach has made it possible to maintain a balance between national unification and respect for cantonal particularities. Switzerland's neutrality, a fundamental principle of its foreign policy, was reinforced by this constitution. Having been a battleground for the European powers during the Napoleonic Wars, Switzerland sought to position itself as a neutral and peaceful state. The Federal Constitution of 1848 marked the birth of modern Switzerland as a federal state. Not only did it consolidate national unity against a backdrop of cantonal diversity, it also laid the foundations for the political stability and economic prosperity that characterise Switzerland today. Although the Constitution has undergone a number of revisions over the years, it remains the cornerstone of Switzerland's contemporary constitutional and political order.
The total revision of the Swiss Federal Constitution in 1874 was a significant milestone in the country's political and legal history. This revision, which came 26 years after the adoption of the first Federal Constitution in 1848, reflected the needs and challenges of an evolving nation. The main objective was to adapt the constitutional framework to the social, economic and political realities of the time, marked by industrialisation and demographic change. The revision was a response to the need to clarify and strengthen the powers of the federal government. At the time, Switzerland was facing challenges such as the need for unified legislation in key areas, including civil and criminal law, and the management and development of infrastructure, particularly the railways. The expansion of the rail network was a crucial issue for economic development and national integration, requiring a coordinated approach at federal level.
In addition, the 1874 revision brought significant improvements in terms of civil rights and liberties. These changes reflected the liberal and democratic trends of the time, underlining Switzerland's commitment to democratic principles. The reform also contributed to the harmonisation of the various cantonal legal systems, fostering greater legal unity within the country. The Federal Constitution of 1874 thus played a crucial role in adapting Switzerland to the realities of the 19th century. It strengthened the federal framework while preserving the balance between central power and cantonal autonomy. This revision process illustrated Switzerland's ability to reform and adapt, while maintaining stability and national cohesion. The revised constitution, with its subsequent amendments, continues to serve as the basis for the constitutional order of modern Switzerland, testifying to the flexibility and robustness of the Swiss political system.
In 1999, Switzerland completely revised its Federal Constitution once again, marking an important stage in the ongoing development of its legal and institutional framework. This revision, which came more than a century after the major reform of 1874, aimed to modernise the Constitution by adapting it to the realities and challenges of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The 1999 revision did not radically change the political structure or the fundamental principles of the 1874 Constitution, but it did make a number of important updates and clarifications. Among the aims of the revision was to make the Constitution more accessible and understandable to citizens, and to reflect the social, technological and environmental changes that had taken place since the last major revision. A key aspect of the 1999 revision was the incorporation of new rights and protections for citizens. This included strengthened provisions on human rights and civil liberties, reflecting evolving international standards and the growing recognition of the importance of individual rights. The revision also addressed issues such as environmental protection, underlining Switzerland's commitment to sustainable development. In addition, the revision sought to clarify and streamline certain constitutional provisions, making the text more coherent and easier to understand. This has contributed to greater transparency and efficiency in the interpretation and application of the Constitution. In short, the total revision of the Swiss Federal Constitution in 1999 was a process of adjustment and modernisation, rather than a complete overhaul. It made it possible to preserve the established federal structure and the fundamental principles of Swiss democracy, while adapting the country's legal framework to the requirements and challenges of the new millennium. This revision bears witness to Switzerland's ability to evolve and reform in a considered manner, while preserving the stability and values that have long characterised its political system.
The federal structure of the Swiss state, as established by the Federal Constitution of 1848 and maintained to this day, can indeed be seen as a compromise between different political visions. In the period leading up to 1848, there was a clear division between the progressives, who aspired to a more unitary model of state inspired by France, and the conservatives, who defended the sovereignty of the cantons and the traditional confederal structure. The progressives of the time, influenced by the liberal ideals and democratic movements spreading across Europe, sought to reform Switzerland's political structure. They saw in the unitary state model, as adopted by France after its own revolution, a means of unifying the country under centralised governance. This system, they believed, would lead to more efficient administration, uniform legislation and greater economic and political integration. Indeed, for progressives, the abolition of cantonal sovereignty was essential to modernise Switzerland and make it more coherent as a nation-state. However, Switzerland's strong tradition of cantonal autonomy and attachment to local sovereignty made the idea of a unitary state less acceptable to a large proportion of the population, particularly in rural and conservative cantons. These groups valued cantonal autonomy and diversity as essential elements of Swiss identity.
The compromise was found with the adoption of the Federal Constitution of 1848, which established a federal state. This model reconciled the demands of progressives for a strong central government with the desire of conservatives to maintain cantonal autonomy. In the Swiss federal system, the central government has clearly defined powers, particularly in defence, foreign policy and economic regulation, while the cantons retain a high degree of autonomy in areas such as education and policing. This federal structure has ensured a balance between national unification and respect for regional particularities, and has enabled Switzerland to develop a stable and prosperous political system characterised by cultural and linguistic diversity and robust democracy.
.png)
James Fazy, an influential Geneva political figure, played a key role in promoting the federal model in Switzerland, inspired in part by the American Constitution of 1787. Through his political commitment and ideas, Fazy made a significant contribution to shaping the debate on the political structure of Switzerland in the period before and after the radical revolution of 1846 in Geneva. Fazy was a fervent advocate of federalism and admired the political model of the United States, in particular the bicameralism of its legislative system. In the American model, Congress is composed of two chambers: the House of Representatives, where members are elected according to the population of each state, and the Senate, where each state is equally represented, regardless of its size or population. Fazy saw this system as a way of balancing the interests of the people (represented in the lower house) and the States (represented in the upper house).
Inspired by this model, Fazy argued for the adoption of a similar structure in Switzerland. This proposal corresponded to the need to strike a balance between the different political and regional forces in Switzerland: on the one hand, to ensure fair representation of the Swiss population as a whole, and on the other, to protect the interests and autonomy of each canton. The adoption of the Swiss Federal Constitution in 1848 effectively established a bicameral system, with the National Council (representing the Swiss people and based on the population of each canton) and the Council of States (representing the cantons with equal representation for each, regardless of their size or population). This system ensured both democratic representation and the protection of cantonal sovereignty, reflecting the influence of federalist and bicameral ideas promoted by figures such as James Fazy.
Article 3 of the Swiss Federal Constitution, which stipulates the sovereignty of the cantons, played a crucial role in satisfying conservative demands during the development of the country's federal political structure. Conservatives, attached to the tradition of cantonal autonomy and wary of excessive centralisation, saw this article as a fundamental guarantee of the preservation of the independence of the cantons within the Swiss federation. Article 3 states that the cantons are sovereign insofar as their sovereignty is not limited by the Federal Constitution, and that they exercise all rights that are not delegated to the federal government. This provision has been a key element in balancing powers between the federal government and the cantons, allowing the latter to retain a high degree of autonomy in many areas, including education, policing and health. Recognition of cantonal sovereignty in the Constitution reassured conservatives that traditions, regional particularities and local autonomy would be respected in the new federal order. This was essential in winning their support for the new federal structure, which centralised certain powers, notably in defence, foreign policy and economic regulation, while preserving the independence of the cantons in many other areas.